Clinical Trials Logo

Delivery Complication clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Delivery Complication.

Filter by:
  • Recruiting  
  • Page 1

NCT ID: NCT06181396 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Delivery Complication

Time of Oxytocin Initiation at 2nd Stage of Labor and Adverse Outcomes

Start date: October 1, 2023
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Early oxytocin administration at the 2nd stage of labor is associated with a higher rate of vaginal delivery, shorter second stage duration, and fewer adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes.

NCT ID: NCT05345600 Recruiting - Pain Clinical Trials

MILTA vs Placebo Use Comparison for the Management of Pain Related to Perineal Scars Following Delivery

MILTADoIP
Start date: March 15, 2022
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The incidence of perineal scars after a pregnancy is high, either related to an episiotomy or to spontaneous perineal tears. These perineal scars can result in acute pain but also in chronic pain for some women. Medical treatment includes level 1 and 2 analgesics and, even for a few women, level 3 analgesic. The MILTA® uses photons which are emitted with low intensity in the visible and near infrared combining 5 physical principles to reduce pain : 1- The NPCL (Nano-Pulsed Cold Laser) emissions in coherent infrared light, at 905 nanometers; 2- Non-coherent emissions, pulsed by trichromatic RGB CSM diodes (400 to 650 nm); 3- Continuous non-coherent infrared emission monochromatic diodes at 905 nm; 4- A constant circular magnetic field (200 millitesla) equivalent to the terrestrial magnetic field and 5- The effect of magnetic tunnel which potentiates the light propagation. MILTA® treatment has been shown to be effective in various managements of pain, but has never been used in pain related to perineal scars. This randomized controlled trial aims at assessing MILTA vs placebo to reduce pain related to perineal scars after pregnancy.

NCT ID: NCT04685668 Recruiting - Clinical trials for Cesarean Section Complications

The PartoMa Project: Enabling Best Post Possible Childbirth Care in Tanzania.

Start date: January 1, 2021
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

Introduction Childbirth care remains suboptimal in many low-resource settings, causing unacceptable maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. Realistic, context-tailored clinical support is called for to assist birth attendants in providing best possible evidence-based and respectful care. The PartoMa pilot study from Zanzibar suggested that co-created clinical practice guidelines and low-dose, high-frequency training were associated with care improvements and perinatal survival. In the present study we will modify, implement and evaluate this intervention in five urban, high-volume maternity units in Tanzania. Methods and Analysis The study design is based on a theory of change, and includes three main steps: I. A mixed-methods situational analysis will explore factors affecting care. Step II. Based on step I., the PartoMa guidelines and training will be contextually modified through discussions with birth attendants and postpartum women. III. The modified intervention will be implemented through a stepped-wedge cluster trial, with embedded qualitative and economic analyses. Women in active labour and their offspring will be followed until discharge to assess intra-hospital stillbirths, intra-facility neonatal deaths and caesarean sections without medical indications, and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio will be measured. Central intermediate outputs include health providers' knowledge, barriers and facilitators to intervention use, and clinical performance.

NCT ID: NCT04159857 Recruiting - Pregnancy Related Clinical Trials

Hand Forceps vs. Conventional One-hand Technique for Fetal Head Extraction During Cesarean Section

Hand forceps
Start date: January 28, 2020
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy and safety of an innovative two-hand (hand forceps) fetal head extraction technique during the transverse cesarean sections (LTCS) by comparing with the conventional one-hand technique used worldwide for centuries. The primary research question of the study is whether two-hand fetal head extraction technique results in quicker head delivery. The secondary research question is whether two-hand technique would cause increased incidence of extension of uterine incision as well as other adverse events while compared to conventional one-hand technique. Our hypothesis is that two-hand technique would speed up fetal head delivery without increasing the risk of extension of uterine incision as well as other adverse events, in the meantime, maternal discomfort will be significantly reduced since fundal pressure will not be required during the fetal head delivery.