Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) results in immediate pain release with good functional results after distal humerus fractures. But still open reduction and internal fixation is recommended as treatment of choise due to a lifelong loading limitiation, unknown implant survival and problematic revision surgery after TEA. The purpose of this study was to compare functional results and complication rates after primary total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) and TEA after failed reconstruction or non-operative treatment (secondary TEA) in the treatment of distal humerus fractures. We hypothesised that clinical and functional results are better for primary TEA with less complications.


Clinical Trial Description

Total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) results in immediate pain release with good functional results after distal humerus fractures. But still open reduction and internal fixation is recommended as treatment of choise due to a lifelong loading limitiation, unknown implant survival and problematic revision surgery after TEA. The purpose of this study was to compare functional results and complication rates after primary total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) and TEA after failed reconstruction or non-operative treatment (secondary TEA) in the treatment of distal humerus fractures.

This retrospective study was performed at a level I trauma centre. All patients were informed about the study and provided written informed consent.

All patients undergoing total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) were identified by electronically screening our database by the OPS codes 5-824.4 (implantation of a linked TEA) and 5-824.5 (implantation of an unlinked TEA) between August 2008 and May 2014. Based on patient records and x-rays the indication for implantation of the TEA was retrospectively reviewed. All patients, who received a TEA for an acute trauma with fracture of the distal humerus (primary TEA) or due to a failed reconstruction or non-operative treatment after a distal humerus fracture (secondary TEA), were included in this study. A minimum follow-up of 6 months was set as inclusion criterion. Exclusion criteria were previous injury at the fractured elbow, neuro-muscular disease, cortisone or other immune suppressive therapy and open fracture grade II or higher according to Tscherne and Ostern.The patient records were reviewed for demographic and perioperative data. If the initial treatment was not conducted in our department, radiographs and patient records were requested. The follow-up examination included the evaluation of the range of motion and stability of the elbow, actual pain and satisfaction of the patient. To objectify the functional result the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (DASH) were determined. Additionally, complications and revision surgeries were recorded. Complications were split up into minor (nerve irritation or postoperative haematoma) and major complications, which required a revision of the prosthesis. Periprosthetic fractures due to renewed fall with an adequate trauma were not counted as complication.

Perioperative data, the functional result (range of motion, MEPS, DASH) and postoperative complications were described for each group. Subsequently, these results were statistically compared using the Mann-Whitney U test as a two-way analysis of variance for independent factors. A p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The statistical analysis was performed using SPSS for MAC (IBM SPSS Statistics 22, Chicago, Illinois).

We hypothesised that clinical and functional results are better for primary TEA with less complications. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03302533
Study type Observational
Source Diakoniekrankenhaus Friederikenstift
Contact
Status Completed
Phase N/A
Start date January 21, 2013
Completion date March 31, 2017

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Terminated NCT00580866 - Progressive Splinting Status Post Elbow Fractures and Dislocations N/A
Terminated NCT00991887 - Radiation Therapy for Heterotopic Ossification Prophylaxis Acutely After Elbow Trauma N/A
Completed NCT01944085 - Percutaneous Pin Removal in Children - is Analgesia Necessary? N/A
Completed NCT03969277 - Graded Motor Imagery in Elbow Limitation N/A
Recruiting NCT05602077 - Accuracy of Sonography in Elbow Trauma N/A
Completed NCT02878941 - Synovial Fluid Analysis of Intraarticular Elbow Fracture N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05780398 - Long Term Follow up in Pediatric Supracondylar Humeral Fracture
Completed NCT05391139 - Acute Effects of Dual Task on Physical Function in Patients With Elbow Joint Fracture
Completed NCT05380219 - Effects of Dual Task on Physical Function in Patients With Elbow Joint Fracture N/A
Completed NCT04872205 - The Turkish Version of the Shanghai Elbow Dysfunction Score
Completed NCT01328782 - The Post-Operative Pain Management of Pediatric Supracondylar Elbow Fractures N/A
Terminated NCT04738318 - Steroid Administration for Articular Fractures of the Elbow (SAFE Trial) Phase 4
Withdrawn NCT05075382 - Fracture and Neurological Injury
Not yet recruiting NCT05437133 - Reliability and Validity of Self-reported Adherence to Elbow Orthosis Wearing Time
Completed NCT05870345 - Pocket Sized Ultrasound (PsUS) and Pediatric Elbow Fractures N/A
Completed NCT05258162 - Comparison of Mobilization and MET Post-Traumatic Elbow Stiffness N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT04648488 - Early Mobilisation After Surgery in Patients With Elbow Fracture-dislocation N/A
Completed NCT03161782 - The Efficacy of Different Types of Stretching on Range of Motion, Pain and Function in Elbow Limitation N/A
Completed NCT03379935 - Radial Head Arthroplasty A Clinical and Radiological Comparison of Monopolar and Bipolar Radial Head Arthroplasty N/A
Active, not recruiting NCT04634305 - Clinical and Functional Results After Total Elbow Arthroplasty