View clinical trials related to Emergency Department.
Filter by:The "Emergency Department (ED) Pharmacist" is an integrated part of the ED interdisciplinary team in many countries, which have shown to improve medication safety and reduce costs related to hospitalisations. In Norway, few EDs are equipped with an ED pharmacist, and research describing effects on patients has not been conducted. This is a multicentre study where the intervention will be implemented in the regular operation of three EDs in Northern Norway; Tromsø, Bodø and Harstad. Clinical pharmacists will work as an integrated part of the ED team, and provide pharmaceutical care services such as medication reconciliation, medication review or medication counselling. The medical condition and complexity of the patient's disease will influence the extend and type of service from the pharmacist. A non-randomized stepped wedge study design will be applied, where the ED pharmacist will be implemented in all three EDs after a three, six- and nine- month control period, respectively. Each ED will consequently have both intervention and control periods. All patients going through the three EDs during the 12-month study period will be included. Patients admitted in the control periods will be allocated to the control group, while patients admitted in the intervention periods will be allocated to the intervention group. The primary endpoint is "Time in hospital during 30 days after admission to the ED", which is a composite endpoint combining i) time in ED during stay, ii) time in hospital during stay if hospitalized and iii) time in urgent care clinic, ED and/or hospital if rehospitalized within 30 days after admission to ED Secondary endpoints include time to rehospitalization, length of stay (LOS) during first hospitalisation, LOS in EDs, rehospitalisation rates and mortality rates. Patient data will be collected retrospectively from national data registries, from the hospital system and from patient records. The Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics and Local Patient Protection Officers in all hospitals have approved the study.
The investigators test the PATH program to evaluate whether the program allows patients to spend more days at home in comparison to patients who receive regular care. The program will involve patients from Penn Presbyterian Medical Center with a set of diagnoses and will provide patients with enhanced services upon discharge from the emergency department.
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that addition of the Monocyte Width Distribution (MDW) parameter to current standard of care improves a clinician's ability to recognize sepsis in the Emergency Department, resulting in earlier decision to administer antibiotics from time of ED presentation for sepsis patients (simulated primary endpoint), with concomitant reductions in length of stay and in-hospital mortality for those patients (secondary endpoints).
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that addition of the Monocyte Width Distribution (MDW) parameter to current standard of care improves a clinician's ability to recognize sepsis in the Emergency Department, resulting in earlier decision to administer antibiotics from time of ED presentation for sepsis patients (simulated primary endpoint), with concomitant reductions in length of stay and in-hospital mortality for those patients (secondary endpoints).
Headache is one of the most common presenting complaints in the emergency department.1 By the time patients with benign headaches present for treatment in the ED, they often have exhausted non-invasive treatments, and physicians are left with few therapeutic options. The investigators therefore propose to study the use of paracervical injection as a novel approach to managing headache in the emergency department. This procedure has great potential, if efficacious, to provide a safe, rapidly effective, non-sedating treatment for headache that does not involve intravenous line placement and systemic medication administration. To date, there are no published trials that evaluate this technique in this setting. The investigators intend to compare the efficacy of paracervical injection to standard first-line therapy (intravenous prochlorperazine and diphenhydramine) for the treatment of benign headache of any etiology in the emergency department.
Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, and because no specific treatment is available, early acknowledgment is needed. The incidence of AKI and chronic kidney disease (CKD) have been increasing over time but it is not until the past decade there is an understanding of a bidirectional nature between AKI and CKD, where AKI predisposes to CKD and vice versa. The criteria for diagnosing AKI is through serum creatinine (sCr) and/or urine output. As detection of sCr-increases are delayed by 48-72 hours it is not an optimal biomarker for early recognition of AKI. In contrast the biomarker neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) has shown to predict AKI within 12h of critical disease or postoperative, and without the requirement of prior measurements for comparison. The purpose of the project is to investigate if the relatively new biomarker NGAL (neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin), which is known to be able to detect AKI in an early phase, can be used to detect development of CKD and potential future hospital admissions in a relatively large and diverse cohort of patients admitted to the Acute Emergency Department at North Zealand Hospital. The study is designed as a longitudinal prospective study where there is an enrollment estimation of 3600 unselected patients over one year. Blood tests will be taken when admitted and thereafter every day for the first week and subsequently every once a week throughout hospitalization. Patients that are sent home the same day, will still be included in the study but without further NGAL analyses.
Recent work in emergency medicine has shown errors were more likely to occur at the end of shifts, as pressure exists to make a number of decisions simultaneously, and after what may be an already long series of cognitive challenges. Decision fatigue may also contribute to disparities by surfacing subconscious bias. The objective of the R21 pilot phase of Improving Quality & Equity of Emergency Care Decisions (IQED) is to identify addressable gaps in quality and equity and use performance feedback as an intervention to improve performance on chest pain, CT imaging, and antibiotic prescribing. Performance feedback intervention will include feedback offline via email or text.
End-of-life (EOL) care has garnered increasing recognition and acceptance in the field of emergency medicine. Some emergency departments (EDs) in Singapore have instituted or plan to institute EOL care as part of the workflow. However, the EOL protocols are not standardised across all these EDs. The adherence to and quality of EOL care have not been formally measured in all institutions. Hence, gaps to improve the quality of care have yet to be determined. The aims are to systematically measure the current quality of EOL care in three Singapore hospital EDs and identify the quality gaps; formulate interventions to address these gaps and implement the improved EOL care; and measure the improvement post-implementation. The investigators hypothesise that the current quality of EOL care in three EDs is suboptimal and the interventions planned will improve the quality of care provided. The study team plans to conduct an interrupted time series study to detect whether the interventions have an effect significantly greater than any underlying trend over time. The quality of care indicators to be measured are timely identification of patients who require EOL care, adequacy of symptom control based on compliance to prescriptions, opportunities to discuss and develop an individualised care plan, perceived quality of care by healthcare providers and next-of-kin, and cost effectiveness. Planned interventions include refining the protocol with collaboration of content experts in palliative care, education and training of healthcare providers, and addressing specific gaps identified to improve cost effectiveness. The results of this study will form the standardisation and foundation for establishing the national benchmark for quality of EOL care in Singapore EDs.
The overarching goal of this investigation is to develop and determine the feasibility of a multi-component intervention adapted from a collaborative care framework initiated in the ED for patients at risk for opioid use disorder. This study will provide important feasibility information for future studies of ED-LINC. The collaborative care intervention (ED-LINC) will be supported by a novel Emergency Departement (ED) health information exchange platform.
IRM-DU is a prospective observational single center study conducted in an emergency department to evaluate the impact of a MRI scanner exclusively dedicated to emergency in the clinical management of patients presenting with dizziness or diplopia. The study will compare 2 strategies : after and before availability of a MRI scanner dedicated to emergency. The primary endpoint is the proportion of patients with a diagnosis of stroke confirmed by imaging (MRI or Computed tomography (CT)) in the group "before implementation of the emergency MRI scanner" and the group "after implementation of the emergency MRI scanner". The hypothesis is that the availability of a MRI scanner dedicated to emergency will improve the diagnosis of stroke in patients presenting with dizziness or diplopia, and will reduce Emergency Department stay, hospital stay and hospitalisation costs.