View clinical trials related to Diabetic Neuropathies.
Filter by:The purpose of this study is to find out the impact of improving diabetes control through weight reduction and lifestyle changes on a common diabetes complication called peripheral neuropathy.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of MK-6096 in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) in adults.
The purpose of the study is to assess efficacy and safety of a single treatment of Capsaicin 8% transdermal delivery system in reducing pain from damaged nerves (neuropathic pain) caused by diabetes.
Primary Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of SKL11197 for the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy pain (DPN). Secondary Objective: To evaluate the safety and tolerability of SKL11197 in subjects with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Primary Efficacy Endpoint: The primary efficacy outcome variable will be the time to exit from the double-blind phase because of inadequate pain relief.
Diabetes mellitus type I is an increasing burden for more and younger children. Therapy should avoid long-term complications as macrovascular diseases and diabetic nephropathy, retinopathy and diabetic neuropathy (DN). There is considerable uncertainty about the prevalence of DN due to a lack of large epidemiological studies and consensus on diagnostic criteria. Nerve conduction velocity studies are regarded as the "gold standard" for investigating neuropathies. We plan a prospective study by investigating the peripheral nerve conduction velocity in a population of diabetic children. At the same time-points, we will do a neurological examination using the Young Score, a clinical score of peripheral neuropathy [10]. The results obtained will be related to other long-term vascular complications (nephropathy, retinopathy), glycaemic control, duration of diabetes, insulin dose regime, hours of sports/week, and BMI
The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness and safety of DS-5565, compared to placebo, in subjects with pain associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety, tolerability and effectiveness of DS-5565 compared to placebo (inactive substance) and pregabalin in diabetic subjects with DPN.
The prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) in industrialized countries is estimated to be about 7.3% and its incidence has been growing in recent years. The prevalence of diabetic neuropathy in the diabetic patient population is up to 50%. When limb surgery is necessary, it is reasonable to assume that diabetic patients will benefit from a peripheral regional anesthesia because of the severe comorbidities associated with DM. On the other hand, the use of regional anesthesia (RA) has generally not been recommended in patients with preexisting neuropathies mainly because of medical liability issues, as worsening neuropathy could be attributed to nerve damage caused by the regional anesthetic. The current state of the art of peripheral regional anesthesia for the identification of correct placement of an injection needle suitably close to the target nerve is to elicit a motor response by current injection through the needle. Constant reduction of the current as the nerve is approached ensures close proximity so that an effective nerve block is obtained when the local anesthetic is delivered through the needle, and absence of a motor response at 0.3 mA is generally accepted as a safety marker to avoid harmful intraneural injection. An important deficit in our understanding is whether diabetic neuropathy influences the stimulation parameters for peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS), possibly decreasing safety. The currently proposed research is guided by the hypothesis that nerves in patients with DM are more resistant to stimulation and the current thresholds for PNS have to be set much higher to prevent injections from occurring within the epineurium. The investigators will examine the effect of DM on nerve excitability in a blinded, prospective, observational case control trial. Accordingly, the investigators have defined following aims: Specific Aim 1: To characterize the required stimulation current in patients with and without diabetes mellitus. Specific Aim 2: Follow-up to examine if the rate of adverse neurologic events is higher in diabetic patients. Specific Aim 3: Guided by the results, formulate recommendations for the performance of regional anesthesia in patients with a history of DM. These experiments will provide better understanding of the needle-current-nerve relationship during peripheral nerve stimulation. Findings from this study will have a major impact on patient safety, especially in the subgroup with preexisting neuropathy, undergoing regional anesthesia.
The purpose of the study is to assess the safety of repeated applications of QUTENZA in reducing pain intensity in subjects who have peripheral neuropathic pain due to diabetes.
The purpose of this study is to determine if Engensis (VM202) is safe and effective in treating painful diabetic neuropathy.