There are about 1295 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Lithuania. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of inotuzumab ozogamicin plus rituximab in relapsed/refractory aggressive Non-Hodgkin lymphoma patients who are not candidates for intensive high-dose chemotherapy. Specifically, the goal is to demonstrate the superiority of this combination compared with an active comparator arm (investigator's choice of rituximab+bendamustine or rituximab+gemcitabine) using the primary endpoint of overall survival.
AMG 479 is an investigational fully human monoclonal antibody that targets type 1 insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-1R). Signaling through IGF-1R plays an important role in the regulation of cell growth and survival. Gemcitabine is administered on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle, AMG 479 or placebo is administered on days 1 and 15 of the 28 day cycle, both are administered intravenously. The primary purpose of the study is to determine if AMG 479 and gemcitabine improves overall survival as compared to placebo and gemcitabine.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of golimumab (CNTO 148) in patients who have active juvenile idiopathic arthritis (JIA) and at least 5 joints with active arthritis that have poor response to methotrexate.
This is a multicenter, phase III, randomized, subject and sponsor-blinded, placebo-controlled study to determine the treatment effect of "Anagrelide retard" in subjects with Essential Thrombocythaemia (ET) at "defined risk" (definition of risk criteria: see Inclusion Criteria Section 5.1) The study is planned as a 2-stage procedure according to Bauer and Köhne: After recruitment of 140 subjects an interim analysis with re-assessment of sample size is planned in an adaptive manner. As the confirmatory analysis will be based on a time-to-event evaluation (i.e. time to 1st clinically significant ET related event), there is no stipulated observation time identically applying for all subjects. Yet, with an interim analysis being performed after having recruited 140 subjects - which is expected to be reached after 1 year - the estimated observation time for a subject in stage I will also be about 1 year. (Details are explained in the section "Statistical Considerations"). Subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the following two arms: Group A: Anagrelide retard Group B: Placebo An a priori stratification is planned for the JAK-2 mutational status. For exploratory purposes a post hoc stratification is used for obtaining covariate adjusted results, for the following other potentially predictive factors: sex, age, Factor V Leiden, and BMI. Dosing will be started with 1 tablet per day for week 1 and will be titrated up according to response (platelet reduction) to 2 tablets in week 2. Dosing may be further increased or decreased according to platelet response in week 3 and 4. However, the maximum dose is 4 tablets (=8mg) per day. After week 4, the maximum dose to achieve optimal platelet counts (<450 G/L) should be maintained (for visit schedule see study flow chart section IV). To verify a treatment response, platelet counts must be evaluated at every visit. The platelet count values will be withheld from the subjects for the duration of stage I or stage II respectively. The subjects have to agree explicitly to this procedure by signing the Informed Consent form. This is a patient and sponsor-blinded clinical study. The trial medical is packaged in the blinded fashion to keep the patient unaware (blinded) towards the actual treatment group they were randomized to. The sponsor functions (including medical monitor, pharmacovigilance manager, clinical project manager, trial data manager and trial statistician) with stay blinded in the course of the study until the database lock. Randomization scheme will be prepared by an independent statistician (not otherwise involved in the study), and will be stored securely with no access to it by the sponsor functions mentioned above. The process of randomization (provision of the individual drug-allocation information to the subjects) will be carried out by a trained staff by Harrison, in adherence to the procedures to keep the other blinded functions unaware of this information (blinded). Unblinding envelopes, which contain the treatment code per patient number for identification of treatment in case when a safety-relevant unblinding needed, will be stored at the sponsor's site. At the end of the study, verification of the extent of maintaining the blind by checking if the envelopes have been broken, will take place and will be properly documented. If the sealed envelope will broken to provide treatment identification, the date of breaking the code, the initials of the person who broke the code and the reason will be stated on the envelope. The operational details on the blinding procedures are outlined in the relevant working guidelines (ARETA Study Working Guideline for idv staff and ARETA Study Working Guideline for Harrison, each in its current version). Investigator will not be blinded in this study, i.e. in case of a medical need individual patient management will be driven by the full knowledge of the trial related interventions. For the case, the sponsor will need to unblind a patient (e.g. due to safety reasons), the above mentioned (in this section) envelopes will be used. Only treatment naïve subjects, in respect to cytoreductive drugs with confirmed diagnosis of ET (centralized re-evaluation according to WHO, 2008; see Section 6.2.1) and assessment of JAK-2 status (centralized re-evaluation of JAK-2 status; see Section 6.2.2) will be enrolled. As described above, stage I of the study will be considered as closed as soon as 140 subjects have been recruited. The duration of stage II depends on the result of the re-assessment of sample size. Once stage I is finished, stage I subjects will enter into an extension period for a maximum of three years.
