View clinical trials related to Edema.
Filter by:Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the most common cause of vision loss in diabetic patients. While anti-VEGF treatments and to a lesser extent corticosteroid and macular photocoagulation have improved outcomes in patients with DME, no single therapy is universally effective and currently there is no a priori means of determine which patients will respond best to any given therapy. The purpose of this study is to determine whether specific parameters of ocular imaging studies including optical coherence tomography and fluorescein angiography can predict response to treatment in patients with DME. This is a prospective observational cohort study that will collect clinical data and imaging studies obtained as standard of care. Up to 150 subjects with clinically significant DME will be enrolled at Duke Eye Center or its satellite offices. These imaging studies will be analyzed to determine whether specific parameters are associated with poor or favorable response to specific treatments. There will be no intervention as part of this observational trial, thus the primary risk to subjects is loss of confidentiality, which will be minimized by the study team.
A 12-month, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Treat and Extend Regimen (TER) of Aflibercept (EYLEA) 2mg /0.05 ml as a Second Line Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema - TADI Study
A common complication of breast conserving therapy is breast edema, which may lead to chronic pain, but also reduced quality of life (QoL) and poor cosmetic outcome. When pain is present most patients are currently treated with physical therapy, but evidence of its effectiveness is still low and a gold standard does not yet exist. A downside of physical therapy is that patients have to undergo the therapy regularly and treatment might even has to continue for years after symptoms and treatment started. Another treatment option is a compression vest with the potential, apart from reducing symptoms, to improve self-efficacy in patients because they decide when to wear it without the need to visit therapists. However effectiveness of the compression vest has not yet been objectified in studies. The aim of this pilot study is to study if there is an effect on pain, QoL and the amount of breast edema of wearing a compression vest, in order to determine whether a large randomized study is feasible.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of postrhinoplasty taping. The effectiveness was evaluated with Ultrasonography and skin envelope thickness was prospectively measured for analysis.
The Fetal Atrial Flutter and Supraventricular Tachycardia (FAST) Therapy Trial is a prospective multi-center trial that examines the efficacy and safety of standard prenatal antiarrhythmic treatment. Study components of FAST include three prospective sub-studies to determine the efficacy and safety of commonly used transplacental drug regimens in suppressing fetal AF without hydrops (Randomized Clinical Trial (RCT) A), SVT without hydrops (RCT B), and SVT with hydrops (RCT C). All RCTs are open label phase III trials of standard 1st line therapy, which either is started as monotherapy (no hydrops) or as dual therapy (hydrops).
Retrospective cases series is a non-randomized, open-label, single-center investigation (Retina Clinic, São Paulo, Brazil) of patients diagnosed with macular edema secondary to diabetic retinopathy (DME) and retinal vein occlusions who underwent to simultaneous treatment with intravitreal injection of bevacizumab 1.25mg and implant of dexamethasone 0.7mg.
The purpose of this study is to determine if patients undergoing a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) experience a clinically significant reduction in healing time when treated post operatively with a specific form of micro and nano-ampere current. The results of this trial will provide a basis for generalizing its outcomes to apply to other joint replacements and revisions by reducing edema and inflammation and therefore will result in a shorter time to heal. The study will compare electrically treated and non electrically treated patients by using digitally based measurements to determine objective reductions of lower extremity edema including intra and inter cellular shifts in fluid distribution, increased range of motion (ROM) and muscle strength, and improved functional tests of ambulation.
The Macular Edema Ranibizumab v. Intravitreal anti-inflammatory Therapy (MERIT) Trial will compare the relative efficacy and safety of intravitreal methotrexate, intravitreal ranibizumab, and the intravitreal dexamethasone implant for the treatment of uveitic macular edema persisting or reoccurring after an intravitreal corticosteroid injection. MERIT is a parallel design (1:1:1), randomized comparative trial with an anniversary close-out after 6 months of follow-up. The primary outcome is percent change in central subfield thickness from the baseline OCT measurement to the 12 week visit.
This was a prospective, single center, open label, randomized study evaluating the biological effect of squalamine lactate ophthalmic solution, 0.2% combined with intravitreous ranibizumab in patients with macular edema secondary to branch, hemi-central and central retinal vein occlusion (BRVO, HRVO, CRVO).
An increasing number of clinical studies on SD-OCT of ocular pathologies and potential new clinical applications has recently been published in the peer-reviewed literature. However, the successful use of SD-OCT in routine clinical use depends upon the diagnostic sensitivity, biometric accuracy and reliability of the SD-OCT machines. This prospective, comparative, observational study aims to evaluate the imaging quality and diagnostic performance of two commercially available SD-OCT machines for both the anterior and posterior segment of the eye.