There are about 3491 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Singapore. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This is a randomised controlled clinical trial to compare laser peripheral iridotomy (LPI) and primary phacoemulsification with intra-ocular lens implantation (phaco/IOL) in the treatment of acute primary angle-closure glaucoma (APACG). Following successful medical lowering of raised intra-ocular pressure (IOP) and control of intraocular inflammation, patients presenting to Singapore National Eye Centre and Singapore General Hospital with acute primary angle-closure glaucoma who meet the eligibility are randomised to one of the two treatment arms: laser peripheral iridotomy and primary phacoemulsification with intra-ocular lens implantation. These patients will be monitored closely for 2 years post-operatively.
Acute dacryocystitis in adults can be a very painful disease and may not respond well to medical therapy. The purpose of this prospective non-randomised study is to determine the microorganisms causing acute dacryocystitis and the antibiotic sensitivities of these organisms. The study also aims to correlate the microbiological findings to the severity of clinical manifestations and evaluate the effectiveness of our current practice of aspiration and empiric systemic antibiotic therapy in treating patients with acute dacryocystitis and hence review whether there is a need to alter current management strategy.
The objective of this study is to assess the safety and immunogenicity of 4 different doses of adjuvanted and non-adjuvanted mock-up pandemic influenza vaccine. Subjects will be enrolled sequentially into 3 study cohorts with 4 escalating doses of H5N1 hemagglutininin antigen (3.75 µg adjuvanted, 7.5 µg adjuvanted/non-adjuvanted, 15 µg adjuvanted/non-adjuvanted, 30 µg adjuvanted). Starting with the lowest dose level, subjects will receive 2 vaccinations (21 days apart) at the dose to which they were assigned. Subjects will be monitored for safety and for antibody response to the vaccine. A data safety monitoring board will review and evaluate all the safety data obtained for a dose level before allowing administration of the next (higher) dose.
This project will compare the efficacy and safety of 2 methods of disease modification in the treatment of active moderate and severe thyroid orbitopathy. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel, controlled multidisciplinary clinical trial involving Singapore National Eye Centre, National University Hospital, Changi General Hospital, Tan Tock Seng Hospital and University of British Columbia Orbital Services, Singapore Eye Research Institute, Singapore General Hospital Endocrinology and Radiology Departments and Tan Tock Seng Hospital Rheumatology Department is planned. The SingHealth-SGH High Field MR Research Laboratory will be involved in the MR imaging of the trial patients. Patients who satisfy the inclusion and exclusion criteria will be asked to participate in this trial. After informed consent (Appendix B) is obtained, each patient will be randomized into one of two treatment arms: 1) Intravenous high-dose pulsed methylprednisolone (1 gram infusion over 1 hour per day with a total of 3 doses over 3 days; 4 cycles at 6 weekly intervals) and oral placebo and 2) Intravenous high-dose pulsed methylprednisolone (same dose) plus oral methotrexate 7.5 mg per week for 2 weeks, increased to 10 mg per week for another 2 weeks then 12.5 mg per week for 5 months (total 6 months of methotrexate treatment). Depending on patient response, the dose can be further increased by 2.5mg per week every 4 weeks to a maximum of 20 mg per week. A strict management protocol will be observed for each recruited patient. Patients who develop adverse side effects or need for surgical intervention will receive appropriate treatment (i.e. treatment will deviate from the protocol but will continue to be monitored). Patients who refuse treatment will be observed clinically and with imaging as a natural control group until such time as intervention is accepted. The patients will have a baseline assessment followed by regular visits to assess treatment response and adverse effects. Observations will include the use of an inflammatory index, motility measurements including quantitative ductions, exophthalmometry readings, palpebral aperture readings and indices of optic nerve function. With regards to the imaging, the patients will be assessed with an initial quantitative CT scan and 3-Tesla MRI scan prior to treatment. After treatment is started, patients will also undergo repeat MRI scan at 24 weeks and 72 weeks to assess quantitative changes with treatment using the Muscle Diameter Index (MDI) and Pixel Value Ratio (PVR) for the inferior rectus, superior rectus, the medial rectus, lateral rectus and orbital fat (Appendix E). Serum and urine will be obtained at the same time intervals as the MRI scan to assess levels of thyroid hormones, thyroid antibodies and urinary glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). Free T4, free T3 and TSH will be recorded to monitor control of hyperthyroidism. Thyroid antibodies measured