There are about 13332 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Netherlands. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Rationale: In patients with COVID-19 admitted to the hospital, large heterogeneity exists in patients, timing and dosing of steroid therapy. It is unclear how to treat patients who fail dexamethasone therapy. High-dose steroids are prescribed mainly in patients with the most severe disease, which may be too late given the potential escalation of pathophysiological pathways in these patients. Objectives: The main objective is to determine the most optimal form, timing and dosing of steroid therapy to reduce the morbidity and mortality of patients admitted to the hospital for COVID-19. This objective will be addressed in 4 work packages (WP): - WP-1A-ward admission: What is the effect of higher dose steroids upon hospital admission on clinical deterioration and what would be the optimal timing of increasing steroid dosage? - WP1B-ward late: Do high-dose steroids, compared to no steroids, improve outcomes in dexamethasone-unresponsive COVID-19 patients on the ward after dexamethasone 6 mg/day for 10 days? - WP2-ICU admission: Do high-dose steroids, compared to 6 mg/day dexamethasone or its equivalent, improve outcomes in patients admitted to the ICU with moderate/severe C-ARDS? - WP3-ICU late: Do high-dose steroids, compared to no steroids, improve outcomes in ICU patients with moderate/severe C-ARDS after dexamethasone 6 mg/day for 10 days? - WP4-biobank: Can biomarkers help predict outcomes after (high dosed) steroid therapy? Study design: Retrospective observational multicenter study in the Netherlands. Study population: Adult patients (≥ 18 years) hospitalized with COVID-19 will be included, more specifically: Intervention (if applicable): Not applicable (retrospective study design). Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: Given the retrospective nature of the study, no burden, risks or benefits for the patient are associated with participation. The target population of this study is specific to hospitalized patients with COVID-19.
Rationale: Delirium is a type of acute encephalopathy that is triggered by an underlying somatic disorder. Patients experience disturbances in attention, alertness and other cognitive functions. In patients with delirium, a characteristic electroencephalography (EEG) pattern is seen, known as polymorphic delta activity. The MDR certified medical device "Deltascan" can detect this EEG pattern. Traditional clinical delirium screening instruments are known to have limited sensitivity, in particular for detecting hypoactive delirium. We hypothesize that adding EEG based encephalopathy detection to clinical observation scales increases the sensitivity and results in earlier detection of delirium and subsyndromal delirium, resulting in improved clinical outcomes of critically ill patients, such as delirium duration, ICU length of stay or survival. Objective: This randomized controlled trial aims to study the effect of implementation of EEG based encephalopathy detection (DeltaScan, Prolira, Utrecht, The Netherlands, hereafter: DeltaScan) on relevant clinical endpoints (ICU length of stay, sedative requirements and delirium related complications, among others) in a mixed medical and surgical intensive care unit population. Study design: a randomized controlled trial Study population: adult patients (>18 years) admitted to the ICU for unplanned care with a minimal anticipated ICU length of stay of 48h. Intervention: either usual care, where the patients' medical team obtains regular delirium screening, versus usual care plus twice daily DeltaScan measurements. During the daily medical rounds, the DeltaScan results will be presented to the patients' medical team together with decision support, consisting of DeltaScan trend interpretation and protocol-based suggestions for evaluation of underlying delirium cause. Main study parameters/endpoints: primary endpoint will be ICU length of stay. Secondary endpoints are encephalopathy/delirium occurrence, ICU encephalopathy/delirium free days, ventilator free days, organ support free days, sedative, opioid and antipsychotic drug requirement, delirium related complication occurrence, frequency and duration of physical restraints application, ICU mortality, ICU readmission, hospital length of stay, hospital mortality and 90-day mortality. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: In this study, it is not expected that randomization to the intervention group adds risk for patients. This is a study of a diagnostic intervention with additional encephalopathy/delirium observations consisting of a short (90 seconds) EEG measurement, which does not harm the patient. Clinicians will receive protocol-based decision support alongside the diagnostic observation. No additional medical treatments will be conducted as part of the study protocol.
