View clinical trials related to Down Syndrome.
Filter by:As basic and behavioral science identify new ways to improve cognition and behavior in individuals with Down syndrome (DS), the lack of rigorous outcome measures represents an important problem for interpreting findings. Null findings in clinical trials could result from insensitive outcome measures, rather than ineffectiveness of treatment. The long-term goal is to improve measurement of outcomes for children and adults with DS. Towards that goal, the investigators propose to test and refine a battery of cognitive measures that can be used in treatment studies focused on school-aged children and adults with Down syndrome. The batteries are designed to assess key domains of the DS phenotype where gaps remain in outcome measures, including attention, executive function, learning and memory, processing speed, and social cognition. The investigators will examine the psychometric properties of measures (test-retest, validity, sensitivity to change), and to evaluate differences in the psychometric properties of measures as a function of variations in participant age, gender, degree of ID, and the participants' physical health and medical comorbidities. The investigators will evaluate at least 80 children and 50 adults with Down syndrome, per site, at five time points to evaluate key domains with a diverse and novel range of methods. This proposal aims to provide a preliminary evaluation to support the enhancement of clinical outcome measures, which ultimately will increase the accuracy in documenting improvements in the lives of children and young adults with Down syndrome.
The purpose of the Trial-Ready Cohort - Down Syndrome (TRC-DS) is to enroll 120 healthy adults with Down syndrome (DS), between the ages of 25-55, into a trial ready cohort (TRC), and up to 250 participants in total including co-enrolled in the Alzheimer Biomarkers Consortium - Down Syndrome (ABC-DS) study. Participants enrolled in the TRC-DS will undergo longitudinal cognitive and clinical assessment, genetic and biomarker testing, as well as imaging and biospecimen collection. Using these outcome measures, researchers will analyze the relationships between cognitive measures and biomarkers of Alzheimer's disease (AD) to identify endpoints for AD clinical trials in DS that best reflect disease progression. To learn more about the study and participating sites, visit our study website at: https://www.trcds.org/. TRC-DS is collaborating with the Alzheimer's Disease Biomarker Consortium-Down Syndrome (ABC-DS) to allow study participants to be concurrently enrolled in both ABC-DS and TRC-DS, referred to as "co-enrollment". ABC-DS is a longitudinal, observational research study that is overseen at University of Pittsburgh Coordinating Center. ABC-DS participants who express interest in potentially joining a clinical trial in the future and who meet TRC-DS eligibility criteria, may choose to co-enroll in TRC-DS at an ABC-DS Site. Co-enrolled participants will adhere to the ABC-DS protocol and schedule of activities, but agree to share their data with the TRC-DS team and to receive invitations for future participation in clinical trials. Fore more information on ABC-DS please visit https://www.nia.nih.gov/research/abc-ds or http://abcds.pitt.edu/.
This study aimed to explore the effects of Kinesio tape applied to plantar soles on balance in children with Down Syndrome (DS). Two groups including children with DS and a group with their typically developing peers evaluated. Half of the children with DS took Kinesio tape application to the plantar soles and the other half took sham taping application. All children evaluated with dynamic and static balance measurements and DS children evaluated immediately after taping and 45 minutes after taping again with the same measurements.
The primary objective is to characterize trajectories of change on the primary outcome measures in this study population through longitudinal collection of measures of cognition, function, behavior, and health status.
Determine the efficacy of family-informed intervention (INT) vs standard clinical care over a period of twelve months in children with obstructive sleep apnea and Down Syndrome.
To identify the perceptions, beliefs, and family-relevant outcomes regarding the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) with positive airway pressure (PAP) in children with Down's Syndrome (DS).
This is a randomized, double blind, cross-over study of the combination of atomoxetine and oxybutynin (ato-oxy) in children with DS and OSA documented by polysomnography (PSG). Participants will receive high dose ato-oxy for four weeks as well as low dose ato-oxy for four weeks in random order. During the high dose ato-oxy period, participants will take 5 mg oxybutynin and 0.5mg/kg/day (max 40 mg) atomoxetine nightly for one week. Atomoxetine dose will then be increased to 1.2 mg/kg/day (max 80 mg). During the low dose ato-oxy period, participants will take 5 mg oxybutynin and 0.5mg/kg/day (max 40 mg) atomoxetine. Dosing of the study treatment will occur approximately 30 minutes prior to bedtime. Participants who withdraw from the study will not be replaced. Study participants will undergo eligibility screening that will include an initial screening to determine whether non- PSG enrollment criteria are met, followed by a 1 night in-lab PSG and health-related quality of life assessment for participants who qualify based on non-PSG criteria. For participants who are eligible and enroll in the study, the screening PSG night will serve as the baseline measure for apnea hypopnea index (AHI) and other PSG endpoints. On the final night of dosing for both high dose ato-oxy and low-dose ato-oxy, participants will return for inpatient PSG and health-related quality of life assessment. The primary efficacy endpoint is the change in obstructive AHI from baseline (high dose ato-oxy vs. low dose ato-oxy).
This Down Syndrome (DS) speech intelligibility diagnostic treatment study is a pilot clinical intervention study assessing the efficacy of a speech treatment approach for male participants with DS between the ages of 7-16 years.
The objectives of this study are to determine the feasibility and potential efficacy of remotely delivered group exercise sessions to increase daily moderate to vigorous physical activity in adults with Down syndrome, relative to a usual care control. Participants will be randomized to attend 40 min remotely delivered group moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) sessions at low frequency (1 session/wk.,RL), high frequency (3 sessions/wk., RH), or usual care control usual care control (UC). In addition to the group MVPA sessions, participants in both the RL and RH groups will also receive a step counter, access to resources for increasing MVPA, and one 20-min remotely delivered individual support/education session/wk. Content for both the RL and RH arms will be identical with the exception of group session frequency (1 vs. 3/wk.). Participants in the UC arm will receive a step counter, access to resources for increasing MVPA, and monthly remote individual support/education).The primary aim is to Assess daily MVPA (min) in the RL, RH, and UC arms at baseline, 3, 6, 9, and 12 mos., and obtain effect sizes for change in MVPA over 12-mos.Secondary Aim 1 is to assess the impact of MVPA on cardiovascular fitness, quality of life, cognitive function, and brain parameters related to Alzheimer's Disease (whole and regional brain volume, functional connectivity, and cerebral blood flow) at baseline, 6, and 12 mos. Secondary Aim 2 will determine the feasibility (retention, session attendance, use of recorded sessions (RH/RL only) of RL, RH, and UC interventions.
This survey arises from one objective of a PhD thesis whose purpose is to "Identify what social skills people with Down syndrome have that do a routine activity and compare them with those developed by those SD people who perform sports activities."