There are about 36633 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in France. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
This is a multicenter, open-label, single arm phase I study evaluating the safety and tolerability as well as some activity parameters of TG4050 in patients with ovarian, fallopian or peritoneal serous carcinoma.
The aim of this research is to study the feasibility of neoadjuvant treatment before chemoradiation in "high risk" HPV-driven Oropharynx cancer
The purpose of the study is to determine the recommended dose of durvalumab and tremelimumab (immunotherapy drugs) in pediatric patients with advanced solid and hematological cancers and expand in a second phase to test the efficacy of these drugs once this dose is determined.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of acalabrutinib in combination with venetoclax and acalabrutinib in combination with venetoclax with and without obinutuzumab compared to chemoimmunotherapy in subjects with previously untreated CLL
The incorporation of proteasome inhibitors and immunomodulatory drugs into the standard of care has improved the outcome for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) over the past 10 years. However, most patients (>85%) still eventually relapse around 3-4 years after diagnosis, and ultimately die of their disease, despite salvage therapies. Relapse can occur even when complete remission is achieved after first-line therapy. Currently, daratumumab (Dara) is approved by the american FDA and EMA in combination with lenalidomide (Len) and dexamethasone (Dex) or bortezomib and Dex for the treatment of MM patients who have received at least one prior therapy. Therefore, the Dara-Len-Dex combination is likely to become the most widely used standard of care regimen for MM at the time of first relapse. However, although approval of the latter combination is meant for until disease progression (PD) ("continuous therapy") (CT), the actual optimal duration of relapse treatment is still unknown. Of note, many experts advocate that a "fixed duration" of therapy should be favored, especially if one can show that CT does not translate into a significant overall survival (OS) benefit. As a matter of fact, given the extremely high cost of such novel agents (>100 KEuros/year/patient), the pharmacoeconomic consequences of a "continuous" versus "fixed" duration therapy are also of utmost importance. Based on this background, the investigator propose to conduct a non-inferiority phase III randomized, multicenter, open label trial for treatment of MM at first relapse, comparing the Dara-Len-Dex combination administered continuously until PD, versus a fixed duration of 24 months. The choice of this duration is justified by the currently available evidence with respect to achievement of a plateau in terms of deep disease response, patients' compliance, and physicians' preference according to different surveys. The primary objective of this study is to estimate the OS rate at 4 years after diagnosis of relapse and initiation of salvage therapy. The primary endpoint is OS at 4 years after randomization. The analysis will be performed on both per-protocol and intent-to-treat sets of patients.
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the combination of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) and enzalutamide in the treatment of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have not received chemotherapy for mCRPC, are abiraterone-naïve, or are intolerant to or progressed on abiraterone acetate. There are two primary study hypotheses. Hypothesis 1: The combination of pembrolizumab plus enzalutamide is superior to placebo plus enzalutamide with respect to Overall Survival (OS). Hypothesis 2: The combination of pembrolizumab plus enzalutamide is superior to placebo plus enzalutamide with respect to Radiographic Progression-free Survival (rPFS) per Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG)-modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1) as assessed by blinded independent central review.
Research Hypothesis Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in France and in western countries, accounting for more than 1.8 million new cases and 1.5 million deaths worldwide in 2012. Recent advances in the management of patients with Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients (NSCLC) include the use of therapies targeting oncogenes but a molecular alteration is currently found in only the half of the non-squamous NSCLC . More recently, immune check point inhibitors (ICI), firstly targeting PD-(L)1, became available and demonstrate an overall survival advantage over standard second-line chemotherapy both in squamous and non-squamous NSCLC. Unfortunately, this global overall survival benefit is driven by approximately 20% of the patient's population while a large majority of patients is in fact progressing in the first weeks of treatment. In the context of personalized medicine, innovative immunotherapy strategies in oncology are based on the principle of immune-contexture and require: - The identification of biomarkers for assessing the specific immune-contexture of each patient (microenvironment, tumors and effector cells) - The development of new treatments targeting their appropriate effector cells in monotherapy or combination treatments. The current PIONEER-Clinical study is aimed at assessing how to overcome resistance to ICIs monotherapies or ICI in combination with platinum-based chemotherapies, with experimental precision immunotherapies combined to Durvalumab in 2nd, 3rd or 4th line, in advanced NSCLC progressors patients after up to 18more than 6 w. of anti PD (L) 1. for ICIs monotherapies and after more than 12w. of anti PD(L)1 in combination with chemotherapies. Some supplementary blood and tissue samples are aimed at identification of personalized patients' biomarkers, correlation of them with the efficacy endpoints, in order to better understand mechanisms of resistance and improve their future treatment.
