There are about 21062 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Italy. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This is a Phase 2/3, multiregional, two-arm, double-blind, randomized, active (standard-of-care)-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of tividenofusp alfa (DNL310), an investigational central nervous system (CNS)-penetrant enzyme-replacement therapy (ERT) for mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II). Participants may also qualify to enter an open-label treatment phase with DNL310 or idursulfase based on pre-specified criteria.
Combined chemotherapy consisting of endovenous Nabpaclitaxel-Gemcitabine and Nabpaclitaxel-PIPAC may be a promising treatment for patients affected by pancreatic cancer PM who are in need of curative options. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the antitumoral activity of combined Nabpaclitaxel-PIPAC and systemic Nabpaclitaxel-Gemcitabine chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer peritoneal metastases. Secondary objectives include the evaluation of the feasibility, the safety, further assessment of the antitumoral activity, the overall and progression free survival, the QoL, the pharmacokinetics of Nabpaclitaxel PIPAC. Furthermore, the study aims to evaluate the patients' nutritional status and the molecular evolution of PM along treatment with a time-course translational research.
The goal of this clinical study is test how well the study drug, axicabtagene ciloleucel, works in participants with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma
During the postoperative period, it is possible to observe the development of acute pain, which lasts no longer than a week after surgery. However, sometimes some patients see the prolongation of this pain beyond the healing time of the tissue, turning into a chronic condition. Persistent postoperative pain is a disease with a complex and still unknown etiology, affecting between 5 and 75% of the population. The development of persistent postoperative pain is a rather important issue since the physician managing the patient must on the one hand ensure adequate analgesia, and on the other hand, minimize the risk of continued opioid use in the case of chronicization. In a study conducted analyzing the prevalence of persistent postoperative pain in various surgeries it was seen to occur more frequently in limb amputation (prevalence >85%), thoracotomy (prevalence 48%), knee arthroplasty (prevalence 44%), laminectomies, and spinal arthrodesis (prevalence 5-46%), and hip replacement (prevalence 27%) making this type of pain more frequent in the patient undergoing orthopedic surgery. As the mechanisms behind its development have not yet been fully clarified, efforts to study the clinical factors associated with the onset of this pathology have been attempted. As there is no way in the literature to stratify the risk of the population in order to prevent the development of postoperative pain, based on the variables reported by different studies, it was decided to administer in patients referred to the Orthopedics and Traumatology 1 U and Orthopedics and Traumatology 3 U department at the Orthopedic Trauma Center of Turin questionnaires to assess the development of chronic pain for screening purposes and to contribute to the improvement of the long-term management of these patients in the postoperative period.
Pain management is a crucial aspect of the care of hip fracture patients. Patients with poorly controlled pain have an increased risk of delirium, long-term functional impairment, and remain hospitalized longer. Today, to relieve hip fracture pain, fascia iliaca block is routinely performed in the emergency department in addition to other pain medications administered by vein or by mouth. Several studies have questioned the analgesic efficacy of this block, suggesting the superiority of the newer PENG block. The purpose of this multicenter, randomized study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of PENG block versus fascia iliaca block, hypothesizing the superiority of the new approach over the gold standard. Participants will be blindly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the study or control group, recruited from the Emergency Departments of IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo and Colchester Hospital (UK). The main outcome is represented by the reduction of pain after the two blocks, measured as %SPID (percentage of "pain intensity difference"), a value derived from VAS scale measurements in the first hour post-procedure. Secondly, we will evaluate the proportion of patients with satisfactory pain control, the amount of opioids used and the safety profile of the two approaches.
The primary aim of this study is to evaluate whether the effect of HA in combination with XCM for the treatment of MAGRs with a multiple coronally advanced flap technique (mCAF) achieves better results than the XCM with mCAF alone in terms of recession reduction (primary outcome) and other secondary root coverage outcomes (e.g. complete root coverage, mean root coverage). Moreover, this study aims to compare secondary clinical variables (e.g. keratinized tissue width (KTW) changes, probing pocket depth (PPD) changes, volumetric gain (VG), etc.), also with a digital approach, the patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs e.g. pain, swelling, bleeding) and lastly the expression of molecular mediators of tissue healing/regeneration. The hypothesis of this study is that at 6 months and 1 year follow-up the mCAF with XCM+HA is superior to the mCAF with only XCM in terms of recessions reduction and secondary clinical variables, including PROMs.
