There are about 13332 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Netherlands. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Catecholamine (CA) neurotransmitters, such as dopamine (DA) and noradrenaline (NA), have long been implicated playing a critical role in cognitive functions, such as working memory (WM), inhibition, learning, and decision making. Recent evidence from neurodegenerative patients and the healthy population suggested that CA also influences language processing. However, the question of what kind of influence that CA might exert on language is still open. Some previous studies have shown that CA can enhance semantic processing. In a recent study it was observed that CA agonists (i.e., methylphenidate) enhance participant's sensitivity to semantically incongruent information even when language processing was actually goal-irrelevant. On the other hand, the processing of semantically congruent information was enhanced while language processing was the goal. Moreover, consistent with some previous findings that there is a relation between participants' baseline characteristics and MPH effects, it was observed that participants with lower WM capacity benefited more from receiving methylphenidate. These results shed light on the relation between CA and language processing, but also lead to further questions, such as whether the interaction between CA and semantic processing is language-specific or mediated by the relation between CA and more general cognitive functions (e.g., WM, inhibition), and whether CA also has an influence on other aspects of language processing, such as syntactic processing. The present study aimed to further investigate the nature of the relation between CA and language processing by administrating methylphenidate (MPH) to healthy participants. MPH is an indirect CA agonist, which is the most commonly prescribed drug for attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Previous studies have shown that MPH can efficiently increase the extracellular levels of CA in the brain by blocking their reuptake. Objective: The primary objectives are: 1) to further investigate the effect of CA on semantic processing. The study plans to examine whether MPH interacts with processing of sentence context constraints via its influence on cognitive control operations. 2) To investigate the effects of MPH on syntactic processing. More specifically, the study is interested in whether MPH has an influence on revising syntactically temporarily ambiguous sentences. A secondary objective is to further examine the relation between MPH effects and the baseline characteristics of individual participants. Study design: This study will use a within-subject, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover design. Study population: Approximately 40 healthy native Dutch speakers between 18 and 45 years old will be recruited. All subjects will have to complete one screening session and two separate testing sessions within three different days at the Donders Centre for Cognitive Neuroimaging (DCCN). Intervention: Participants will either orally receive a 20mg methylphenidate or placebo capsule in each of the two testing sessions. Methylphenidate has been approved for clinical use in the Netherlands and the drug can be administered safely without any relevant risk of serious adverse events. Main study parameters: Primary study parameters will include sentence comprehension capacity, attention and processing speed. In addition, several other measures will be included to monitor participants' baseline characteristics (e.g. working memory capacity, vocabulary size) and the general modulation effects of MPH (e.g. heart rate, blood pressure, subjective feeling). Hypotheses: Based on the previous finding that methylphenidate improves cognitive stability while it impairs flexible updating, the hypothesis is that methylphenidate will hinder participants' performance in resolving syntactic ambiguity, which requires an immediate updating and revising of an initial interpretation. This should be reflected in event-related potential (ERP) measures related to revision, namely the P600 effect is predicted to be reduced in the drug condition compared to placebo.
- Research Question: Does convalescent plasma (CCP) collected from donors who have recovered from COVID-19 and who have a very high titre of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies reduce the risk of hospitalisation (for COVID-19) or death in patients with early symptoms of acute COVID-19 who are vulnerable to this disease compared to standard of care? - Study product: Very high antibody titre COVID-19 convalescent plasma collected more than 15 days after end of symptoms in COVID-19 patients who also had received at least one dose of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. - Methodology: Multicentre, randomised, open-label, adaptive superiority trial: COVID-19 very high neutralizing Ab titre convalescent plasma vs standard care in 2 cohorts of vulnerable patients (cohort 1: elderly (≥ 70 years) and younger with comorbidities, cohort 2: immunosuppressed patients). - Study phase: Phase 3 - Intervention: Two units of high antibody titre COVID-19 convalescent plasma to individuals randomised to the intervention group, 2 units from 2 different donors, preferably transfused on the same day. Plasma provided by convalescent vaccinated donors with a minimum antibody titre of 1:640 against delta variant (B1.617.2) or antibody concentration >=4.000 BAU/ml in the QuantiVac anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG ELISA or >=20.000 U/ml in the Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 CLIA - Randomisation: 1:1 (standard of care + convalescent plasma vs. standard of care) stratified by centre (cohorts 1 and 2)
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of tulisokibart in participants with SSc-ILD.
