View clinical trials related to Dental Caries.
Filter by:to evaluate and compare the clinical performance and periodontal responses of four commercially available one-step universal adhesives with different formulations in Class II composite restorations over a three-year period.
This cross-sectional study aims to perform a population-based assessment of the incidence of decay, dental fillings, root canal fillings, endodontic lesions, implants, implant and dental abutment crowns, pontic crowns, and missing teeth, taking into account the location.
This study aims to evaluate the clinical success of chlorhexidine-containing dentin bonding agent in primary molars with a 12-month follow-up. The research question is: Is there a difference between the clinical evaluation results of deciduous teeth restored with dentin bonding agents containing and not containing chlorhexidine? A total of 40 patients aged 5-9 years with at least two dentin caries in primary molars were included in the study. The study involved a split-mouth design in which the standard bond and chlorhexidine-containing bond as the adhesive agents. Bulk Fill composite was used as the restorative material for the restoration of primary molars with class II cavity. The evaluation of clinical success was performed by a calibrated observer according to the FDI criteria at months 3, 6, 9, and 12 after restoration.
Is zirconomer restorative material more effective than a glass ionomer cement in restoration of primary molars
This triple-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted at the department of Operative dentistry. A total of 60 participants were recruited and were randomly distributed into two groups A and B. After informed consent, restorative treatment was performed. In group A, adhesive with nanoparticles was used for composite restoration while in group B, adhesive without nanoparticles was utilized. Post-operative sensitivity was recorded using VAS score.
evaluate the clinical performance of EQUIA Forte ® ( a HVGIC) and Plafique® Bulk Flow composite resin when placed in class II cavities in primary molars.
Compromised first permanent molars (FPM), whether diagnosed with severe molar incisor hypomineralization (MIH), irreversible pulpities, or necrosis, require frequent re-treatment consequently entering the restorative cycle, which leads to their inevitable extraction and implant placement. Extraction of compromised first permanent molars in 8-10-year-old children allows the mesial migration of the second permanent molars during their eruption, thereby favoring spontaneous space closure as a permanent solution.
Different bulk-fill composites will be applied in different posterior cavities then compared
The aim of this clinical study is to investigate the impact of the deep margin elevation technique on the clinical performance of CAD/CAM endocrown restorations in deep Class II cavities.
The purpose of the study is to compare and evaluate clinical performance between two different bevel preparations in Class IV lesions using nano-filled composite restorations.