There are about 5618 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in India. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
Septic shock is a major life-threatening vasodilatory shock. Vasopressor form a crucial pharmacotherapeutic option and have long been used as the first and foremost recommended therapy.(1) However, some patients may remain refractory to catecholamine, which is also known as catecholamine-resistant septic shock.(2, 3) High-dose catecholamine therapy may lead to potential side effects such as increased myocardial oxygen consumption, lethal arrthymias, and even the high risk of mortality. (4)Therefore, newer alternatives like dopamine, dobutamine, somatostatin, and terlipressin are also used. Cirrhosis is a state of hyperdynamic circulation, which worsens with the onset of infection. In septic shock, there is relative deficiency of vasopressin. (13) The mortality of septic shock in these patients still remains extremely high. Terlipressin is a synthetic vasopressin analogue with greater selectivity for the V1-receptors.(5) In cirrhotics with septic shock, terlipressin has been used either as a continuous intravenous infusion or as intravenous boluses. However, at present none of studies reveal which would be a better mode of administration in cirrhotics with septic shock considering the reversal of hemodynamics and safety of patients.
The reason for this study is to see if the study drug, selpercatinib, compared to placebo is effective and safe in delaying cancer return in participants with early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who have already had surgery or radiation. Participants who are assigned to placebo and stop the study drug because their disease comes back or gets worse have the option to potentially crossover to selpercatinib. Participation could last up to three years.
Background: The JOURNEY II CR Total Knee System consists of femoral component made from oxidized zirconium (OXINIUM) Purpose: Post-market evidence generation for JOURNEY II CR Total Knee System Objectives: Evaluate the performance of JOURNEY II CR TKA in APAC populations Evaluate the impact of patella resurfacing on the outcomes of JOURNEY II CR TKA Research participants / locations: A total of up to 480 knees' information will be collected in up to 15 sites in India, China mainland, Hong Kong, Singapore, Thailand and Japan There will be up to 240 knees for resurfaced patella group and up to 240 knees for un-resurfaced patella group.
CBCT Data Of C-Shaped Canal In Mandibular Second Molar Will Be Assessed For Age.
The Primary Completion Date and Study Completion Date have been updated to reflect completion of the adolescent cohort, which has been added to the protocol. The study is designed as a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, placebo-controlled study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of iptacopan (LNP023) in complement 3 glomerulopathy.
The project is about evaluation of albumin and midodrine versus albumin alone in outcome of refractory ascites in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Cirrhosis is a leading cause of disability and mortality worldwide. Cirrhosis occurs in 50% of patients over 10 years. Decompensated cirrhosis carries a poor prognosis because the median survival time is about 2 years and it imposes a heavy burden on health care costs mainly due to the need for repeated hospital admission. The mortality is approximately 40% at 1 year and 50% at 2 years (12.7 per 100,000 population). A lot of times the prognosis is poor and the main factors leading to it are - AKI/HRS-NAKI, Hyponatremia, Grade of ascites-Refractory ascites, Sarcopenia, low Mean arterial pressure. Post review of the literature, it is realized that there are some gap areas - - It is unknown whether combination of vasoconstrictor with albumin further decreases the need for paracentesis in patients of refractory ascites. - There are no studies till date on using combination of vasoconstrictor with albumin for refractory ascites. - There are no studies evaluating the prevalence and incidence of HRS-NAKI using the new definitions in patients with refractory ascites and impact of combining vasoconstrictor and albumin in improving renal outcomes in these patients.
This is a pilot, cross-sectional, sample collection study to characterize the immune response and intestinal microorganisms in people with and without COVID-19 antibodies and helminth infection.
Surgical margin is a significant prognostic factor in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC)[1,2,3]. Intra-operative frozen section (FS) has been routinely used by the surgeons to achieve adequate surgical margins. However published literature has failed to show a conclusive benefit of FS in improving oncological outcomes(4-7). The overall identification rate of the inadequate margins by FS is variable with figures in the literature ranging from25-34%.(8-10) Revision of margins based on FS is widely practiced in centers where facility for FS is available. However this has not shown to significantly improve local control when compared to cases in which FS was not utilized , in a comparative study done at Tata memorial Hospital(TMH) (5) More-over FS is a costly procedure, and sparsely available in resource- poor countries. In a recently conducted retrospective study of 1237 patients conducted at TMH, the cost benefit ratio of FS for assessment of margin is as low as 12:1(11). In another prospective study performed at the same center , investigators found that gross examination (GE) of margins by the surgeons was as effective as FS, and achievement of gross 7mm margin all around the tumor obviated the need for FS (12). In a recent meta-analysis of 8 studies that looked at the utility of frozen section and had uniformity in frozen section analysis and definition of close margins, they concluded that revision of margins based on FS does not improve oncological outcomes and further prospective studies are needed to explore this contentious issue (13). With this background, a prospective RCT is planned to explore if gross examination by surgeon and subsequent revision of margin (if necessary) is an equally effective alternative to Frozen section based revision in a randomized controlled trial.
