Clinical Trials Logo

Coxarthrosis clinical trials

View clinical trials related to Coxarthrosis.

Filter by:

NCT ID: NCT02719236 Completed - Coxarthrosis Clinical Trials

Direct Anterior Approach Versus Direct Lateral Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty

DAAvsDLA
Start date: March 2015
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to compare the direct anterior approach and the direct lateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty, regarding the postoperative function and pain, complications, radiological finds (X-ray), postoperative hemorrhage, markers for muscle damage (i.e creatine kinase (CK), lactate dehydrogenase(LDH/LD) , aspartate aminotransferase(AST), C-reactive protein (CRP),Troponin and Myoglobin) or other clinical outcomes.

NCT ID: NCT02694146 Completed - Coxarthrosis Clinical Trials

Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Use of Platelet Rich Plasma in Front Hyaluronic Acid in Coxarthrosis

COX
Start date: March 2016
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of platelet rich plasma (PRP) in patients with coxarthrosis who don´t respond to treatment with NSAIDs, compared to treatment with hyaluronic acid (Hylan G-F 20).

NCT ID: NCT02399670 Completed - Coxarthrosis Clinical Trials

The Influence of Global Femoral-offset Changes After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Start date: September 2010
Phase: N/A
Study type: Observational

The femoral-offset (FO) is one of the important perioperative parameters in THA. A prospective cohort study was conducted between September 2010 and December 2013. All patients with unilateral primary osteoarthritis (OA) treated with THA were considered for inclusion. Patients with secondary OA, previous spinal, pelvic, or lower limb injuries or fractures were excluded. Global FO was measured in each patient within 3 months before the THA and at the second postoperative day using a standardized protocol. According to the postoperative measurement, patients were divided into three groups: 1) the decreased FO group, where the FO of operated side was reduced more than 5mm compared with the contralateral side, 2) the restored FO group, where the FO of operated side was within 5mm restored compared with the contralateral side, and 3) the increased FO group, where the FO of operated side was increased more than 5mm compared with the contralateral side. Patients were followed-up at 12 - 15 months postoperatively with self-administered WOMAC and EQ-5D questionnaires in addition to a clinical assessment with palpation of the operated hip and measurement of the abductor muscle strength.

NCT ID: NCT02338596 Completed - Coxarthrosis Clinical Trials

Ultra-Short Anatomic and Conventional Cementless Stems Cementless Stems in Patients Younger Than Fifty-Five Years Old

Start date: June 2001
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

As clinical and radiographic performance of an ultra-short anatomic cementless stem have been investigated only two randomized controlled studies, well-designed trials should aim for a thorough comparison of the outcomes of ultra-short and conventional cementless stems. The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of ultra-short and conventional stems in the same young patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral sequential total hip arthroplasties.

NCT ID: NCT01725724 Completed - Coxarthrosis Clinical Trials

Effects of the Sangvia Blood Collection System on Postoperative Infections in Orthopedic Patients

Start date: December 2009
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to compare the infection rate in patients receiving/not receiving their own blood, collected during surgery, during and after orthopedic surgery. The hypothesis is that transfusion of autologous salvaged blood may reduce postoperative infection.

NCT ID: NCT01578746 Active, not recruiting - Coxarthrosis Clinical Trials

Comparison Between Anterior and Direct Lateral Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Start date: January 2012
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

In total hip arthroplasty several approaches can be used. The newly introduced minimally invasive anterior approach is supposed to cause less damage to tendons and muscles. At the same time there are reports that there are more complications when this approach is used. The direct lateral approach is the most used in Norway and is well documented. There are however those who postulate that there is to high risk of damage to the gluteus medius causing Trendelenburg gait. In the investigators hospital both the anterior and direct lateral approach is used with good result. The investigators main study hypothesis is that there is no difference between the use of anterior or direct lateral approach i total hip arthroplasty in regards to postoperative function and pain, complications, radiological finds (X-ray and MRI), markers for muscle damage (i.e CK-total) or other clinical outcomes.

NCT ID: NCT01435850 Completed - Coxarthrosis Clinical Trials

Safety and Efficacy of the SL PLUS and the SL PLUS MIA Hip Stem

SL-PLUS
Start date: April 2009
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Randomized controlled trial using two types of hip stems, SL PLUS MIA (control group) and SL PLUS (study group). We compare primary and secondary stability of both hip stems for radiographic outcome using EBRA (Ein-Bild-Roentgen-Analyse) after a two year follow-up period. Further, we compare all differences in clinical outcome using Harris Hip Score, Oxford hip score and radiographic findings.

NCT ID: NCT01326832 Active, not recruiting - Coxarthrosis Clinical Trials

10 Year Clinical Evaluation of Primoris Hip Component

Primoris
Start date: September 2011
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Using the traditional and hitherto used uncemented hip prostheses achieved good clinical results, but one of the drawbacks is the risk of fracture in the femoral shaft in indbankning of the prosthesis (1-2%). In addition, the bone scan demonstrated that in the years after surgery dropped almost 30% of bone mass in the femoral shaft. This bone loss increases the risk that in the years after surgery, the increased risk of fractures around the prosthesis and in addition to impeding the described bone replacement prosthesis later. The newly developed prosthesis is anchored in the femoral neck and thus not involve the femoral shaft. This ensures a more physiological or normal weight transfer to the femur bone. This contributes to bone mass in long large extent preserved in the years after surgery, so you have a better opportunity later to make a new prosthesis surgery with good results. The new prosthesis should be capable of simultaneously reducing the incidence of thigh pain in the first year after surgery.'

NCT ID: NCT01279174 Completed - Coxarthrosis Clinical Trials

Galileo-Hip Whole Body Vibration /Conventional Physiotherapy /Coxarthrosis

Start date: June 2012
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common degenerative arthropathy. Load-bearing joints such as knee and hip are more often affected than spine or hands. The prevalence of gonarthrosis is generally higher than that of coxarthrosis. Because no cure for OA exists, the main emphasis of therapy is analgesic treatment through either mobility or medication. Non-pharmacologic treatment is the first step, followed by the addition of analgesic medication, and ultimately by surgery. The goal of non-pharmacologic and non-invasive therapy is to improve neuromuscular function, which in turn both prevents formation of and delays progression of OA. A modification of conventional physiotherapy, whole body vibration has been successfully employed for several years. Since its introduction, this therapy is in wide use at our facility not only for gonarthrosis, but also coxarthrosis and other diseases leading to muscular imbalance.

NCT ID: NCT01229774 Completed - Coxarthrosis Clinical Trials

Use of Etoricoxib Compared to Diclofenac in the Perioperative Treatment of Patients After Total Hip Arthroplasty

Start date: February 2011
Phase: Phase 3
Study type: Interventional

The primary aim of this study is to test if etoricoxib decreases the perioperative blood loss compared to diclofenac. Secondary questions to be explored are: - Does etoricoxib prevent Heterotopic ossification after Total Hip Arthroplasty as well as diclofenac ? - Do diclofenac and etoricoxib both reduce pain at rest and on movements? - Does etoricoxib compared to diclofenac reduce the amount of rescue medication (Oxycodon)? - Does etoricoxib improve gastrointestinal tolerability compared to diclofenac?