There are about 9745 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in Israel. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
B-cell Lymphoma is an aggressive and rare cancer of a type of immune cell (a white blood cell responsible for fighting infections). The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and tolerability of epcoritamab in combination with anti-neoplastic agents in adult participants with Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Adverse events and change in disease activity will be assessed. Epcoritamab is an investigational drug being developed for the treatment of NHL. Study doctors put the participants in groups called treatment arms. The combination of epcoritamab with anti-neoplastic agents will be explored. Each treatment arm receives a different treatment combination depending on eligibility. Approximately 394 adult participants with NHL will be enrolled in 100 sites globally. In both the dose escalation and dose expansion arms participants will receive subcutaneous (SC) epcoritamab in 28-day or 21 day cycles dependent on the arm in combination with the anti-neoplastic agents described below: 1: Oral lenalidomide in participants with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL); 2: Oral ibrutinib and oral lenalidomide in participants with with R/R DLBCL; 3: Intravenous (IV) polatuzumab vedotin, IV rituximab, IV cyclophosphamide, IV doxorubicin hydrochloride (HCl), and oral prednisone (pola-R-CHP) in participants with newly diagnosed treatment-naïve DLBCL; 4: Oral CC-99282 in participants with R/R DLBCL; 5: Oral CC-99282 in participants with R/R follicular lymphoma (FL); 6A: Oral ibrutinib in participants with R/R mantle cell lymphoma (MCL); 6B: Oral ibrutinib, and oral venetoclax in participants with R/R MCL; 7: Oral ibrutinib, and oral venetoclax in participants with newly diagnosed treatment-naïve MCL. There may be higher treatment burden for participants in this trial compared to their standard of care. Participants will attend regular visits during the study at an approved institution (hospital or clinic). The effect of the treatment will be frequently checked by medical assessments, blood tests, questionnaires and side effects.
The main objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of satralizumab compared with placebo based on time from randomization to the first occurrence of an adjudicated MOGAD relapse in the double-blind (DB) treatment period
Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) candidates will be comprehensively evaluated at our center, including clinical evaluation, echocardiography, right heart catheterization, cardiopulmonary exercise test and laboratory exams. following this evaluation, patients will be treated with inotropes, diuretics, uptitrated neurohormonal therapy. vitamin and iron deficiencies will be corrected and the patients will be referred for coronary interventions and cardiac resynchronization therapy appropriately. The need for LVAD implantation will be reevaluated according to the patient's clinical condition, echocardiography and laboratory findings.
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of tulisokibart in participants with SSc-ILD.
The purpose of the first part of the study (subgroup R&D) is to demonstrate the safety and performance of the C-Scan system and to collect data in order to improve the analysis process. The purpose of the second part of the study (subgroup pre-pivotal) is to determine the ability of the C-Scan System to identify elevated risk subjects
The overall purpose of this two-part study is to evaluate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of iptacopan (LNP023) in addition to standard of care treatment.
This is a multi-center study to compare the efficacy and safety of itolizumab versus placebo as first-line therapy for subjects with Grade III-IV aGVHD or Grade II with LGI involvement, in combination with corticosteroids
This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of depemokimab compared with mepolizumab in adults with relapsing or refractory EGPA receiving SoC therapy.
Cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) is a helpful tool for evaluation of aerobic exercise capacity and tolerance for variety of population. CPET provides a full assessment of the physiologic responses of the pulmonary, cardiovascular, muscular, and cellular oxidative systems to exercise. The test progression include a incremental stepwise (on treadmill) or ramp control protocol (on bike ergometer ) to exhaustion. Measurement of respiratory gas exchange i.e. oxygen uptake, carbon dioxide, minute ventilation, other variables while monitoring ECG, blood pressure, pulse oximetry and exertion perceived (Borg Scale) during an incremental test . Aim: To compere exercise responses for maximal exercise testing with different population.
