View clinical trials related to Endotracheal Intubation.
Filter by:prospective randomised trial to compare the teaching effect for tracheal intubation following training with McGrath video laryngoscope as direct laryngoscope versus training with McGrath video laryngoscope as video laryngoscope
This clinical trial aims to test the validity of a two-item swallowing screen and to examine the effects of the Swallowing and Oral-Care (SOC) Program on resumption of oral intake, incidence of penetration and aspiration, and incidence of pneumonia in adult patients who successfully extubated after ≥ 48 hours of endotracheal intubation.
Complications are common during endotracheal intubation of critically ill adults. Manual ventilation between induction and intubation ("bag-valve-mask" ventilation) has been proposed as a means of preventing hypoxemia, the most common complication of intubation outside the operating room. Safety and efficacy data, however, are lacking. PreVent is a randomized trial comparing manual ventilation between induction and laryngoscopy to no manual ventilation between induction an laryngoscopy during endotracheal intubation of critically ill adults. The primary efficacy endpoint will be the lowest arterial oxygen saturation. The primary safety endpoints will be the lowest oxygen saturation, highest fraction of inspired oxygen, and highest positive end-expiratory pressure in the 24 hours after the procedure.
This study will compare the efficacy of modified William's airway versus U shaped Guedl's airway in assistant of fiberoptic bronchoscope during endotracheal intubation
Postoperative sore throat (POST) is a common problem following the use of endotracheal intubation during general anaesthesia. It leads to dissatisfaction and discomfort after surgery and can delay a patient's return to normal routine activities. POST has been rated by patients as the eighth most adverse effect in the postoperative period. The incidence of sore throat after endotracheal intubation varies from 14.4-90%. Laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation also leads to hemodynamic stress response. The response can be deleterious in patient with or without cardiac disease. It is related to the degree of manipulation of the airway during endotracheal intubation and has been studied during intubation for some equipment used for endotracheal intubation
The aim of the study was to compare the intubation time and effectiveness, the grade of larynx visibility, and the ease of intubation in adults performed by nurses using 4 devices: a Macintosh blade laryngoscope (MAC), and a TruView EVO2 (EVO2), TruView EVO2 PCD (PCD), and ETView SL (ETView) laryngoscope, in simulated CPR settings with and without CC.
The investigators sought to compare the time to intubation and success rate of the endotracheal intubation using standard double-lumen tube and video tube ETView DL in an adult cadaver model in normal and difficult airway conditions.
The aim was to evaluate the performance of the C-MAC compared with Macintosh when performed in patients with immobilized cervical spine by unexperienced physicians.
Observational ancillary study of the PRETTINEO study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01490580) which is a multicenter double blind randomized controlled trial comparing "atropine+propofol" vs "atropine+atracurium+sufentanil" as a premedication prior to endotracheal intubation of the neonate. Primary outcome: - Cerebral desaturation defined by a rScO2 delta >20% from the baseline value (before premedication). - Variation of more than 10% of cerebral FTOE (Fractional Tissue Oxygen Extraction) during premedication, calculated from rScO2 and pulse oximetry with the formula FTOE=SaO2 - rScO2/SaO2 . Hypothesis: "atropine + propofol" compared to "atropine+atracurium+sufentanil" does not increase the frequency of cerebral hypoxemia.
The aim of the study is to study whether training by residents or anesthesia assistants, on a recently introduced virtual-reality bronchoscopic simulator (ORSIM) improves performance of fiberoptic intubation in patients.