There are about 21062 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Italy. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Prospective observational study of epidemiological surveillance, multicenter, non-profit, spontaneous, Italian with objective to describe the incidence of CMV infections and diseases in adult and pediatric patients undergoing allo-HSCT during the first 6 months from transplant. This study will evaluate approximately 1500 subjects (with competitive enrolment) from GITMO investigational centers.
This is a multicentric retro-prospective observational study that wants to evaluate the relation between frailty and clinical outcomes in elderly patients with COVID-19.
This multicentric prospective clinical practice study aims at evaluating clinical factors associated with a prolonged invasive mechanical ventilation and other outcomes such as mortality and ICU length of stay in patients affected from COVID-19 related pneumonia and ARDS.
When performing shaving of a rectal endometriotic nodule, the surgeon can use the macroscopic appearance of the nodule and the tactile feedback provided by the laparoscopic instruments to decide the area of the bowel that needs to be excised. Theoretically, compared with segmental bowel resection, the shaving technique may expose the patients to a higher risk of persistence of intestinal endometriosis. The objective of this ultrasonographic study was to assess the risk of rectal endometriosis persistence following laparoscopic shaving of rectovaginal nodules.
To evaluate by intravascular OCT study the presence of microvascular pulmonary thrombosis in patients with COVID-19, high D-dimer levels and contrast CT scan negative for pulmonary thrombosis. We'll also evaluate the extension of microvascular pulmonary thrombosis in patients with contrast CT scan positive for pulmonary embolism in areas where contrast CT scan was negative.
Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus. This virus was identified in December 2019 in the Chinese city of Wuhan, in the province of Hubei, where it determined a state of health emergency proclaimed by China on January 30, 2020. Since February 2020, Italy has been involved in the emergency of the COVID-19 infection, with devastating consequences for the health of the population and the economy of our country. As published by the Italian National Institute of Health, the starting date of the symptoms dates back to the end of January, the first case diagnosed dates back to 21 February 2020 while the first cases of home isolation date back to March 1st, 2020. On March 30, 2020, there were 101739 positive subjects and 11591 deaths (Civil Protection data). According to data published by the World Health Organization, most people with COVID-19 develop a flu-like form, 14% develop a severe form that requires hospitalization and oxygen therapy and 5% require an ICU admission. The emergency from Covid19 made it necessary to provide institutional social distancing conditions which resulted in rehabilitation departments being prohibited from visiting patients by family members and/or caregivers. This event, although necessary, led to the first moment of discomfort on the part of patients and family members; to overcome this reaction "technological" solutions were found, trying to give continuity to the contact between the patient and the family member through the use of video calls. Despite this, the COVID-19 emergency and the limitations resulting from social distancing likely have an impact on both patients and family members/caregivers that needs to be assessed.
This is a multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II clinical trial to evaluate to evaluate the efficacy and safety of first line atezolizumab in combination with paclitaxel and bevacizumab (Avastin®) in patients with advanced or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC)
Bariatric patients represent a peculiar and frail subset of subjects, constantly increasing. During the novel coronavirus disease outbreak, for the lockdown of any non-urgent and non-oncological activity, the access to healthcare services was severely limited, according to the International Federation for the Surgery of Obesity and Metabolic Disorders.
The two biomarkers determined in urine, "Tissue Inhibitor of Metalloproteinases 2 (TIMP-2)" and "Insulin-like Growth Factor-Binding Protein 7 (IGFBP7)", can indicate the occurrence of Acute kidney injury (AKI) in cardiac surgery and critically ill patients at an early stage. However, no data are available whether these parameters can also predict the occurrence of AKI in the context of COVID-19 infection. An early prediction of AKI can be helpful for the optimisation of therapeutic management to improve patient outcome and for the triage of patients. The aim of this observational study is to evaluate whether the biomarker [TIMP- 2]*[IGFBP7] can predict the occurrence of AKI in critically ill patients suffering from SARS-CoV2 associated acute respiratory distress syndrome.
BACKGROUND and RATIONALE Colorectal cancer, with 49,000 new diagnoses expected in 2019 (27,000 in men and 22,000 in women) represents, in Italy, the third neoplasm in men (14%) and the second in women (12%). Increasing attention has been recently paid to the outcomes of surgical treatment, in terms of patient's anorectal function and quality of life (QoL). Currently, the majority of patients affected by rectal carcinoma undergo a sphincter-sparing surgery, that is, a low anterior rectal resection (LAR). It is known that about 50% - 90% of patients undergoing LAR will develop at least some degree of bowel dysfunction: for this reason, the definition of "anterior low rectal resection syndrome" (LARS) has been coined to describe this complex functional condition; the LARS usually includes incontinence to gas and/or liquid or solid stools, constipation, urgency, fragmentation and frequent bowel movements; a worsening of QoL has been also observed. Due to the importance and high prevalence of this condition, but in the absence of a reliable tool for assessing its severity, the so-called "LARS score" has been introduced. The score has already been validated in several languages, even if this important tool has not been validated in Italian language. AIMS of the STUDY The primary aim of this study will be the validation in Italian language of the LARS score in a population of Italian patients with a previous history of rectal cancer and treated by anterior rectal resection surgery. Moreover, the convergent and discriminatory validity, and the reliability of the score will be also assessed. STUDY DESIGN The study will be a prospective observational study on patients affected by rectal cancer and treated by anterior rectal resection surgery with total or partial excision of the mesorectum (TME, total mesorectal excision, or PME, partial mesorectal excision) in the period January 2000 - April 2018. Any Unit of the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "Agostino Gemelli" - IRCCS of Rome that deals with rectal cancer surgery could join the study. METHODS The validated English version of the LARS questionnaire will be translated into Italian. The translation will be performed by two independent professional translators. Based on previous validation studies conducted in other Countries, it has been calculated that the sample size will be 200 patients. Patients will be assessed by administration of the LARS score questionnaire, of a single question on QoL, and of the EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire. Each Unit could choose to assess the patients in the preferred way (clinical follow-up visit, e-mail, ordinary mail); however, the method of administration of the questionnaire must be specified in the final communication of data to the coordinating Group. Each Unit joining the Study will be provided with an Excel data collection sheet which must then be completed. A descriptive analysis of the data will be conducted, and the convergent validity, that is the concordance between the LARS score and the QoL, will be investigated. In addition, discriminatory validity, i.e. the ability of the LARS score to distinguish between subgroups of patients, which usually differ in the LARS score, will be assessed. Finally, the test-retest reliability of the LARS score will be examined, so all patients will receive a second LARS questionnaire 1-2 weeks after completing the first and the results of the two tests will be compared.