PROTOCOL SYNOPSIS Clinical Protocol ESR-20-20907 Study Title: Durvalumab (MEDI4736) plus platinum-based chemotherapy in advanced large-cell neuroendocrine tumors of lung (LCNEC): a pilot phase II study Protocol Number: ESR-20-20907 Clinical Phase: phase II Study Duration: 30 months Investigational Product(s) and Reference Therapy: Investigational Product: Durvalumab (MEDI4736) Durvalumab concentrate for solution for infusion will be supplied in glass vials containing 500 mg durvalumab at a concentration of 50 mg/mL Reference Therapy: Cisplatin/Carboplatin+Etoposide Research Hypothesis Primary hypothesis: 1.1 In patients with advanced treatment naive LCNEC, treatment with Durvalumab+ Cisplatin/Carboplatin+Etoposide is associated with 12-month PFS rate of at least 18%. Secondary hypothesis: 1.2 In patients with advanced treatment naïve LCNEC, treatment with Durvalumab+ Cisplatin/Carboplatin+Etoposide is associated with ORR of 50%. 1.3 In patients with advanced treatment naïve LCNEC, treatment with Durvalumab+ Cisplatin/Carboplatin+Etoposide is associated with 12-months OS rate of at least 50%. 1.4 Incidence of grade ≥3 adverse events is less than 60%. Exploratory hypothesis: 1.5 There is a positive correlation between the small-cell lung cancer-like molecular subtype and efficacy parameters (ORR, PFS, OS), and also between high TMB and efficacy parameters (ORR, PFS, OS) of treatment with Durvalumab+Cisplatin/Carboplatin+Etoposide in patients with advanced treatment naive LCNEC. Objectives Primary Objective: 1.1 To assess progression-free survival (PFS at 12 months, RECIST v. 1.1) with Durvalumab+ Cisplatin/Carboplatin+Etoposide in patients with advanced treatment-naive LCNEC. Secondary Objectives: 1.2 To assess objective response rate (ORR at best response) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, v. 1.1 (RECIST v. 1.1) with Durvalumab+ Cisplatin/Carboplatin+Etoposide in patients with advanced treatment naive LCNEC. 1.3 To assess overall survival (OS at 12 months) with Durvalumab+ Cisplatin/Carboplatin+Etoposide in patients with advanced treatment-naive LCNEC. 1.4 To further evaluate the safety profile of Durvalumab+Cisplatin/Carboplatin+Etoposide in patients with advanced treatment naive LCNEC (CTCAE v. 5.0). Exploratory Objectives: 1.5 To assess the predictive effect of tumor molecular subtype (small-cell lung cancer - like versus non-small cell lung cancer - like, assessed by NGS), tumor mutational burden (TMB, mut/Mb assessed by NGS) and PD-L1 (assessed by TPS - by IHC using 22C3 antibody) on ORR, PFS, and OS with Durvalumab+Cisplatin/Carboplatin+Etoposide in patients with advanced treatment-naive LCNEC. Study Design: - Open-label non-randomized non-comparative single-center pilot phase 2 study - Response assessment: brain/chest/abdominal/pelvic CT scan every 8 weeks+-7 days - PFS, ORR - assessed by the board-certified radiology expert experienced in RECIST v. 1.1 evaluation; OS assessment Number of Centers: single center Number of Patients: 22 Study Population: Adult patients (aged ≥18 years) with histologically or cytologically documented advanced LCNEC (stage IV or stage III not eligible for definitive treatment) without prior systemic treatment for advanced disease. Investigational Product(s), Dose and Mode of Administration: The enrolled patients will receive IV durvalumab 1500 mg (administered on day 1 of each 21-day cycle), IV etoposide 100 mg/m² (administered on days 1-3 of each 21-day cycle), with investigator's choice of either IV carboplatin area under the curve 5 mg/mL per min or IV cisplatin 80 mg/m² (administered on day 1 of each 21-day cycle) for four cycles followed by maintenance IV durvalumab 1500 mg (administered on day 1 of each 28-day cycle).