Clinical Trials Logo

Filter by:
NCT ID: NCT03591081 Completed - Healed Ulcer Clinical Trials

Induce (Intellin Diabetic Foot) Feasibility Study

Start date: June 22, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This is a novel feasibility study to test the participant acceptance and usability of a specifically designed smart phone app. It will also explore the effects of smart phone technology in improving self-referrals into the diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) service. Furthermore, it will be explored if this increase in self-referrals will influence the outcome of people with diabetes who have recently had a healed foot ulceration.

NCT ID: NCT03590392 Completed - Chikungunya Fever Clinical Trials

Safety and Immunogenicity of a Candidate CHIKV Vaccine (CHIK001)

Start date: July 31, 2018
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

A phase I dose escalation study to assess the safety and immunogenicity of the candidate vaccine ChAdOx1 Chik in healthy volunteers. Volunteers will be recruited and vaccinated in Oxford, England. All vaccinations will be administered intramuscularly. Three different doses will be tested (5x10^9 vp, 2.5x10^10 vp and 5x10^10vp). The total duration of the study will be 26 weeks from the day of enrolment for all volunteers.

NCT ID: NCT03589534 Completed - Pregnancy Testing Clinical Trials

Home Pregnancy Test Evaluation Study

Start date: June 6, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study will evaluate consumer preference and consumer results from a number of commercially available home pregnancy tests. The study is being conducted as a formal assessment home pregnancy tests sold in Western Europe.

NCT ID: NCT03589469 Completed - Clinical trials for Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma Recurrent

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Loncastuximab Tesirine in Patients With Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

LOTIS-2
Start date: August 1, 2018
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this Phase 2 study is to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of Loncastuximab Tesirine (ADCT-402) in patients with relapsed or refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.

NCT ID: NCT03588793 Completed - Phantom Limb Pain Clinical Trials

Reliability and Validity of Outcome Measures for Phantom Limb Pain

Start date: December 10, 2018
Phase:
Study type: Observational

Phantom limb pain (PLP) is experienced by 60-80% of all people who have had an amputation. This persistent pain condition can impact on independence, activities of daily living and overall quality of life. While there is some research into PLP there is no consensus on appropriate outcome measures and there is (to our knowledge) neither guideline nor literature evidence on the reliability and validity of outcomes measures for this patient group. Such measures are vital to the robust evaluation of any interventions and/or monitoring progression. The aim of the proposed study is to assess the reliability and validity of four self-report questionnaires (Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire 2 (SFMPQ-2), Trinity Amputation and Prosthetic Evaluation Scale (TAPES), a health-related quality of life measure (EQ-5D-L), a pain diary, a left/right limb judgement task (Implicit Motor Imagery Testing - IMIT) and the two-point discrimination (TPD)test. The data will be collated and statistically analysed to assess how stable each of the measures are over time (intra session reliability) and how each measure co-relates with the others (validity).

NCT ID: NCT03588663 Completed - Stroke Clinical Trials

Effect of Using a Bionic Leg on Physiological and Biomechanical Measures in Stroke Patients

Start date: August 10, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study will assess the effect of wearing a wearable bionic leg, on the physiological cost index and biomechanical measures in patients with stroke. Patients will be tested during a range of activities (sit-to-stand, walking) with and without the Bionic Leg, and following a 30-min training program.

NCT ID: NCT03587753 Completed - Clinical trials for Fatty Acid Oxidation

Experiment 2: Understanding Liver Fat Metabolism

FATOX
Start date: May 1, 2018
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

There is a largely unsubstantiated thought in the literature that dietary unsaturated enter oxidation pathways preferentially compared to saturated fatty acids. This study is undertaking a direct comparison of the oxidation of dietary saturated and unsaturated fatty acids.

NCT ID: NCT03587428 Completed - Oral Health Clinical Trials

Effect of Two Toothpastes on Bacteria in Saliva

Start date: November 4, 2014
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

This study investigated the ability of two zinc-containing toothpaste formulations (Zinc A and Zinc B) to reduce the level of bacteria in saliva in the two-hour period after their use, compared to the effect of rinsing with water alone.

NCT ID: NCT03587350 Completed - Dystonia Clinical Trials

Assessing Cervical Dystonia

Start date: April 7, 2017
Phase: N/A
Study type: Interventional

The study involves the use of a novel, non-invasive, monitoring device to measure the response to treatment with botulinum toxin injections in 24 (16 Intervention and 8 control) patients with cervical dystonia. A baseline assessment, prior to botulinum treatment,will be structured around validated clinical rating scales for cervical dystonia and questionnaires and the performance of simple neck movements, and will be undertaken while the patient wears a movement sensor attached to the head with an elastic strap. The same assessments will be undertaken at 0, 3, 6, 9 and 12 weeks following treatment to assess response. The patients' treatment will not be affected by their participation in the research. The device readings will then be compared with the clinical ratings to establish whether it might be used as a more sensitive measure of treatment response than clinical assessment alone. This will help clinicians to plan and execute botulinum injections more effectively in future

NCT ID: NCT03586375 Completed - Clinical trials for Intellectual Disability

Intensive Support Teams Study

IST-ID
Start date: August 31, 2018
Phase:
Study type: Observational

About 17% of people with ID living in the community have challenging behaviour such as aggression to others or property, self-injury or hyperactivity. There are concerns that adults with ID and challenging behaviour over-use medication, spend large periods of time in hospital, and miss out on living in the community. Hospital care is expensive, and costs are increasing. NHS England has produced draft guidance about Intensive Support Teams (ISTs) proposing that they should be part of all community ID services in England. However, there is currently very little evidence about how effective ISTs are. The people who pay for Health and Social Care services (commissioners) would like more information, and this project aims to provide this. We propose to do a project over 36 months. It will be in two parts. First we will find out about how many, and what type of ISTs exist in England, by asking service managers about their service, their staff, and the work they do. With this information, we will identify different models of ISTs. Then we will look at several services in each model to compare how they work with people with ID and other local services. We will collect data twice over 9 months to see which model(s) work best. We will also carry out interviews with people who use ISTs, family and paid carers, and referrers to ISTs to find out about their experiences of these services, and how happy they are with them. Analysing and putting this data together will tell us about how effective each of the models are at reducing challenging behaviours, how much they cost, and which one service users, their families and people who work in other connected services prefer most. We will tell people about our results at conferences and in academic and services journals. We will ask our group of involved service-users and family carers to guide us, and help us tell other people about the results. We have a team of clinicians and academics who are experts in all aspects of the research, e.g. statistics, ID, service evaluations, and in running ISTs. We will follow research rules and recommendations to make sure we carry out safe, ethical and rigorous research.