Clinical Trials Logo

Dyspareunia clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Dyspareunia.

Filter by:
  • Withdrawn  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT05129332 Withdrawn - Dyspareunia Clinical Trials

Vaginal Dilator Therapy Among Women With Gynecologic and Breast Cancers Experiencing Dyspareunia

Start date: August 3, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

In this randomized controlled trial, the investigators will assess the difference in mean patient-reported pain scores and sexual function between women with gynecologic or breast cancers experiencing dyspareunia (painful intercourse) who are assigned to vaginal dilator use with vaginal moisturizer (Intervention Group, n = 29) compared to vaginal moisturizer alone (Control Group, n = 29) over 16 weeks.

NCT ID: NCT03666819 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Anatomic Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8

Carbon Dioxide Fractional Laser in Treating Participants With Stage 0-III Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer With Vulvovaginal Atrophy

Start date: September 10, 2018
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

This phase II trial studies how well carbon dioxide fractional (CO2RE) laser works in treating participants with stage 0-III hormone receptor-positive breast cancer with vulvovaginal atrophy associated with dryness, inflammation or thinning of the epithelial lining of the vulva and vagina. CO2RE laser is a device that delivers controlled CO2 energy to the vaginal tissue and may help treat vaginal symptoms such as itching, burning, painful sexual intercourse, thickened or thin skin of the vulva, and stinging.

NCT ID: NCT00676000 Withdrawn - Pain Clinical Trials

Randomized Trial of Interrupted Versus Continuous Vaginal Closure of Anterior Repair With Mesh

Start date: April 2008
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Vaginal prolapse is a common condition that is treated with surgical correction. Recently surgeons have been using mesh to augment the repair of vaginal prolapse. Common complications of this surgery include vaginal pain, pain during sex, infection or erosion of the mesh in the vagina. There are different ways to close the vaginal wall over the mesh used in these procedures. Currently, there is no accepted standard method of closing the vaginal wall. The purpose of this study is to find out the best way to close the surgical wound in the vagina. We will compare interrupted closure (separate stitches) to continuous closure (one long, running stitch). We hope to show in our study that one method of closure is better than the other.