COVID-19 pandemic, caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), had caused widespread impact on health, including substantial mortality among those with pre-existing health conditions including cirrhosis. Patients with liver cirrhosis are at increased risk of severe disease and death from the virus infection that causes COVID-19 and are therefore a priority for immunization, should an efficacious vaccine be developed. Currently, there are no specific treatments available against COVID-19 and cirrhosis patients are a priority group for vaccination.
Upper Gastrointestinal bleed is a common presentation in a medical emergency. Patients generally present with hematemesis, melena or in severe cases hematochezia. Incidence and etiology vary from region as well as the level of health care facility. In the US, UGI bleed accountsfor about 300000 admissions per year (6). India has a huge burden of UGI bleed. A study in India showed 4.6% of hospitaladmissions were due to UGI bleed (7). As per the medical record of PGIMER, 2-3 patients of UGIbleed are admitted to the EMOPD every day. Upper GI bleed is anatomically defined as any gastrointestinal bleed originating proximal to ligamentof treitz (8). Causes of UGI bleed are generally divided into variceal and non-variceal in origin. The common etiology of non-variceal bleed are Peptic Ulcer disease (PUD), esophagitis, erosive Gastritis, vascular malformations, Mallory Weiss tear and GI malignancies.Variceal hemorrhage is usually secondary to esophageal varices, but alsocan be due to gastric varices and ectopic varices of the upper GI tract(9).Non-varicealcauses are more common as compared to variceal bleed (10) and among this PUD is the most common (10).But there is recent rising trend of variceal bleed secondary to chronic liver disease and portal hypertension .As per a recently published institutional study, variceal bleed constituted 45.7% of UGI bleed (11). Morbidity and mortality associated with UGI bleed are significantly high.Variceal bleed is becoming a major concern in tertiarycare centers and carries a higher mortality as compared to non variceal bleed(12 ).Clinical severity of UGI bleed may vary from being insignificant to fatal. Mortality from UGI bleed may vary from 2 to 5% where as it around 10-30% in cases of re-bleed (12). Prompt UGI endoscopic procedure is diagnostic as well as therapeutic which should be done ideally within first 24hrsalong with airway, volume and blood resuscitative measures (13).High dose proton pump inhibitors(PPI) are used for non-variceal bleed where as splanchnic vasoconstrictorsare used in variceal bleed along with endoscopic procedure like injection of Epinephrine, Sclerosants, application of haemostatic material like hemoclips/endoclips, over the scope clips, glue or tissue adhesive, haemostatic powder/spray. Beside these endoscopic bipolar electro coagulation, heater probe coagulation, argon plasma coagulator, laser photocoagulation can also be done as and when required. For variceal bleed endoscopic variceal band ligation (EVL) is the main stay of therapy. However routine use of antifibrinolytic agent hasn't been recommended in the guidelines for management of acute UGI bleed. Studies have shown that fibrinolysis may play an important role in GI bleeding dueto premature breakdown of fibrin blood clots at the bleeding site (14). Studies have also shown that many patients with acute UGI bleed have elevated levels of fibrin degradation products (a surrogate marker for fibrinolysis) and that is associated with worse outcomes (14). Fibrinolysisalso contributes to the risk of re-bleed.Literature review suggests that early administration ofTranexamic acid (TXA) reduces mortality due to bleeding in trauma patients (15) and effective in controlling bleeding in menorrhagia (16). Our own institutional study showed that TXA is effective as a bridging therapy in controlling bleeding from haemoptysis before definitive therapeutic intervention done (1). A systematic COCHRANE review of TXA in UGI bleed identified 7 trials (3). These trials showed statistically significant reduction in mortality and reduced need ofsurgical interventions in patients receiving TXA. However the trials had many fallacieslike small sample size, number of biases. The NICE guideline doesn't include TXA inthe management of GI bleed (4). So far studies on use of TXA in UGI bleed haven't been able to either recommend or refute the use of TXA in UGI bleed (3). There is also lack of study form India and the Southeast Asia regarding the efficacy of TXA in UGI bleed. TXA, an anti-fibrinolytic agent, inhibits fibrinolysis by displacing plasminogen from fibrin. So, TXA may have role in bleeding control and preventing re-bleed in acute UGI bleed by stabilization of the clot formation. This study will evaluate the efficacy of early administration of TXA in acute onset UGIbleed, in term of bleeding control, preventing re-bleeding and mortality.