The LIMS study is an observational study that investigates the effectiveness of an online lifestyle program for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). The patients will be monitored during 27 months, starting 3 months prior to the start of the lifestyle program.
Still many advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients do not benefit from PD-(L)1 inhibition or will eventually develop progression through secondary resistance. Inhibition of CTLA-4, application of radiotherapy together with PD-1 inhibition showed synergistic effects and is deemed safe.
The investigators want to evaluate the feasibility of a decentralised hepatitis C care pathway (the Chain of Addiction Care (CAC) pathway) in several addiction care centres in the east of the Netherlands. Secondary objective: to measure the impact of hepatitis C clearance on MET (+metabolite) and BUP (+metabolite) trough levels in patients on Opioid substitution Therapy (OST). This is an exploratory, observational study.
In this study, researchers will learn more about a study drug called BIIB080. The study will focus on participants with mild cognitive impairment or mild dementia due to AD. The main question researchers are trying to answer is if BIIB080 can slow the worsening of AD more than placebo. It will focus on what dose of BIIB080 slows worsening of AD the most. To help answer this question, researchers will use the Clinical Dementia Rating-Sum of Boxes, also known as the CDR-SB. - Clinicians use the CDR-SB to measure several categories of dementia symptoms. - The results for each category are added together for a total score. Lower scores are better. Researchers will also learn more about the safety of BIIB080. The study will be split into 2 parts. The 1st part is the Placebo-Controlled Period. The 2nd part is the Long-Term Extension Period. The 2nd part of the study will help researchers learn about the long-term safety of BIIB080, and how it affects the participant's daily life, thinking, and memory abilities in the longer term. A description of how the study will be done is given below. - After screening, participants will first receive either a low dose or high dose of BIIB080, or a placebo, as an injection into the fluid around the spinal cord (cerebrospinal fluid). A placebo looks like the study drug but contains no real medicine. - Participants will receive BIIB080 or placebo once every 12 weeks or 24 weeks. - After 76 weeks of treatment in the Placebo-Controlled Period, eligible participants will move onto the Extension Treatment period, which will last 96 weeks. - In the extension period, participants who received placebo will be switched to high dose BIIB080 every 12 or 24 weeks. - Participants may be in the study for up to 201 weeks, or about 4 years. This includes the screening and follow-up periods. - Participants can continue to take certain medications for AD. Participants must be on the same dose of medication for at least 8 weeks before the screening period. - After the screening period, most participants will visit the clinic every 6 weeks.
This study aims to test the effectiveness of an evidence-based eating-disorder prevention program specifically targeted for individuals with Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) compared to an educational control group. The Diabetes Body Project (DBP), is an adaptation of the Body Project which is the only eating disorder prevention program to have repeatedly produced effects when evaluated by independent researchers, produced stronger effects than credible alternative interventions, and affected objective outcomes. DBP has been adapted slightly for individuals with T1D who are at ultra-high risk for eating disorders. The study aims to test the effectiveness of the DBP of reducing body image concerns and reducing eating pathology and improving glycemic control.
In this study the researchers want to retrospectively compare non-refluxing ureteroneocystostomy (UNC techniques to reflux UNC techniques in paediatric kidney recipients with regard to urinary tract infections and uteral obstruction.
Single-centre, observational within-subject design: patients that undergo phlebotomies regularly for polycythemia will be measured continuously by wearables one week before until one week after a phlebotomy, for three phlebotomies.
This study is researching an experimental drug called garetosmab. The study is focused on adult patients with fibrodysplasia ossificans progressiva (FOP). The aim of the study is to see how safe and effective the study drug is in patients with FOP. The study is looking at several other research questions, including: - What side effects may happen from receiving the study drug - How much study drug is in your blood at different times - Whether the body makes antibodies against the study drug (which could make the drug less effective or could lead to side effects)