Comparison of Artificial Disc Implants in Cervical Disc Arthroplasty

Status Recruiting

Clinical Trial Summary

This study will comprehensively evaluate the outcomes and endpoints of these two different FDA-approved artificial disc implants used to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy and/or radiculopathy today: Biomet Zimmer Mobi-C and Nuvasive Simplify. Both implants are structurally different with the Nuvasive Simplify implementing a three-piece design with two endplates and a semi-constrained mobile core while the Biomet Zimmer Mobi-C implements an unconstrained three piece design. Subjects will be age-matched and randomly assigned to either implant with informed consent. All subjects will undergo a variety of assessments that evaluate neck disability, quality of life, pain, physiological outcome (radiographic assessments), and neck range-of motion before and after their procedure. One baseline testing will be conducted along with three post-operation visits (three months, six months, and one year) in accordance to standard follow-up procedure. Thus, the duration of participation in the study will be approximately one and a half years.

Clinical Trial Description

In cases where surgery is indicated, treatment for cervical spondylotic myelopathy and/or radiculopathy (typically caused by disc herniation or degenerative disc disease) has traditionally been performed by a procedure known as anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) to treat a damaged disc in the neck area of the spine. However, medical advancement in this field has allowed for a new procedure often referred to as cervical arthroplasty that implements artificial disc implantation. These implants mimic the function and structure of discs by cushioning the neck's vertebral bones instead of fusing them and providing flexibility for head movements. The emergence of different artificial disc implants that are structurally and mechanistically different calls for a comparative analysis that evaluates performance across a comprehensive set of patient outcomes. This study will comprehensively evaluate the outcomes and endpoints of these two different FDA-approved artificial disc implants used to treat cervical spondylotic myelopathy and/or radiculopathy today: Biomet Zimmer Mobi-C and Nuvasive Simplify. Both implants are structurally different with the Nuvasive Simplify implementing a three-piece design with two endplates and a semi-constrained mobile core while the Biomet Zimmer Mobi-C implements an unconstrained three piece design. Subjects will be age-matched and randomly assigned to either implant with informed consent. All subjects will undergo a variety of assessments that evaluate neck disability, quality of life, pain, physiological outcome (radiographic assessments), and neck range-of motion before and after their procedure. One baseline testing will be conducted along with three post-operation visits (three months, six months, and one year) in accordance to standard follow-up procedure. Thus, the duration of participation in the study will be approximately one and a half years. This study has significant implications in better assessing the overall efficacy of cervical arthroplasty while providing insight to the differences in outcomes based on the artificial disc implanted. Findings can also contribute to characterizing the advantages and disadvantages of both implants to aid surgeons in making more informed and personalized treatment recommendations according to the needs of the patient. ;

Study Design

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

Clinical Trial Details

NCT number	NCT05701059
Study type	Observational
Source	University of California, Los Angeles
Contact	Mark T Yamamoto, BS
Phone	4245359634
Email	mtyamamoto@mednet.ucla.edu
Status	Recruiting
Phase
Start date	May 1, 2023
Completion date	December 1, 2024

View Details

See also
Status	Clinical Trial	Phase
Recruiting	`NCT04848376` - Post-Market Clinical Follow-up Study of A-SPINE's Products
Active, not recruiting	`NCT05114135` - TLIF Osteo3 ZP Putty Study (Also Known as the TOP Fusion Study)	N/A
Suspended	`NCT04735185` - Stem Cells vs. Steroids for Discogenic Back Pain	N/A
Withdrawn	`NCT03223701` - Efficacy of Using Solum IV and BMC With GFC in TLIF	Phase 4
Completed	`NCT04057235` - Retrospective Review of Integrity Implants FlareHawk® for Lumbar Fusion
Not yet recruiting	`NCT06000319` - Natural Matrix Protein™ (NMP™) Fibers in Cervical and Lumbar Interbody Fusion
Active, not recruiting	`NCT02969616` - Trinity Elite in Lumbar Fusion
Completed	`NCT02558621` - New Robotic Assistance System for Spinal Fusion Surgery	N/A
Completed	`NCT02104167` - Retrospective/Prospective Data Collection on the LDR ROIC Interbody Fusion Device With VerteBRIDGE Plating
Terminated	`NCT00974623` - Bone Graft Materials Observational Registry	N/A
Completed	`NCT00996073` - Safety and Preliminary Efficacy Study of NeoFuse in Subjects Requiring Lumbar Interbody Fusion	Phase 2
Completed	`NCT00965380` - Trinity Evolution in Posterior or Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PLIF/TLIF)
Completed	`NCT00758719` - Evaluate Effectiveness of the Biomet Lumbar Spinal Fusion System
Completed	`NCT00165893` - Comparison of IDD Therapy and Non-surgical Treatment for Low Back Pain Caused by Degenerative Disc Disease	Phase 4
Terminated	`NCT01494493` - Pivotal Study of rhBMP-2/ACS/Allograft Bone Dowel for Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients With Symptomatic Degenerative Disc Disease	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04727385` - Intervertebral DXM Gel Injection in Adults With Painful Lumbar Degenerative Disc Disease	N/A
Completed	`NCT04849429` - Intra-discal Injection of Platelet-rich Plasma (PRP) Enriched With Exosomes in Chronic Low Back Pain	Phase 1
Recruiting	`NCT04469387` - Preventive Effect of Limited Decompression on Adjacent Segment Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion	N/A
Recruiting	`NCT04056520` - Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Posterior Cervical Fusion With Medtronic Infinity Occipitocervical-Upper Thoracic (OCT) System
Completed	`NCT04119466` - Stabilizing Training in Degenerative Disc Disease	N/A