View clinical trials related to Drug Hypersensitivity.
Filter by:Background: Multiple drug hypersensitivity syndrome (MDH) is defined as confirmed drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) to at least 2 chemically and pharmacologically unrelated drugs. Reports of MDH are scarce and poorly specified and studies which diagnose MDH on the basis of positive allergy tests are lacking. Objective: To evaluate retrospectively the frequency and characteristics of MDH patients in a large database. Methods: All the patients who consulted and were tested in our Allergy Unit between September 1996 and February 2018, with confirmed MDH will be included. Clinical history and allergy work-up results will be extracted from our Drug Allergy and Hypersensitivity Database (DAHD). The frequency of MDH will be calculated, MDH patients will be described, the most frequent associations of DHRs will be identified and analysed.
Background : Paracetamol (acetaminophen) drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHR) are oonfirmed in about 10% of alleged cases. The diagnosis is made via an empirical drug provocation test (DPT). Objective: Detect eliciting dose thresholds during Paracetamol DPT in order to suggest optimal step doses and to identify variables and potential risk factors associated with Paracetamol hypersensitivity. Methods:This retrospective study, using the survival analysis and the multivariate analysis, will comprise all patients who attended the allergy service of the University Hospital of Montpellier from 1996 till 2018 with a clinical history related to Paracetamol DHR, who underwent Paracetamol DPT and who gave their consent to be included in the study. The patients are selected from the Drug Allergy & Hypersensitivity Database (DAHD).
Background : Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are responsible for 25% of reported adverse drug events which include immunological and non-immunological hypersensitivity reactions. NSAIDs have been reported to be the second most common cause of drug-induced hypersensitivity reaction (DHR). They are almost mandatory in a human life and therefore, the drug allergy work-up goes up until a DPT in order to confirm or rule out the diagnosis. Objective: Detect eliciting dose thresholds during NSAIDs DPT in order to suggest optimal step doses and to describe subgroups at higher risk during the DPT Methods:This retrospective study, using the survival analysis, comprised all patients who attended the allergy service of the UH of Montpellier from 1997 till 2017 with a clinical history related to NSAIDs DHR, who underwent NDAIDs DPT that turned positive and who gave their consent to be included in the study . The Patients are selected from the Drug Allergy & Hypersensitivity Database (DAHD).
Currently it is estimated that at least 25 million people in the United States are labeled as penicillin allergic although less than 1.5 million of these are truly allergic. Although combined skin testing and oral challenge is an evidence-based de-labeling strategy the high burden of penicillin allergy labels means these services are available only through specialty allergy practices. There is therefore a need to provide evidence for alternative penicillin de-labeling strategies such as direct oral challenge. Previous studies have utilized quasi-experimental designs. Test dose challenges are currently recommended as a strategy for removal of low risk drug allergies, but the current experience is limited to single arm observational studies and evidence-based strategies for identifying low risk patients are lacking. The investigators objective is to demonstrate the benefit of providing risk stratification in removing penicillin allergy labels for low risk penicillin allergy patients in a single arm intervention pilot trial in the ICU setting, which will pave the way for a future stepped wedge randomized control trial (stepped wedge trial entered separately in clinical trials.gov as NCT03702270)
Currently it is estimated that at least 25 million people in the United States are labeled as penicillin allergic although less than 1.5 million of these are truly allergic. Although combined skin testing and oral challenge is an evidence-based de-labeling strategy the high burden of penicillin allergy labels means these services are available only through specialty allergy practices. There is therefore a need to provide evidence for alternative penicillin de-labeling strategies such as direct oral challenge. Previous studies have utilized quasi-experimental designs. Test dose challenges are currently recommended as a strategy for removal of low risk drug allergies, but the current experience is limited to single arm observational studies and evidence-based strategies for identifying low risk patients are lacking. Our objective is to demonstrate the benefit of providing risk stratification in removing penicillin allergy labels for low risk penicillin allergy patients in a randomized controlled trial.
The investigators are conducting a prospective study to determine the safety and outcomes of placebo-controlled graded drug challenges without prior skin testing in patients with a low-risk history of antibiotic hypersensitivity reaction based on history alone. The investigators hypothesize that the rate of reaction to graded drug challenges without prior skin testing in patients with a low-risk history of drug hypersensitivity reaction based on history alone will not be meaningfully more than the rate of reaction to placebo. The investigators hypothesize that the rate of adverse reactions to drug challenges without prior skin testing will not be meaningfully more than the rate of adverse reactions with prior skin testing as was observed in the investigators' historical clinic cohort.
Background: ß-lactam (BL) antibiotics represent the main cause of allergic reactions to drugs, inducing both immediate and non-immediate reactions. The diagnosis is well established, usually based upon skin tests and drug provocation tests, but cumbersome. Objectives: To design predictive models for the diagnosis of BL allergy, based on the clinical history of patients with suspicions of allergic reactions to BL. Methods: The study included a retrospective phase in which records of patients consulting and explored for a suspicion of BL allergy (in the Allergy Unit of the University Hospital of Montpellier between September 1996 and September 2012) where used to construct predictive models; a prospective phase, in which we performed an external validation of the chosen models, in patients with suspicion of BL allergy recruited from 3 allergy centres (Montpellier, Nîmes, Narbonne), between March and November 2013. Data related to clinical history and allergy work-up results were retrieved and analysed. Logistic regression and decision tree method were used to design two models to predict the diagnosis of allergy to BL.
Patients labeled as penicillin allergic, rarely have this confirmed and being labeled as "penicillin allergic" is associated with increased health care costs, adverse effects and antibiotic resistance. The investigators will recruit participants from primary care practices labeled as penicillin allergic and offer allergy testing. The aim of this study is to develop a community, outpatient program for evaluation of penicillin allergy.
This study is a 52-weeks, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double- placebo, parallel controlled phase VI trial being carried out in 20 centers around China. The study population includes amnestic mild cognitive impairment patients (planned a total of 360) aged 55-85 in both gender. Participants will be randomly allocated to Qinggongshoutao bolus (7g per time,2 times per day) and placebo identified to Ginkgo biloba (Ginaton), Ginkgo biloba (Ginaton) (80mg per time, 2 times per day) and placebo identified to Qinggongshoutao bolus, or placebo identified to Qinggongshoutao bolus and placebo identified to Ginkgo biloba (Ginaton) for a 52-weeks double-blind treatment period. The primary outcome measure is change from baseline in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale- Cognition Subscale (ADAS-cog) and rate of conversion to dementia. The secondary outcomes are changes from baseline in the Mini-Mental State Examination(MMSE), Delayed Story Recall(DSR), Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study/Activities of Daily Living scale adapted for MCI patients (ADCS/MCI/ADL24). Safety is being assessed by observing side effects and adverse reaction during the entire treatment period. Statistical analysis will be conducted according to per-protocol population and intend-to-treat population and the safety will be analyzed in safety set.
The COBIOPHAD project targets the development of a highly sensitive, selective, and multiplexed diagnostic device to provide a quick and inexpensive in vitro test to address the most prevalent drug hypersensitivity to betalactams antibiotics, (BLCs). During a retrospective study, BLC structures involved in drug hypersensitivity will be identified from sera of allergic patients (versus controls) and coupled on the device. A prospective study will be performed for the recruitment of samples corresponding to patients with known IgE hypersensitivity to BLCs based on results from allergy tests and clinical history. Controls will include: non-allergic individuals with known tolerance to betalactams. The samples will be used for the validation of the COBIOPHAD device in real settings.