There are about 36818 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in China. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
RATIONALE: Patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer have limited choice on targeted therapies, and often show only modest responses to available immunotherapies. Adoptive cell therapy with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes has difficulties in preparing enough cells from solid tumors and overcoming the exhaustion and dysfunction of T cells, which limit its clinical use. Tumor-draining lymph node-derived lymphocytes (LNLs) that have abundant tumor-specific T cells, rather than exhausted T cells, are easier to produce. It is not yet known whether LNL treatment is safe and effective in patients with advanced HER2-negative breast cancer. PURPOSE: This open-label phase I/II trial is to study the safety and efficacy of autologous LNL in patients with advanced HER2-negative breast cancer.
In patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma undergoing standard surgical treatment after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy, can PD-1 inhibitor therapy be used instead of adjuvant radiotherapy for both primary and lymph node pathology? To provide further evidence-based medical evidence for the late precision treatment of HNSCC patients after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy. Avoid the side effects caused by excessive radiotherapy, especially avoid the occurrence of second primary cancer, radiation osteonecrosis and other diseases. 1. Main study endpoint: A randomized controlled, non-inferiority, multicentre Phase III trial was conducted to investigate the difference in 5-year overall survival (OS) between experimental group (Group B) and control group (group A) in patients undergoing standard surgical treatment after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy for locally advanced HNSCC, with both primary and lymph node pathology revealed by pCR. At the same time, adverse events and safety were evaluated according to NCI-CTCAE 5.0 criteria and RTOG later radiotherapy damage evaluation criteria. Safety indicators focused on late radiotherapy toxicity and the incidence of grade 3 and 4 adverse reactions in NCI-CTC AE 5.0 and RTOG. The differences in the incidence of grade 3 and 4 adverse events were compared between the experimental group and the control group. 2. Secondary study endpoint: The differences in 2-year disease-free survival (DFS), regional relapse-free survival (RRFS), distant metastasis free survival (DMFS), safety and adverse events were compared. Safety evaluation NCI-CTC AE 5.0 standard was used to evaluate the acute safety index of radiotherapy, and RTOG late-stage damage evaluation standard was used to evaluate the late-stage safety index of radiotherapy. 4) Exploratory goals The influence of prognostic laboratory indicators, clinical risk factors were analyzed. To explore the factors that influence the efficacy of radiotherapy after pCR immunotherapy.
In this study, 200 patients with resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (T3 or T4, N0) were enrolled and preoperatively combined with pembrolizumab (PD-1 inhibitor), carboplatin, and albumin-binding paclitaxel. The subjects were randomly divided 1:1 into four treatments and two treatments. The imaging and pathological changes of tumor and paracancer tissues before and after treatment were observed. Clinical information, such as pathological grade, stage, treatment, prognosis, serology, imaging, etc., was collected to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 4-course pembrolizumab combined with carboplatin and albumin-binding paclitaxel compared with 2-course neoadjuvant therapy for resectable oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. This is a prospective, one-arm, phase II clinical study. Main purpose By calculating pathological complete response (pCR) in the experimental group, we evaluated the efficacy (optimality) of four courses of pembrolizumab combined with carboplatin and albumin-binding paclitaxel compared with two courses of neoadjuvant therapy for resectable oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (T3 or T4, N0). At the same time, this study evaluated the safety of medication, specifically: The severity of adverse events associated with neoadjuvant therapy will be graded according to NCI CTCAE (version 5.0) during this study and during follow-up, and the occurrence of adverse events in the experimental and control groups will be compared. To evaluate the safety of 4-course Pembrolizumab combined with carboplatin and albumin-binding paclitaxel compared with 2-course neoadjuvant therapy for resectable oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (T3 or T4, N0). Secondary Purpose 1. The event-free survival (EFS) of the two groups were compared; 2. The main pathological response rate (MPR) of the two groups were compared; 3. pTR of the two groups was compared; 4. Overall survival (OS) of the two groups was compared; 5. The radiological responses of the two groups were compared; 6. The operation delay rate of the two groups was compared; Exploratory purpose For the response of enrolled patients after treatment, group treatment was conducted according to the guidelines, and stratified factors influencing the prognosis and treatment plan of immunotherapy were explored according to stratification. The stratification factors taken into consideration are: P16 status, smoking history, TNM stage, tumor reduction (MPR condition), presence of risk factors (according to the guidelines, risk factors are presence of episopercular invasion, positive incisal margin, proximal incisal margin, pT3 or pT4, pN2 or pN3 lymph nodes located in the IV and V regions of the neck, Nerve invasion, vascular invasion, etc.). The purpose of this study was to stratified risk factors for evaluating the efficacy of pembrolizumab combined with carboplatin and albumin-paclitaxel in neoadjuvant therapy for resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. At the same time, hematological, pathological and fecal indicators collected in the design of the experiment were collected. Correlation analysis was conducted to statistically analyze the relationship between these indicators and the therapeutic effect of the program.
