Clinical Trials Logo

Filter by:
NCT ID: NCT04138485 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Diffuse Cutaneous Systemic Sclerosis

Efficacy and Safety of IgPro10 in Adults With Systemic Sclerosis (SSc)

Start date: December 20, 2019
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

This randomized, multicenter, double-blind (DB), placebo controlled, phase 2 study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of IgPro10. The DB Treatment Period will be followed by a 24-week Open-label (OL) Treatment Period. Eligible subjects will be randomized at Baseline in a 2:1 ratio of treatment IgPro10 or placebo in the DB Treatment Period. All subjects who enter OL Treatment Period will receive IgPro10.

NCT ID: NCT04039477 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Immune Thrombocytopenia

A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of KZR-616 in Patients With AIHA and ITP

MARINA
Start date: July 2020
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

This is a Phase 2 randomized, dose-blind, multicenter study designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, efficacy, Pharmacokinetics (PK), and Pharmacodynamics (PD) of treatment with KZR-616 in patients with active Autoimmune Hemolytic Anemia or Immune Thrombocytopenia.

NCT ID: NCT04001998 Withdrawn - Fibrosis Clinical Trials

Healthy Volunteer Study Comparing Tablet and Capsule Formulations

Start date: February 2021
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

Single center, randomized, open label, two-part crossover study designed to evaluate the PK, food effect, dose proportionality, safety, and tolerability of BLD-2660 in healthy volunteers.

NCT ID: NCT03785184 Withdrawn - Multiple Myeloma Clinical Trials

A Study of Venetoclax Plus Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed t(11;14)-Positive Multiple Myeloma in Subjects Who Are Ineligible for High-Dose Therapy

Start date: April 29, 2019
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

This study will evaluate the safety and preliminary efficacy of venetoclax when combined with lenalidomide and dexamethasone for participants with newly diagnosed, active t(11;14) positive multiple myeloma (MM). This study will consist of 2 parts: Part 1 Dose Escalation and Part 2 Dose Expansion.

NCT ID: NCT03780465 Withdrawn - Healthy Volunteers Clinical Trials

A Study of Safety and Tolerability of NOX66 in Healthy Volunteers

Start date: March 1, 2019
Phase: Phase 1
Study type: Interventional

A Phase 1, double- blinded, randomised, placebo-controlled study to assess safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of 2 formulations of NOX66 in healthy subjects when administered over 4 cohorts as single NOX66 dose of 400 mg and 600 mg in comparison to single oral dose of 400 mg idronoxil.

NCT ID: NCT03754140 Withdrawn - Melanoma Clinical Trials

Intralesional Sclerosant for in Transit and Cutaneous Melanoma Metastases

INTRANS
Start date: May 20, 2020
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

There is currently an urgent need for low cost and well tolerated intralesional agents for the management of in transit and cutaneous melanoma metastases that are unsuitable for, or resistant to, other therapies. This pilot study will determine whether intralesional injections of the sclerosant polidocanol into intransit and cutaneous melanoma lesions shows promise for efficacy, safety and ease of use that will enable this inexpensive and widely available agent to undergo further evaluation.

NCT ID: NCT03704077 Withdrawn - Gastric Cancer Clinical Trials

An Investigational Immuno-therapy Study of Relatlimab Plus Nivolumab Compared to Various Standard-of-Care Therapies in Previously Treated Participants With Recurrent, Advanced or Metastatic Gastric Cancer or Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

Start date: October 31, 2019
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of relatlimab plus nivolumab, alone or in combination with various standard-of-care treatments in participants with gastric cancer (GC) or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma that has come back or spread to other places in the body after prior therapy.

NCT ID: NCT03632642 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Staphylococcus Aureus

Penicillin Against Flucloxacillin Treatment Evaluation

PANFLUTE
Start date: July 1, 2019
Phase: Phase 4
Study type: Interventional

There is theroretical superiority with benzylpenicillin over orther anti-staphylococcal penicillins (ASP) for treatment of penicillin susceptible S. aureus (PSSA) infections due to a lower MIC distribution when compared with ASPs active against PSSA, combined with the ability to obtain higher levels of free non-protein-bound plasma drug concentrations. Although the data to support this theoretical advantage is limited, many clinicians in Australia (and worldwide) use benzylpenicillin for therapy in this situation despite many international guidelines cautioning against this. This uncertainty is significant given that 1) S. aureus bacteraemia (SAB) is associated with a high mortality and significant morbidity, 2) S. aureus is one of the most common organisms isolated from blood cultures, 3) SAB is the most common reason for consultation with an Infectious Disease specialist (which itself has been shown to improve outcomes) and 4) a significant proportion (up to 20%) of SAB isolates in Australia will be reported as susceptible to penicillin, a proportion which appears to be increasing over the past 10 years in Australia and internationally. Given the frequency of PSSA and the associated morbidity and mortality related to SABs in general, a definitive study to determine the optimal therapy for PSSA is required. In a recent survey of Infectious Diseases Physicians and Clinical Microbiologists in Australasia, 87% of respondents were willing to randomise patients to either benzylpenicillin or flucloxacillin for a clinical trial, whist 71% responded that they would switch therapy from flucloxacillin to benzylpenicillin for treatment of PSSA BSIs in clinical practice (unpublished data). Therefore, the investigators see the opportunity to determine the feasibility of a definitive study comparing benzylpenicillin against flucloxacillin (or other ASP) for treatment of PSSA bloodstream infections.

NCT ID: NCT03591926 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis

A Study Evaluating the Safety, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Efficacy of SM04646 Inhalation Solution in Subjects With Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF)

Start date: January 1900
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

SM04646-IPF-03 is a Phase 2a, multi-center, open-label study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a single inhaled, nebulized dose of SM04646 solution over a 12-week treatment regimen in subjects with mild to moderate IPF. A total of approximately 24 subjects will be enrolled in the study (approximately 12 subjects into the "non-bronchoalveolar lavage [BAL]" arm and approximately 12 subjects into the "BAL" arm). Subjects that currently do not require, have failed to tolerate, or have opted not to have treatment with pirfenidone or nintedanib will have the option of participation in the "BAL" arm or participation in the "non-BAL" arm. Subjects currently receiving treatment with pirfenidone or nintedanib must be on stable treatment for a minimum of 12 weeks prior to the Screening Visit. Subjects currently on treatment with pirfenidone or nintedanib may participate in the "non-BAL" arm only. Eligible subjects will participate in a treatment period of 12 weeks and a follow-up period of 12 weeks. The treatment dosing pattern will follow a 2 weeks on, 2 weeks off regimen, wherein subjects will dose 5 consecutive days of each 7 day "on" week.

NCT ID: NCT03508453 Withdrawn - Clinical trials for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

IC14 for Treatment of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Start date: August 15, 2019
Phase: Phase 2
Study type: Interventional

Fifty patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis that is progressing rapidly will be randomized to receive either the monoclonal antibody IC14 or placebo to be given intravenously over two hours twice weekly for 12 weeks. Blood and urine tests will be done to measure biomarkers in order to evaluate clinical response and to monitor for safety. Other evaluations include patient questionnaires about function, quality of life and mental function; pulmonary function test; and sniff nasal pressure.