An open-label post authorization efficacy and safety study evaluating graft failure-free survival at 1-year in highly sensitized end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients with positive crossmatch (XM) against a deceased donor prior to desensitized with imlifidase and subsequent kidney transplantation. Two non-comparative reference cohorts are included to assess the impact of differences in post-transplantation management and outcome in less sensitized patients.
This is a Phase 3, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, safety and efficacy study of contezolid acefosamil (IV)/contezolid (PO) compared with linezolid (IV and PO) administered for a total of 14 to 28 days in adult subjects with moderate or severe DFI.
This study will evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy of AZD5305 when given in combination with new hormonal agents (NHAs) in patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer.
Endometriosis is the presence of endometrial glands and stroma outside the uterine cavity. About 5% of women of reproductive age suffer from the disease. The pelvis is the most frequent site of endometriotic lesion and the most common pelvic localisations are peritoneal, ovarian, and deep infiltrating endometriosis. However, endometriosis can also localize outside the pelvis, for example involving the umbilicus, omentum, appendix, liver, diaphragm, pleura and lungs, vulva, and surgical scars. The majority of extrapelvic endometriosis implants are located in the skin, and most of them are of iatrogenic origin, following laparotomy, laparoscopic procedures, and episiotomies; only a minority of cases are of primary origin. Umbilical endometriosis is a very rare presentation of endometriosis (0.5-1% of cases of extrapelvic endometriosis). Pathogenetic hypotheses of primary umbilical endometriosis include: hematic or lymphatic dissemination of endometrial cells from the peritoneum to the umbilicus through obliterated umbilical arteries; migration of endometrial cells through the venous or lymphatic circulation; metaplasia of urachus remnant or release of endometrial cells that during labor and delivery may contaminate the umbilical cord emergence. Secondary umbilical endometriosis is probably due to the proliferation and subsequent dissemination of iatrogenically implanted endometrial cells in laparotomy or laparoscopic scars. In 20% of cases, umbilical endometriosis is associated with pelvic endometriosis. In these patients, it is probable that endometriotic cells may migrate from the endometriotic implants to the umbilical site. This migration process could be favored by fascia defects at the umbilical level. In fact, reports in the literature describe cases of umbilical endometriosis coexisting with umbilical hernia. The clinical presentation consists of an umbilical nodule of variable color (red, blue, black, flesh-colored), ranging in size from 0.5 to 3 cm. Pathognomonic symptoms are: bleeding and/or pain in the umbilical site of catamenial type, cutaneous hyperesthesia. Catamenial symptomatology associated with the nodule, which makes the diagnosis easier, is present in only 75% of cases. In asymptomatic cases the differential diagnosis of the nodule of umbilical endometriosis is more difficult (hernia, hematoma, cyst, dermatological disorders, tumor metastasis). Instrumental examinations useful for differential diagnosis and definition of nodule size include soft tissue ultrasound, CT scan and MRI. Definitive diagnosis is only by histologic examination of the tissue. Exploratory laparoscopy is not indicated unless concomitant pelvic endometriosis is suspected. The recommended treatment of umbilical endometriosis is surgical, consisting of complete removal of the endometriosis nodule, omphalectomy, and subsequent reconstruction of the umbilicus. Recurrence rates after surgery are around 6% at 12 months in a large Japanese court, with no difference between taking and not taking postoperative hormonal therapy, while they are reduced to almost 0% in case of resection including a large portion of peritoneum. Medical therapy, on the other hand, alleviates the associated algic symptoms by reducing the size of the nodule. There are very few data on the efficacy of medical therapy; in a study with a very small number of cases an efficacy of 91.7% with dienogest and 51.1% with estroprogestinic pill is reported. There are no studies comparing medical and surgical therapy for the treatment of umbilical endometriosis. Radical excision is recommended to avoid local recurrences and to avoid the risk of malignant transformation, although it is extremely rare (only 2 cases reported). In literature, spontaneous resolution has been described in only one pregnant woman. To date, few studies have evaluated umbilical endometriosis. Moreover, no study has ever formally compared the long-term efficacy of surgical or medical therapy for umbilical endometriosis. This is a observational, retrospective/prospective and monocentric study; it is based on the review of medical records and on outpatient follow-up visits of patients in our clinic with umbilical endometriosis from 1990. The principal aim of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness of medical and surgical treatments in terms of satisfaction, psychological state, health-related quality of life of patients suffering from this clinical condition. Moreover, global patient's condition and severity of the patient's symptoms are evaluated The secondary aim is to investigate the pathogenetic aspects of this clinical condition.