View clinical trials related to Covid19.
Filter by:This study will conduct an evaluation of a program that is being implemented SickKids / Toronto Public health that provides take-home saliva testing kits in schools. Operationally, there is a planned randomization so that all schools have an equitable chance to receive the intervention at various time periods during the planned operational roll-out, which will require a staggered implementation consistent with the stepped-wedge study design. This study will leverage this chance implementation to do a robust evaluation of the public health intervention. Schools that are not being rolled out to week one, will begin in the "control phase" (testing at an assessment center, primary care or acute care facility) and transition to the program "intervention phase" (take home saliva kits available at schools) at a randomly assigned time (wedge) over a 6-week period with all schools receiving the program by the end of the study. The investigators will evaluate the impact of the program on SARS-CoV-2 case identification in schools.
This study will conduct an evaluation of a program that is being implemented SickKids / Toronto Public Health that provides take-home saliva testing kits in schools. Operationally, there is a planned randomization so that all schools have an equitable chance to receive the intervention at various time periods during the planned operational roll-out, which will require a staggered implementation consistent with the stepped-wedge study design. This study will leverage this chance implementation to do a robust evaluation of the public health intervention. Schools that are not being rolled out to week one, will begin in the "control phase" (testing at an assessment center, primary care or acute care center) and transition to the program "intervention phase" (take home saliva kits available at schools) at a randomly assigned time (wedge) over a 6-week period with all schools receiving the program by the end of the study. The investigators will evaluate the impact of the program on SARS-CoV-2 case identification in schools.
The clinical courses of COVID-19 in children are reportedly mild, and may therefore readily escape diagnosis. Prolonged intestinal virus shedding has been reported in children, thus rendering the pediatric population a potentially important source of virus transmission. However, the infectious potential of SARS-CoV-2 (severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus type 2) excreted in the stool has remained enigmatic. The investigators hypothesize that stools carrying the virus can represent a source of infection, at least in a proportion of instances, and therefore intend to screen stools of children admitted to the hospital regardless of the indication in order to assess the frequency of intestinal virus excretion. The screening will be performed by validated RTQ-PCR (reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction) assays. In positive cases, stool extracts will be used to inoculate permissive cells (e.g. VeroE6) under BSL3 (Biosafety Level 3) conditions, and the infectious potential of the viruses will be determined. The readout will be based on the assessment of cell cytopathic effects and on the expression of subgenomic mRNA. it is expected to recruit ~100 patients for the study. Additionally, the investigators will specifically examine children admitted to the hospital because of COVID-19, and will determine the temporal correlation between viral loads in the upper respiratory tract (URT) and serial stool specimens as well as swabs from the palms and from the oral cavity using RTQ-PCR. Longitudinal studies on the infectious potential of viruses from the URT and stool will be performed using the experimental approach outlined above. For this part of the study, is is intended to recruit ~100 children. Furthermore, samples derived from >200 patients from our biorepository will be used. The insights gained from the study will greatly expand the knowledge on the epidemiological and clinical significance of SARS-CoV-2 infections in children. If stools are identified as a potential source of infection, the data will have an important impact on safety measures in specific settings such as the kindergarten.
Currently, the tools available for assessing peripheral muscle dysfunction in the intensive care setting require patient collaboration. Several studies have shown that peripheral muscle ultrasound is capable of reliably detecting morphological changes in critically ill patients, in addition to contributing to the identification of patients at higher risk of prolonged complications, especially when performed daily. In this sense, a valid, non-volitional alternative capable of determining muscle mass is through ultrasound assessment. However, current studies are characterized by a lack of standardization in their protocols, which include proper positioning of limbs, transducer, clear reference points and techniques for better visualization of the assessed muscle, in addition to significant methodological defects and inadequate sample sizes. We believe that, together with a tool capable of determining muscle mass and being a safe and non-invasive method, we can contribute to a more complete assessment of these patients, exploring outcomes such as survival, length of stay in the ICU, extubation success and functional capacity. In addition to having the potential to serve as a biomarker of muscle strength during rehabilitation, given little knowledge about the long-term physical consequences of COVID-19, thus promoting a more complete assessment, exploring morphological characteristics of the peripheral muscles resulting from the hospitalization process. and assisting the physiotherapist in clinical decision making in rehabilitation.
Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the virus that causes COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019). Patients with COVID-19 may experience various clinical manifestations, from no symptoms to critical illness such as severe pneumonia and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ADRS). So far, there is no specific medication for COVID-19; hence, the current available treatments mostly aim at symptoms management and supportive care. From traditional medicine perspective, COVID-19 is classified as warm-disease (Wen-yi). The main points of treatment for COVID-19 in early stage based on traditional medicine perspective are strengthen the Protective Qi (Wei Qi - the body immune system), and restore the balance of Qi, which is vital biological energy to prevent the invasion of external pathogens, including the SARS-CoV-2 virus. The Shen Cao Gan Jiang Tang have including Gan Cao Gan Jiang Tang (GGT) with the addition of Ginseng. This formula is originated from Shang Han Lun (Treatise on Febrile Diseases Caused by Cold) by Zhang Zhong-jing, used to enhance the Protective Qi, treat the early stage of Febrile Diseases, This clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy of the Shen Cao Gan Jiang Tang on mild and moderate COVID-19 patients
This is a prospective, single blinded randomized homologous/heterologous prime-boost vaccine clinical study, designed to assess the immunogenicity of heterologous prime-boost immunization with AZD1222 and MVC-COV1901 in adults. Participants will be healthy adults at the age of 20-70 years who have had their first dose of COVID-19 vaccine, AZD1222. All eligible participants of 2 prime-boost interval strata (28 to 42, 56 to 70 days) will be 1:1 randomly assigned to receive a single dose of either: - Homologous group: Intramuscular injection the same vaccine as their prime dose AZD1222 - Heterologous group: Medigen COVID-19 vaccine MVC-COV1901. The treatment phase of this study will be conducted in a single-blind fashion such that the subject will not know the identity of the subjects' study treatment assignment. After receiving the treatment, the participants will remain on study for 168 days following the boost vaccination. For the study primary objective, immunogenicity will be assessed during the duration of the study, including serologic neutralizing antibody titer against SARS-CoV-2, serological quantification of binding antibody to SARS-CoV-2 antigen, SARS-CoV-2 antigen specific B cell and T cell frequencies and cytokine levels. And Safety will be assessed during the duration of the study as follows: - Solicited adverse events (AEs; local and systemic) will be assessed for 7 days following each vaccination (Day 0 through Day 7 for the boost vaccination). - Unsolicited AEs will be recorded for 28 days following the boost vaccination. - Serious adverse events (SAEs) will be recorded from signing of the informed consent form through Day 168. - Adverse events of special interest (AESIs) will be recorded from the boost vaccination through Day 168. This study is going to be conducted in a single medical center in Taiwan. An appropriate number of participants will be screened to achieve approximately 44 evaluable participants for each group. Participants in each group will be divided into two subgroups according to the intervals, 28-42 days and 56-70 days, between the prime and booster doses.
Return to work (not being on sick leave) within one year after intensive care unit (ICU) admission with Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) will be assessed. Risk and risk factors for not having returned to work will be compared to patients admitted to hospital and general population controls. The ICU population comprises all Swedish ICU patients with COVID-19 with at least one year of follow up. The hospital admitted cohort comprises four hospital admitted patients with COVID-19 per ICU patient, matched on age, legal gender and region. The general population controls are matched to the ICU patients in a one to four fashion on age, legal gender and region. ICU patients are identified in the Swedish intensive care registry. The hospital admitted patients are identified in the national patient registry and the population controls are identified in the population registry. Data on socioeconomics and income are provided by the Statistics Sweden. Data on comorbidity, medications and death are provided from the National board of health and welfare. Finally, data on sick leave are provided from the Swedish Social Insurance Agency.
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) which is caused by the virus SARS-CoV-2 has resulted in an ongoing global pandemic. It is unclear whether the relatively low number of reported cases of COVID-19 in people with CF (pwCF) is due to enhanced infection prevention practices or whether pwCF have protective genetic/immune factors. This study aims to prospectively assess the proportion of pwCF, including both adults and children with CF who have evidence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies over a two-year period. This study will also examine whether pwCF who have antibodies for SARS-CoV-2 have a different clinical presentation and what impact this has on their CF disease. The proposed study will recruit pwCF from paediatric and adult CF centres in Europe. Serological testing to detect antibodies will be performed on blood samples taken at month 0, 6, 12, 18 and 24 with additional time-points if bloodwork is available via normal clinical care. Clinical data on, lung function, CF-related medical history, pulmonary exacerbations, antibiotic use, and microbiology and vaccination receipt, will be collected during routine clinical assessments. Associations will be examined between socio-demographic and clinical variables and serologic testing. The effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on clinical outcomes and analyse end-points will be examined to explore any age-related or gender-based differences, as well as subgroup analysis of outcomes in lung-transplant recipients and pwCF receiving CFTR modulator therapies. As pwCF receive COVID-19 vaccination a comparison of the development and progression of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in pwCF following natural infection and vaccination SARS-CoV-2 over time will be performed.
A multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of fluticasone propionate (metered dose inhaler - MDI) added to standard care at early stage of COVID-19 in reducing the incidence of adverse outcomes (any of those following: oxygen therapy, systemic corticosteroids, hospitalization, mechanical ventilation, and mortality) in symptomatic patients either from 18 to 49 years of age with risk factors or older than 50 years.
During a pandemic, length of hospital stay (LOS) is critical to managing high patient volumes and preserves access to care related to non-COVID-19 for maintaining the healthcare system. Moreover, identiļ¬cation of prolonged hospital stay may allow physicians to reevaluate critical patients, focused delivery of specific interventions, and improve the efficiency of hospital care. Furthermore, in previous recent studies, attention has been paid to patients with diabetes and COVID-19 infection may require a prolonged LOS. However, there is little evidence on prognostic factors associated with an extension of hospitalization in mild or moderate illness due to COVID-19 infection. Therefore, it is crucial to determine the most vulnerable patients with diabetes mellitus even if they have a non-severe COVID-19 infection during the pandemic. We hypothesize that the clinically relevant inflammatory parameters may have an impact on LOS in older adults with diabetes and non-severe COVID-19 infection. Therefore, we aim to investigate whether baseline inflammatory parameters on admission hospitals as possible predictors of prolonged LOS in older adults with diabetes and non-severe COVID-19 infection during the pandemic.