This is an open-label, single-arm study to investigate the efficacy and safety of AK104 (an Anti-PD1 and Anti-CTLA4 Bispecific Antibody) and neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in patients with pMMR/MSS locally advanced rectal cancer.
This is a Phase II/III, randomized, multicenter, open-label clinical trial designed to evaluate safety and efficacy of RC48-ADC combine with Toripalimab and chemotherapy or RC48-ADC combine with Toripalimab and Herceptin as first-line treatment in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-expression participants with locally advanced or metastatic gastric cancer.
Accurate assessment of lymph node status in superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma is of great significance for preventing undertreatment and overtreatment. However, the accuracy of the commonly used preoperative imaging methods for evaluating lymph node status is not high, and it is urgent to develop a prediction model that can predict the risk of individual lymph node metastasis to assist in clinical decision-making. In this context, investigators intend to retrospectively collect the clinical and pathological data of 300 patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, construct a lymph node metastasis risk prediction model. In addition, investigators are also preparing to prospectively collect tissue samples from 30 patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma to further explore the mechanism of lymph node metastasis.
The purpose of this study is to compare concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) alone with induction chemotherapy (gemcitabine+cisplatin) plus CCRT in patients with low-risk locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma(NPC).
This was a single-arm, multicenter, Phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy of zanubrutinib combined with BR (Bendamustine/Rituximab) regimen in Chinese participants with newly-diagnosed Waldenström's macroglobulinemia who exhibited one or more of the criteria for requiring treatment based on consensus guidelines from the 11th International Workshop on Waldenström's Macroglobulinemia (IWWM). The investigators propose this combination will improve the deep remission compared to single Zanubrutinib or BR regimen and can be a time-limited regimen which will reduce the life-time therapy and benefit the patients.
This is a prospective, open, single-center clinical study of RC48 combined with PD-1 and radiotherapy as bladder-preserving therapy in patients with muscular invasive bladder uroepithelial carcinoma with high HER-2 expression (IHC 2+ or 3+). The study was conducted in accordance with the Good Practice for Clinical Trials of Pharmaceutical Products (GCP). Six patients were enrolled in this study. Each patient received RC48 injection [2.0 mg/kg, Q2W, iv] and Toripalimab injection [3mg/kg, Q2W, iv] for 1~2 cycles, and radiotherapy at the second or third cycle. The total dose of bladder irradiation field was greater than 50Gy (about 30 times), and the safety monitoring of the subjects was conducted within 28 days after receiving the study drug treatment for the first time. Adverse events were graded using the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Standard for the Assessment of Common Terminology for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 5.0 guidelines, and the occurrence of DLT in patients was observed. If the subject does not complete the safety assessment for the tolerance observation period for non-dose tolerance reasons, a new subject will be replaced.
The goal of this randomized control trial is to compare the efficacy and safety of Platelet Rich Plasma VS Platelet Fibrin Plasma in patients with diabetes foot ulcer. The main question it aims to answer are: - Whether the Platelet Fibrin Plasma have noninferior efficacy than Platelet Rich Plasma in treatment of diabetes foot ulcer？ - Whether the Platelet Fibrin Plasma have noninferior safety than Platelet Rich Plasma in treatment of diabetes foot ulcer？ Participants will be assigned with a 1:1 ratio into intervention group and control group. Participants of intervention group will receive Platelet Fibrin Plasma in addition with clinical optimal treatment plan after the wound bed preparation for closure. Participants of intervention group will receive Platelet Rich Plasma in addition with clinical optimal treatment plan after the wound bed preparation for closure.