This multicentre study was a randomized, controlled, parallel, patient-blinded, two-arm superiority trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio that followed the CONSORT guidelines.The aim of this study was to investigate whether MTA is more effective than a conventional calcium hydroxide liner (Dycal®) as a direct pulp capping material in mature molar teeth with a carious pulpal exposure.
This study is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two different dosing regimens of 0.5 mg ranibizumab given as intravitreal injection in comparison to verteporfin PDT in patients with visual impairment due to choroidal neovascularization (CNV) secondary to pathologic myopia (PM).
A Phase III, multicentre, randomised, double blind, placebo-controlled study in subjects having anal fissure (AF) with AF-related pain. Subjects will undertake a 1-week screening period to provide baseline data and for assessment of eligibility. At the Baseline visit (Week 0), eligible subjects (having an average Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) score of >4 for worst pain associated with or following defaecation) will be randomised on a 1:1:1 basis to one of the three treatment groups. Subjects will receive diltiazem hydrochloride 2% cream or diltiazem hydrochloride 4% cream or placebo cream. Study treatment will be applied in and around the anus, three times daily, for up to 8 weeks. Following the Week 0 Visit, subjects will be contacted by telephone during Week 1 to ensure adequate compliance with study treatment, to ensure that study drug is being tolerated and that any concomitant medications are used at a level consistent with that prior to randomisation. Subjects will return to the clinic for safety and efficacy assessments at Weeks 2, 4, and 8 and receive a follow-up telephone call at Week 12, following cessation of therapy. Concomitant laxatives and stool softeners will be permitted, as needed, during the entire study period (screening and treatment) to ensure that constipation or passage of hard stools does not confound evaluation or improvement of the condition. Fibre supplements will be allowed but should be continued at the baseline level. Instructions on the use of the Interactive Voice Response System (IVRS) diary will be issued to subjects to record fissure-related pain (NRS) and bowel symptoms daily during the 1-week screening period, to confirm eligibility and post-randomisation to record worst anal pain associated with or following defaecation (NRS) and daily overall AF-related pain (NRS). A record of the number of times the subject has defaecated, laxative and analgesic usage will also be made as well as the number of applications of study treatment, any changes to concurrent medications and any Adverse Events (AEs). In addition, at some or all study visits, subjects will record the Patient's Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I) on a 7 point Likert scale, complete a Short Form 36 (SF-36) quality of life questionnaire and will undergo examination of their AF. Routine blood samples will be taken and the Skin Irritation Score (SIS) recorded for safety evaluations. Subjects may receive permitted medications for pain per Entry Criteria, but these should remain stable, where possible, up to the Week 8 Visit. Introduction of any new medication for AF will not be permitted unless the Investigator deems "rescue" intervention necessary. A subject will be deemed a treatment failure if rescue intervention is required and will have to be withdrawn from the study. Any subject leaving the study following randomisation for any reason will be asked to complete the Early Withdrawal Visit. This includes subjects who withdraw due to the development of AEs or intolerance, as well as subjects who require rescue intervention. These subjects will return for safety follow-up visits at their previously scheduled follow-up assessment appointments. If complete healing has occurred at the 2 or 4 Week visits, (i.e. prior to the end of the 8-week treatment period), subjects will be asked to continue applying the medication for the full 8 week course, up to the final assessment. Following the Week 8 visit (or Early Withdrawal Visit), subjects will be followed up for a further 4 weeks (following cessation of study medication) to note any AEs. All routine blood analyses (haematology and biochemistry) and plasma levels of diltiazem and of its principal metabolites will be analysed by central laboratories.
Evidence regarding optimal methods of insulin dose adjustment is lacking in the literature. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of two approaches to escalate prandial insulin therapy in participants with type 2 diabetes mellitus not achieving adequate glycemic control on basal insulin.
The primary purpose of this study is to help answer if LY2127399 is safe and effective during long-term treatment in participants with Rheumatoid Arthritis. This study is comprised of 2 periods: Period 1: Unblinded treatment for up to 240 weeks for participants who enroll from Study H9B-MC-BCDO (BCDO) (NCT01202760) or Study H9B-MC-BCDV (BCDV) (NCT01202773) or up to 168 weeks for participants who enroll from Study H9B-MC-BCDM (BCDM) (NCT01198002). Period 2: 48-week post-treatment follow-up
The primary purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of treatment with Kiacta in adult patients with AA Amyloidosis.