This is a randomized, double-blind, study that compares pembrolizumab (MK-3475) with placebo given as adjuvant therapy in participants with high-risk locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (LA cSCC) that have undergone surgery with curative intent in combination with radiotherapy. The primary hypothesis is that pembrolizumab is superior to placebo in increasing recurrence free survival (RFS).
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of pemetrexed + platinum chemotherapy + pembrolizumab (MK-3475) with or without lenvatinib (MK-7902/E7080) as first-line intervention in adults with metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. The primary study hypotheses state that: 1) the combination of lenvatinib + platinum doublet chemotherapy + pembrolizumab prolongs Progression-free Survival (PFS) as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RESIST 1.1) compared to matching placebo + platinum doublet chemotherapy + pembrolizumab, and 2) the combination of lenvatinib + platinum doublet chemotherapy + pembrolizumab prolongs Overall Survival (OS) compared to matching placebo + platinum doublet chemotherapy + pembrolizumab.
Patent Foramen Ovale, is an embryonic remnant, formed by apposition of the septum primum and septum secondum composing the interatrial septum. This foramen ovale is permeable during intra-uterine life and allows inter-auricular communication. It tends to close at birth, due to increased pressure from the left atrium. However, it remains permeable in almost 25% of the general population. Several studies have shown that this cardiac "anomaly" associated with the atrial septum aneurysm (ASA), easily diagnosed by ultrasound, is more common in patients with cryptogenic stroke. The diagnosis of patent foramen ovale is performed by a cardiac ultrasound with a "bubble" test: a volume of micro-bubbles obtained by emulsion of saline (9 ml) and air (1 ml) is injected intravenously. The path of these microbubbles is observed by trans-thoracic ultrasound and can detect a shunt right / left. This test can be sensitized by Valsalva maneuver and / or cough. The shunt is quantified by the number of microbubbles flowing through the right / left shunt: positive diagnosis: more than 3 bubbles passing; minimal shunt <10 bubbles, moderate shunt between 10 and 30 bubbles, massive shunt if> 30 bubbles. Patent Foramen Ovale Closure is an interventional cardiac catheterization procedure by venous femoral approach. Several clinical trials show that Patent Foramen Ovale closure prevents stroke recurrence in young people and that this procedure is more effective than antiplatelet therapy. Nevertheless, an increase in the incidence of peri-procedural atrial fibrillation has been observed. For some researchers, this would be explained by irritation of the atrial muscle due to the establishment of the device. To date, only percutaneous closures made in clinical trials have been evaluated. In fact, there are no specific recommendations. The use in clinical practice of this percutaneous treatment therefore requires an evaluation of the indications but also the profile of the patients to optimize these procedures and reduce the complication rate. The closure technique and the choice of the size of the prosthesis are not standardized. The closure is done under trans-esophageal echocardiography (invasive method) or trans-thoracic echocardiography (non-invasive method) depending on the choice of the practitioner. In CLOSE study, this rate is not specified. The procedure rate under general anesthesia is 54%. This category of patients can be assumed to use a trans-esophageal echocardiography. The absence of specific recommendations concerning the technical modalities of this procedure lead us to study the closure of Patent Foramen Ovale standardized under trans-thoracic echocardiography and to evaluate its possible reliefs by avoiding the general anesthesia and the use of trans-esophageal echocardiography. The objective of the study is to bring elements of standardization of the technique. As part of a "real life" study, we will evaluate the success rate of procedure under local anesthesia and under trans-thoracic echocardiography control. This evaluation will be done by trans-thoracic echocardiography at 3 months, the re-endothelisation time of the medical device being between 1 and 3 months.