There are about 173942 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in United States. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This phase II trial studies the side effects of durvalumab and chemotherapy before surgery in treating patients with variant histology bladder cancer. Immunotherapy with monoclonal antibodies, such as durvalumab, may induce changes in the body's immune system and may interfere with the ability of tumor cells to grow and spread. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as methotrexate, vinblastine, doxorubicin, cisplatin, gemcitabine, and carboplatin, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading. Giving durvalumab in addition to standard chemotherapy may lead to better outcomes in patients with variant histology bladder cancer.
To evaluate the effect of erenumab compared to placebo on disability in employed subjects with episodic migraine (EM) who have previously failed 1 or more migraine preventive treatments.
This is a multicenter, randomized open-label Phase 2 study to assess the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetic (PK) of 2 dosing regimens of encorafenib + binimetinib combination in patients with BRAFV600-mutant melanoma with brain metastasis. Approximately 100 patients will be enrolled, including 9 patients in a Safety Lead-in of the high-dose treatment arm. After a Screening Period, treatment will be administered in 28-day cycles and will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, start of subsequent anticancer therapy, death.
- To evaluate the safety and tolerability of the dual IM pNGVL4a Sig/E7(detox)/HSP70 DNA and single IM TA-CIN immunization regimen - To evaluate the efficacy of dual IM pNGVL4a-Sig/E7(detox)/HSP70 DNA and single IM TA-CIN immunization regimen on Human Papillomavirus (HPV) 16 clearance by Month 6
The purpose of this protocol is to determine the difference in clearance of Mycoplasma genitalium (MG) when using the Australian management protocol versus the current Centers of Disease Control (CDC) treatment guidelines for US standard of care (SOC), to determine the proportion of men from the Deep South, with NGU attributable to MG, and to determine the proportion of MG cases that harbor the macrolide-resistance associated with mutation.
Background: Multiple myeloma is a cancer that forms from plasma cells which normally produce important immune response antibodies. It cannot be cured. Researchers hope the combination of radiation combined with the drug avelumab causes the immune system to kill myeloma cells more effectively. Objective: To see if avelumab given with radiation treatment helps treat multiple myeloma. Also to see if giving the treatments together is safe. Eligibility: People ages 18 and older with multiple myeloma that has come back after treatment and has spread to other parts of the body Design: Participants will be screened with: Medical history Physical exam Blood, urine, and heart tests Possible tumor biopsy Bone marrow testing: A needle will be stuck into the participants hipbone to take out a small amount of marrow. Positron emission tomography (PET)/Computed tomography (CT) scan and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): Participants will lie in a machine that takes pictures of the body. Participants will get avelumab through an intravenous (IV). An IV is a small plastic tube put into an arm vein. They will get avelumab every 2 weeks for 2 doses. Then they will get radiation each day for 5 days. They will continue to get avelumab every 2 weeks as long as they do not have bad side effects and the treatment is helping their disease. Participants will have blood and urine tests, bone marrow biopsies, scans, and X-rays repeated during the study. Participants will have a follow-up visit 30 days after their last treatment dose. Then they will have visits every 3-6 months for up to 5 years....
Cirrhosis leads to portal hypertension and development of gastroesophageal varices, which are the most common cause for bleeding in cirrhosis and a major cause of death. The American Association for the Study of Liver Disease (AASLD) recommends screening endoscopy every 2 years to evaluate for gastroesophageal varices, and annual surveillance for those with small varices on endoscopy. Unfortunately, endoscopy is costly, requires sedation, is poorly tolerated, is subject to high inter-observer variability, and is associated with risks that include bleeding, esophageal injury and aspiration. Noninvasive methods for evaluation of gastroesophageal varices are needed. CT is noninvasive, rapid, less expensive than endoscopy, requires no sedation, provides a quantitative measure of the size of the varices, and allows for assessment of para-esophageal varices, varices in other body locations, ascites, other signs of portal hypertension, patency of liver vasculature, and detection, diagnosis and staging of hepatocellular carcinoma. Single-Energy CT (SECT) has relatively high accuracy in prospective studies for detection of any and large varices but is associated with suboptimal contrast opacification of gastroesophageal varices. Dual-Energy CT with the GE scanners with GSI Xtream (DECT) improves the contrast-to-noise ratio by 60% compared to SECT and is currently standard of care at UAB for evaluation of cirrhosis. The primary objective of this study is to determine the accuracy of DECT for detecting any varices and high-risk varices. The study hypothesis is that the accuracy (AUROC) of DECT will be >0.90 and >0.95 for detecting any and high-risk varices in a prospective pilot study (N=50) that uses endoscopy as the reference standard. This will be a single-center pilot observational prospective IRB-approved study. A total of 50 adult patients presenting to UAB Endoscopy for surveillance endoscopy to detect and grade gastroesophageal varices will be enrolled.
The primary objective of this trial is to investigate if a daily dose of minimum 50 billion CFU of Bif195 reduces the risk of small-intestinal tissue damage in an acetylsalicylic acid challenge model as assessed by video capsule endoscopy in a healthy US population aged 40 - 60 years.
This is a prospective, multi-center controlled observational clinical study. All subjects will receive Titan Endoskeleton TT/TO acid etched titanium implant for the planned procedure. Each site will have a predetermined bonegraft extender to be used in all enrolled subjects at that site.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate a patient's level of decisional conflict for their treatment decision regarding their trigger finger, and study if the use of a preference elicitation tool at point of care is able to alter the level of decisional conflict