The iLTB is a proof-of-concept initiative for children with r/r hematological malignancies, in which available treatment options will be prioritized by actionable events in a harmonized and uniform setting across Europe by a team of biologists, bio-statisticians, bio-informaticians, disease experts, geneticists, flow-experts, clinical trial physicians and also the treating physician. The iLTB will discuss molecular (genetic lesions), immunophenotypic/surface antigen markers information and, if available, drug response profiles to prioritize these events taking into account the treatment history and treatment intention (bridging to hematopoietic stem cell transplanation/CAR-T or palliative) of each patient followed by a registry to monitor how often iLTB advice has been followed, which other therapy was chosen (off-label, compassionate use) and what the patient outcome is at an aggregated level. As such the iLTB is non-interventional as it mainly provides advice and registers data on patients discussed in the iLTB.
The purpose of the Columbus-AD study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 12 months of encorafenib in combination with binimetinib in adjuvant setting of BRAF V600E/K mutant stage IIB/C melanoma versus the current standard of care (surveillance).
Rationale: Approximately 15-20% of strokes originates from an atherosclerotic plaque rupture in the carotid artery. To reduce the risk of stroke, patients should be evaluated for possible carotid endarterectomy (CEA), which is based on simple geometrical and clinical measures. Multiple studies have shown that the current risk stratification may lead to both over- and under-treatment for patients with carotid artery stenosis. This implicates that the current guidelines are lacking patient-specific parameters and have limited sensitivity. There is a wealth of evidence implicating the important role of local (disturbed) blood flow throughout the onset and progression of atherosclerosis. Novel flow-related measures, that go beyond simple geometrical indications, are required to improve diagnosis and treatment in patients with carotid artery stenosis. Nowadays, ultrasound (US) is one of the main techniques to assess for the presence and extent of carotid artery stenosis. However, current clinically-used US systems are unable to acquire and visualize the complex flow phenomena that play such a crucial role in the atherosclerotic disease process. With the advent of ultrafast ultrasound imaging, acquiring thousands of images per second, continuous tracking of flow in all directions became feasible, which enables us to image two-dimensional blood flow and possible disturbances with high accuracy and precision. In this project, we aim to assess whether flow (related) parameters are associated with disease progression (and if so, which), in order to map the progression of atherosclerotic plaques using non-invasive, US-based blood flow imaging. In the future, this could improve risk stratification for individual patients for surgery, decrease patient mortality and morbidity, and therefore reduce healthcare costs. Objective: To longitudinally assess the association between spatio-temporal blood flow velocities (peak systole and end-diastole at common carotid artery, maximum stenosis and internal carotid artery) and the progression of carotid atherosclerosis defined by duplex measurements. Secondary objectives are to investigate the association between blood flow-derived parameters, including wall shear stress (WSS), vector complexity and vorticity, and the progression of atherosclerosis defined by duplex measurements. Furthermore, to assess the association between spatio-temporal blood flow velocities and blood flow-derived parameters (WSS, vector complexity and vorticity) and the progression of atherosclerosis as measured using ultrasound-based strain imaging.
To assess the safety, tolerability, biomarker, cognitive, and clinical efficacy of investigational products in participants with an Alzheimer's disease-causing mutation by determining if treatment with the study drug improves disease-related biomarkers and slows the rate of progression of cognitive or clinical impairment.
This study will compare the efficacy and safety of unesbulin plus dacarbazine versus placebo plus dacarbazine in participants with unresectable or metastatic, relapsed or refractory LMS who have received at least 1 prior line of systemic therapy.
This is a Phase IIIb, single-arm, multicenter, OLE study. Participants receiving ocrelizumab as an investigational medicinal product (IMP) in a Roche sponsored Parent study who continue to receive ocrelizumab or are in safety follow-up at the time of the closure of their respective Parent study (WA21092, WA21093 or WA25046) are eligible for enrollment in this extension study. Participants who will continue ocrelizumab treatment will receive IMP based on the dosage and administration received at the time of rollover from the Parent study.
Rationale: Increased albuminuria has a relatively high prevalence in the general population (5-9%) People with increased albuminuria are more likely to develop progressive kidney and cardiovascular disease compared to persons with no albuminuria. ACE-inhibitors or Angiotensin Receptor Blockers are recommended by clinical practice guidelines to lower albuminuria in patients with hypertension and diabetes. However, despite these drugs decrease albuminuria by approximately 30%, elevated albuminuria remains present in the substantial proportion of persons in the general population. SGLT2 inhibitors are a relatively new class of drugs. Originally they were developed as oral antihyperglycemic drugs. SGLT2 inhibitors have been demonstrated to lower albuminuria and protect the kidney in patients with established chronic kidney disease (CKD) with or without diabetes. Whether the efficacy of SGTL2 inhibitors to lower albuminuria (and possibly confer kidney protection) to persons in the general population (with or without diabetes or hypertension) with persistent albuminuria who generally are at early stages of CKD is unknown. Objective: To assess the albuminuria lowering effects of dapagliflozin in subjects with and without diabetes or hypertension and persistent elevated albuminuria. Study design: Randomized placebo-controlled double blind clinical trial of 24 weeks in duration followed by a 4 weeks wash-out period