There are about 21062 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Italy. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is considered the gold standard treatment for patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Nasal and oronasal masks are often used interchangeably and are generally believed to be equally effective; the choice of interface for OSA therapy remains largely based on clinical judgement and patients preference. However, there is increasing evidence that CPAP delivered by an oronasal mask may be less effective, requires more pressure and are worse tolerated than nasal mask. Patients with OSA on oronasal mask are also less adherent to CPAP. Some authors have suggested that in some subjects, the CPAP was not effective when an oronasal mask was used. Moreover when pressures are increased to overcome the obstruction, a paradoxical obstruction may take place. Specific mechanisms explaining upper-airway obstruction events remain unclear and it is not known how many patients exhibit this behavior. This observational retrospective study is designed to compare a group of patients with obstructive sleep apnea with persistent obstructive events using oronasal masks during CPAP, that were fully recovered with the shift to nasal one with the same or also lower pressure, versus a control group of patients who did not report obstruction with oronasal masks. Aim of the study was to find differences in term of clinical, anatomical and physiological characteristics between these two groups.
This is a single arm, open label, multi centre phase III study to evaluate the efficacy and long term safety of lomitapide in paediatric patients with HoFH receiving stable LLT (including LA, when applicable) comprising of the following phases: - Screening Period (starting at Week 12, i.e. ≤12 weeks prior to Baseline for up to 6 weeks) - Stratified Enrolment and Start of Run in Period (starting at minimum at Week 6, i.e., 6 weeks prior to Baseline for a minimum of 6 weeks): - Efficacy Phase (starting at Baseline, i.e. Day [D] 0 for 24 weeks±3 days - Safety Phase (starting at Week 24±3 days for 80±1 weeks)
The objective of this study is to assess safety and efficacy of CAB-AXL-ADC in NSCLC
CTEPH-SOLUTION aims to create a risk score for the early detection of Chronic Thrombo-Embolic Pulmonary Hypertension (CTEPH) among patients with previous pulmonary embolism. The risk score, created on retrospective data, will be validated on newly diagnosed pulmonary embolism patients.
The SAVE-MORE is a pivotal, confirmatory, phase III randomized clinical trial (RCT) aiming to evaluate the efficacy and safety of early start of anakinra guided by suPAR in patients with LRTI by SARS-CoV-2 in improving the clinical state of COVID-19 over 28 days as measured by the ordinal scale of the 11-point World Health Organization (WHO) clinical progression scale (CPS).
The primary objective is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of efavaleukin alfa in subjects with active systemic lupus erythematosus.
Aim of this study was to investigate the effects of 6-month ballroom dance (3 times/wk) on physical fitness and reaction time in twenty- four experienced older adults. Body composition, handgrip test, standing long jump test, step test, one-legged stance balance test, and reaction time (RT) test were assessed before and after 6 months (T6) of dance practice. RT was re-evaluated after 4 months (T10).
This is a Phase 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized study designed to investigate whether tafasitamab and lenalidomide as an add-on to rituximab provides improved clinical benefit compared with lenalidomide as an add-on to rituximab in patients with R/R FL Grade 1 to 3a or R/R MZL.
This study is an open label, phase IIa trial in subjects with Myelofibrosis
Carotid artery disease is a main cause of ischemic stroke and vascular dementia, and a highly prevalent disease. There is uncertainty about the optimal management of patients with serendipitously or systematically detected asymptomatic carotid artery disease, due to the paucity of information on the predictive features of serious vascular events. While percent diameter stenosis is currently the accepted standard to decide about local interventions (carotid artery stenting or endarterectomy), international guidelines also recommend the evaluation of qualitative features of carotid artery disease as a guide to treatment. There is, however, no agreement on which qualitative features are best predictors of events. Furthermore, a role for metabolic plaque profile, local mechanical and hemorheologic factors in triggering microembolization and silent ischemic events has been proposed from experimental studies. This inadequate knowledge leads to a poor ability to identify patients at higher risk and to an unwarranted dispersion of medical resources, lack of standardization in diagnostic methods, and the use of expensive and resource-consuming techniques. Against this background, the investigators aim at: 1. Prospectively identifying the best predictors of (silent and overt) ischemic stroke and vascular dementia in patients with asymptomatic subcritical carotid artery disease, by identifying the non-invasive diagnostic features of the "vulnerable carotid plaque" as a possible guide for optimal - local and systemic - treatment. 2. Transferring new ultrasound techniques possibly improving risk prediction to the clinical field 3. Assess whether "smart", low-cost diagnostic methods, such as ultrasound-based evaluations integrating established and advanced techniques, may yield at least the same level of prospective information as more expensive and less cost-effective techniques.