There are about 36818 clinical studies being (or have been) conducted in China. The country of the clinical trial is determined by the location of where the clinical research is being studied. Most studies are often held in multiple locations & countries.
The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of opevesostat plus hormone replacement therapy (HRT) compared to alternative abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide in participants with Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) previously treated with one next-generation hormonal agent (NHA). The primary study hypotheses are that opevesostat is superior to alternative abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide with respect to radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) per Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG) Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) and overall survival (OS), in androgen receptor ligand binding domain (AR LBD) mutation positive and negative participants.
This is a phase 3, randomized, open-label study of opevesostat compared to alternative abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide in participants with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with respect to overall survival (OS) and to radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) per Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG) Modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) as assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR) in participants with mCRPC previously treated with next-generation hormonal agent (NHA) and taxane-based chemotherapy. It is hypothesized that opevesostat is superior with respect to OS and rPFS per PCWG Modified RECIST 1.1 as assessed by BICR in androgen receptor ligand binding domain (AR LBD) mutation-negative and -positive participants.
The primary objectives of this study are to evaluate the safety and tolerability of opevesostat in the treatment of male Chinese participants with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and to characterize the pharmacokinetic profile of opevesostat. There are no formal hypotheses to be tested in this study.
The goal of this study is to evaluate nemtabrutinib compared with investigator's choice of ibrutinib or acalabrutinib in participants with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL)/small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) who have not received any prior therapy. The primary hypotheses are that (1) nemtabrutinib is non-inferior to ibrutinib or acalabrutinib with respect to objective response rate (ORR) per International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (iwCLL) Criteria 2018 by blinded independent central review (BICR) and (2) nemtabrutinib is superior to ibrutinib or acalabrutinib with respect to progression free survival (PFS) per iwCLL Criteria 2018 by BICR.
Trial Title: Prospective, multicenter, single-arm target value clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a transcatheter aortic valve system in the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis Test device: Transcatheter aortic valve system. Pilot Phase: Clinical Validation of Class III Medical Devices. Study design: prospective, multicenter, single-group target value. Sample size: 120 cases. Intended Use: The Transcatheter Aortic Valve System is indicated for patients with a diagnosis of severe aortic stenosis by the Comprehensive Heart Team. Objective: This clinical trial is a prospective, multicenter, single-arm study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the transcatheter aortic valve system in the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis. Primary endpoint: 12-month postoperative all-cause mortality All-cause deaths include cardiac death and non-cardiac death. Secondary Endpoints: 1. Device success rate 2. Procedural success rate 3. Delivery system performance 4. Retrieval system performance (e.g. using a recycling system) 5. Exchange system performance 6. Valvular function at Immediately postoperative, 7 days/at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 2-5 years follow-up: valve stenosis, regurgitation, valve function (e.g., opening area, pressure gradient), paravalvular leakage 7. Improvement in quality of life at 30 days, 6 months, 12 months postoperatively 8. Improvement in cardiac function at 7 days/at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, 2-5 years postoperatively Experimental design: This trial is a prospective, multicenter, single-group clinical study with a target value to evaluate the Transcatheter Aortic Valve system Safety and efficacy in the treatment of patients with severe aortic stenosis with 12 months of All-cause mortality after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. The mortality rate was the primary study endpoint, and after statistical assumptions and sample size calculations, 120 patients were planned to be enrolled. Patients were clinically followed immediately after valve implantation, 7 days postoperatively/at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, 12 months, and 2-5 years postoperatively. In this trial, all relevant clinical data were collected, sorted out and statistically analyzed by an independent data management and statistics center and a clinical monitoring institution. All enrolled subjects underwent outpatient follow-up at 30 days, 6 months, and 12 months after surgery, and performed relevant imaging examinations (ultrasound, etc.) and laboratory tests and safety evaluations, and continuous follow-up and cardiac ultrasound examinations were performed annually at 2-5 years to observe the occurrence of adverse events to evaluate the long-term safety of the transcatheter aortic valve system. The safety and efficacy of the transcatheter aortic valve system were evaluated with the subject's 12-month postoperative all-cause mortality as the primary endpoint, and the immediate postoperative device success rate, procedural success, retrieval system performance, valve function, cardiac function improvement, quality of life improvement, all-cause mortality in different follow-up periods, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events, myocardial infarction, stroke, hemorrhage, acute kidney injury, permanent pacemaker implantation, serious vascular complications, and other TAVR-related complications were taken as the secondary endpoints to assist in evaluating the safety and efficacy of the test product, and to provide a basis for the final official listing and domestic marketing.
To evaluate the tolerability and safety of SENL101 in patients with relapsed or refractory T-LBL/ALL.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Zanubrutinib given in combination with bendamustine and rituximab in (elderly or TP53 alterations or chemotherapy intolerance) patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma.
This is a multi-center, single arm, open-label, phase I study to determine the safety and effectiveness of EBV-TCR-T cell immunotherapy in treating EBV-associated hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (EBV-HLH) or EBV infection
CHina Registry for the chAracteristics and Management strategieS of patiEnts With Pulmonary Hypertension Using Targeted Therapy (CHASE Study)
The goal of this observational study is to learn about the the pattern of metastasis of the No.253 lymph node in colorectal cancer. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. What are the risk factors for metastasis to the No.253 lymph node? 2.What is the prognosis for patients with metastasis to the No.253 lymph node? Patients with descending colon cancer, sigmoid colon cancer, and rectal cancer who undergo curative surgery with dissection of the No.253 lymph node are included in this study