will include thyroid stimulating immunoglobulin (TSI), thyrotropin-binding inhibition antibody (TB II), thyroid peroxidase antibodies and thyroglobulin antibody. Other tests including the full blood count, urea and electrolytes will be run prior to each dose of steroid treatment and during follow-up to monitor for adverse effects. The results of the assessments will be analyzed for significant differences in treatment response between the 2 groups. The indices of interest will include the percentage of patients in each group who demonstrate a decrease in the inflammatory index of at least 2 points and the time taken for 50% of patients to show such a decrease. Other parameters that reflect the visual function and motility will be compared at different points in time after starting treatment to observe response and sustainability of response. From the serial MRI scans, quantitative analysis of orbital tissues will be done to identify changes with treatment. Antibody and GAG levels will be analyzed to detect any change with treatment. The types and frequency of adverse side effects in the 2 groups will also be assessed. 80 normal subjects will be recruited for MRI scan of the orbits and brain to obtain normative values for the MDI and PVR for the Asian population (Appendix E). This will include 20 subjects from each of 4 decades (21-30 years, 31-40 years, 41-50 years, 51-60 years). The normative data will also be used to create a virtual orbital atlas. This aspect of the study will be performed in collaboration with the Labs for Information Technology (A-Star).
This study is a comparison of the quality of vision provided by AMO Tecnis Z9000 three-piece silicone posterior chamber intraocular lens and Alcon Laboratories MA60 three-piece acrylic posterior chamber intraocular lens.
This is a pilot study to assess the effectiveness of Neurovision treatment in the improvement of vision in children being under-corrected and to assess the effectiveness of Neurovision treatment in slowing down myopia progression in children.
Rosiglitazone (RSG) has been tested in clinical studies and is approved by the FDA as a treatment for type II diabetes mellitus, a disease that occurs when the body is unable to effectively use glucose. RSG XR, the investigational drug used in this study, is an extended-release form of RSG. This study tests whether RSG XR safely provides clinical benefit to people with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) when combined with one of the currently approved AD medications, Aricept®, Razadyne® or Exelon®. RSG XR is a new approach to AD therapy and this study tests a new way to treat AD by testing whether one's genetic makeup affects the response to the study drug. Clinical data suggesting that RSG may benefit AD patients was first seen in a small study performed at the University of Washington and then from a larger GSK study conducted in Europe and New Zealand. In the first study, subjects receiving RSG once daily for 6 months scored significantly better on 3 tests of memory and thought than those who did not receive RSG. In the GSK study, those that appeared to benefit most from treatment with RSG XR had a specific genetic pattern. They did not have the gene that caused them to produce the protein apolipoprotein E e4 (APOE e4). Subjects who have the APOE e4 gene may have two copies, one from each parent, or they may have only one APOE e4 gene meaning that they inherited either the APOE e2 or APOE e3 version of the gene, instead of APOE e4, from one of their parents. Subjects with one copy of the APOE e4 gene remained at their same level of thinking ability while those with two copies of the APOE e4 gene, continued to worsen during the 6-month treatment. The current study will more directly test the effectiveness or RSG XR on people who either have or lack the APOE e4 gene.
To assess how well and safe is Neurovision technology in improving the vision of people with low myopia in Singapore
To evaluate the efficacy of NeuroVision NVC vision correction technology to improve the vision of subjects with Low and Moderate Myopia in Asian eyes in Singapore
Laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) are currently the 2 main refractive surgeries to correct myopia which are being performed worldwide, with more patients preferring LASIK to PRK because of better comfort and faster rehabilitation. However, in post-LASIK patients, there is a low risk of flap dislodgement. This risk increases with certain occupations which have a higher risk of trauma. Hence, there may be a role for PRK for people which such occupations, e.g. soldiers, parachutists, sportsman. There are several non-randomised studies which show that PRK is as efficacious, predictable and safe as LASIK for low to moderate myopes. But there have been only a few randomized controlled studies to compare the efficacy and safety of the 2 treatment modalities and all studies comparing LASIK and PRK suffer from a high dropout rate during the follow-up period. We compared the efficacy, predictability, stability and safety of LASIK versus PRK over a one year duration with almost 100% attendance during all follow-up visits.