View clinical trials related to Dental Implant Failure Nos.
Filter by:The aim of this study is to evaluate the radiographic and the clinical outcomes of application of the alveolar ridge splitting (ARS) in combination with ATG, associated with immediate implant placement versus ARS in combination with autogenous bone graft, associated with immediate implant placement in patients with horizontal bony insufficiency of alveolar ridges.
Objectives: Inflammatory lesions develop in the tissues surrounding implants are referred to as peri-implant diseases. Oxidants, play a role in inflammatory lesions. The study aimed to determine oxidant and antioxidant levels in the saliva of patients with various levels of peri-implant diseases and the relationship between oxidative stress and peri-implant diseases. Material and methods: Sixty-seven patients with at least one dental implant applied in our clinic were included in the study. The patients were divided into 3 groups; with peri-implantitis (PI), with marginal bone loss (MBL) and with healthy peri-implant (HI) tissues. Twenty-one individuals who didn't have any dental implants were included the study as a healthy control group (HC). For oxidant concentration, total oxidant status (TOS), advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP), and for antioxidant concentration, total antioxidant status (TAS), were investigated.
The extent of marginal bone remodeling around the neck of dental implants has been used for many years as a criterion for defining their long-term success. Apico-coronal position represents a crucial factor in this field. This study aims to establish the optimal insertion depth of a subcrestal implant, with the aim of minimizing the bone resorption.
The purpose of this study is to prospectively evaluate whether including an allogeneic gum graft (PerioDerm*) during dental implant therapy improves implant health and appearance. On the day of implant surgery, participating subjects will be randomized to either receive or not receive a supplemental gum graft along with the implant. Participating subjects will also be asked to complete a brief (about 15 questions) oral health questionnaire. Participating subjects will return to the clinic about 8 weeks post surgery for digital crown impressions and again at 11-13 weeks after surgery for crown placement. Participating subjects will also return to clinic at 1 year after implant placement for implant evaluation. At this final study appointment, x-rays and a 3D intraoral scan will be obtained for the purpose of measuring alveolar volume. The health of the mucosa surrounding the implant and subject satisfaction will be assessed via bleeding upon probing and completion of a brief questionnaire, respectively.
The investigators will use two types of material(PRF-Xenograft) in the buccal gap after immediate dental implant placement. The study design has three groups PRF, graft, and control group. The patients will randomly be assigned to groups by envelop method. The resonance frequency analysis device(Osstell) will be used to measure primary and secondary stabilization. Then the investigators will evaluate each materials' contribution to stability. Pre-op and 9th month Post-op CBCTs will evaluate about bone loss in mesial-distal and horizontal dimensions.
To assess implant outcomes, both clinical and radiological, in a randomized study on guided implant placement after 3-year follow-up, compared to non-guided treatment.
The primary purpose of this study is to determine what effect, if any, do different dental materials used to seal the prosthetic screw channels of implant supported restorations have on dental implant health parameters and microbiology.