There are about 13332 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Netherlands. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
A phase 1/2a, first-in-human trial to evaluate the safety and tolerability of LAVA-051 in patients with relapsed or refractory Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL), Multiple Myeloma (MM), or Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML).
The study has 2 parts. The first part is open to adults with different types of advanced cancer (solid tumours with changes in the HER2 gene) for whom previous treatment was not successful. The second part is open to people with non-small cell lung cancer with a specific mutation in the HER2 gene. The purpose of the first study part is to find the highest dose of a medicine called zongertinib the participants can tolerate. Once this dose is found, it will be used in the second study part to test whether zongertinib can make tumours shrink. In this study, zongertinib is given to people for the first time. Participants take zongertinib as tablets once a day or twice a day. The participants are in the study for as long as they benefit from and can tolerate treatment. Study doctors regularly check the participants' health and monitor the tumours. The doctors also take note of any unwanted effects that could have been caused by zongertinib.
Rationale: Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a minimal invasive technique using the natural body orifices like stomach, oesophagus, bladder, rectum and vagina to access the human body for surgery. In 2012, the first vaginal NOTES (vNOTES) hysterectomy was performed. Potential benefits of vNOTES hysterectomy, also called the vaginal assisted NOTES hysterectomy (VANH) are no visible scars, less pain and a shorter hospital stay compared with laparoscopic hysterectomy as shown in the HALON trial. Up to now, no studies have compared the vNOTES hysterectomy with vaginal hysterectomy. Objective: The aim of this study is to compare the vNOTES hysterectomy with the vaginal hysterectomy for same day-discharge (SDD), complications, treatment related outcomes, post-operative recovery, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Study design: The study concerns a single-blinded, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Study population: Eligible women who fulfill the inclusion criteria and will undergo a hysterectomy for benign indication. Intervention: The study population will be randomly allocated to the VANH-group, who undergo a vaginal assisted NOTES hysterectomy (intervention group) or the vaginal hysterectomy group (control-group) and the participants will be single blinded. The pre- and postoperative care will be the same for both groups. Main study parameters/endpoints: Primary outcome is the percentage of patients that underwent the hysterectomy as in SDD setting. A total of 41 patients should be included in the control group and a total of 83 patients in the intervention group, using an enrollment ratio of 1:2, with an alpha of 0.05 and a power of 0.8. The secondary outcomes are complications, treatment related outcomes, post-operative recovery, quality of life and cost-effectiveness. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: vNOTES is a new surgical technique, but a combination of two existing techniques namely the vaginal hysterectomy and the laparoscopic hysterectomy. Only one randomized controlled trial has been published, comparing the total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) with the VANH, which shows no inferiority of the vNOTES technique compared to a laparoscopy. A recent case series study has been published about the complication rate in VANH. There was a total complication rate in the hysterectomy group of 5.2%, in which 1.4% was intra-operative and 3.8% postoperative. Theoretically it is possible that the VANH causes less intra-operative complications because of an improved view during the procedure. No further literature is known about VH versus VANH. Participants of the study should fill in multiple questionnaires before randomization and postoperative about their general health, pain experience and used analgesics.
A prospective cohort study on active surveillance after neoadjuvant chemoradiation for oesophageal cancer: SANO-2 study.
Multicenter study to evaluate the efficacy of the motorized spiral enteroscope in the management of small bowel diseases.
This is a first-in-human study in adult healthy participants consisting of two parts. In Part 1, participants will receive one dose of study drug (LEO 153339) or placebo; in Part 2, participants will receive multiple doses of study drug or placebo. The participants will stay in the clinic for 6 days (Part 1) or for 12 days (Part 2) to have the study doctor assess their safety and to investigate how quickly and to what extent LEO 153339 (and the breakdown product) is absorbed, transported, and eliminated from the body. The purpose is to assess the safety and tolerability of LEO 153339 when compared to a placebo with no active ingredient.
This study investigated whether focusing on one's body functionality (i.e., everything the body can do, rather than how it looks) would lead to improvements in body image, self-esteem, and self-kindness among women who have undergone bariatric surgery.
This study is a randomised, controlled, phase II trial to assess the efficacy of 2 hours normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) of extended criteria(EC)-DBD (donation after brain death) and DCD (donation after circulatory death) donor kidneys compared to standard care, which is hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) only in the Netherlands.
This trial is an extension trial to EASE SBS 2. The study looks at whether glepaglutide is a safe treatment for participants with Short Bowel Syndrome (SBS), as well as how well effectiveness is maintained during long term treatment. Participants in this trial will receive glepaglutide as once-weekly injections under the skin (subcutaneous, s.c.) for approximately 2 years.
This is an investigator-initiated, randomized, multi-center, non-inferiority clinical trial. Patients with a Chronic Total Occlusion who are eligible for PCI will be randomized to additional Drug-Coated-Balloon treatment or stenting of adjacent residual disease to the CTO body. The aim of this study is to investigate whether treatment with DCB is non-inferior to complete stenting of the CTO body.