Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

NCT number NCT01709864
Other study ID # CNVA237A2317
Secondary ID
Status Completed
Phase Phase 3
First received October 16, 2012
Last updated February 12, 2015
Start date November 2012
Est. completion date October 2013

Study information

Verified date February 2015
Source Novartis
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority United States: Food and Drug Administration
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

The study serves to determine whether the treatment of patients with stable, symptomatic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with the investigational drug NVA237 is efficient and safe. The efficacy and safety of the drug will be tested against a placebo treatment.

The primary criterion to assess efficacy will be the difference between the serial lung function measurements of patients who have been treated for 12 weeks with NVA237 versus those that have received placebo treatment for 12 weeks. A serial lung function measurement (FEV1 testing) will be conducted and the "area under the curve" will be the measure for the ability to breathe.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Completed
Enrollment 440
Est. completion date October 2013
Est. primary completion date October 2013
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Both
Age group 40 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion criteria:

1. Patients with stable, symptomatic Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) with airflow obstruction of level 2 and 3 according to the current Global initiative for chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) strategy (2011).

2. Patients with Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) = 30% and <80 % of the predicted normal, and FEV1/ Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) < 0.70 when measured 45 min after the inhalation of 84 µg ipratropium bromide.

3. Current or ex-smokers with at least 10 cigarette pack years smoking history.

Exclusion criteria:

1. Patients with a history of long QT syndrome, with a prolonged QTc measured during screening, or patients who have a clinically significant ECG abnormality at screening.

2. History of malignancy of any organ system (other than localized basal cell carcinoma of the skin), treated or untreated, within the past 5 years, regardless of whether there is evidence of local recurrence or metastases.

3. Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women. Women of childbearing potential unless using an effective method of contraception.

4. Patients who in the judgment of the investigator, would be at potential risk if enrolled into the study.

5. Patients who have a clinically significant concomitant disease at screening, including but not limited to clinically significant laboratory abnormalities, clinically significant renal, cardiovascular, neurological, endocrine, immunological, psychiatric, gastrointestinal, hepatic, or hematological abnormalities, or with uncontrolled diabetes, which could interfere with the assessment of the efficacy and safety of the study treatment.

6. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) of more than 40 kg/m2.

7. Patients contraindicated for treatment with, or having a history of reactions/ hypersensitivity to anticholinergic agents, long and short acting beta-2 agonists, or sympathomimetic amines.

8. Patients with any history of asthma, with onset of symptoms prior to age 40 years, or patients with a high blood eosinophil count during screening.

Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Design

Allocation: Randomized, Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study, Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment, Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator), Primary Purpose: Treatment


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


Intervention

Drug:
NVA237
NVA237 (glycopyrronium bromide) as a powder for inhalation in single-dose capsules.
Placebo
Placebo powder for inhalation in single-dose capsules (matching those for NVA237).

Locations

Country Name City State
United States Novartis Investigative Site *See Various Dept.'s* Arizona
United States Novartis Investigative Site Amarillo Texas
United States Novartis Investigative Site Arlington Texas
United States Novartis Investigative Site Arlington Texas
United States Novartis Investigative Site Beaumont Texas
United States Novartis Investigative Site Brandon Florida
United States Novartis Investigative Site Charleston South Carolina
United States Novartis Investigative Site Charleston South Carolina
United States Novartis Investigative Site Charlotte North Carolina
United States Novartis Investigative Site Clearwater Florida
United States Novartis Investigative Site Columbia South Carolina
United States Novartis Investigative Site Dallas Texas
United States Novartis Investigative Site Defuniak Springs Florida
United States Novartis Investigative Site Easley South Carolina
United States Novartis Investigative Site Edgewater Florida
United States Novartis Investigative Site Fort Lauderdale Florida
United States Novartis Investigative Site Fountain Valley California
United States Novartis Investigative Site Fullerton California
United States Novartis Investigative Site Gaffney South Carolina
United States Novartis Investigative Site Greenville South Carolina
United States Novartis Investigative Site Hialeah Florida
United States Novartis Investigative Site Homewood Alabama
United States Novartis Investigative Site Huntsville Texas
United States Novartis Investigative Site Jasper Alabama
United States Novartis Investigative Site Las Vegas Nevada
United States Novartis Investigative Site Las Vegas Nevada
United States Novartis Investigative Site Los Angeles California
United States Novartis Investigative Site Los Angeles California
United States Novartis Investigative Site Miami Florida
United States Novartis Investigative Site Miami Florida
United States Novartis Investigative Site Miami Florida
United States Novartis Investigative Site Miami Florida
United States Novartis Investigative Site Ninety Six South Carolina
United States Novartis Investigative Site Pensacola Florida
United States Novartis Investigative Site Pompano Beach Florida
United States Novartis Investigative Site Port Orange Florida
United States Novartis Investigative Site Raleigh North Carolina
United States Novartis Investigative Site Riverside California
United States Novartis Investigative Site Rock Hll South Carolina
United States Novartis Investigative Site San Diego California
United States Novartis Investigative Site San Diego California
United States Novartis Investigative Site Sarasota Florida
United States Novartis Investigative Site Seneca South Carolina
United States Novartis Investigative Site Shelby North Carolina
United States Novartis Investigative Site Simpsonville South Carolina
United States Novartis Investigative Site South Miami Florida
United States Novartis Investigative Site Spartanburg South Carolina
United States Novartis Investigative Site Summerfield Florida
United States Novartis Investigative Site Tamarac Florida
United States Novartis Investigative Site Tampa Florida
United States Novartis Investigative Site Tucson Arizona
United States Novartis Investigative Site Union South Carolina
United States Novartis Investigative Site Waco Texas
United States Novartis Investigative Site Winter Park Florida

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Primary Change From Baseline of Standardized Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) Post Dosing The standardized Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) post dosing (FEV1 AUC) at week 12 of treatment. Serial lung function measurements are taken at various time points following dosing at week 12 to calculate the AUC. 12 weeks No
Secondary Change From Baseline in Trough FEV1 and Pre-dose Trough FEV1 by Visit Trough Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) is the mean of FEV1 at 23h 15min and 23h 45min after the morning dose of the previous day. Pre-dose trough FEV1 is the mean of FEV1 at -45min and -15min before morning dose Day 2, 86 (trough) Day 15, 29, 57, 85 (pre-dose trough) No
Secondary Change From Baseline in FEV1 AUC (0-12H) at Day 1 and FEV1 AUC (0-4h), AUC (4-8h), AUC (8-12h) at Day 1 and Week 12 (Day 85) The standardized Area Under the Curve (AUC) for Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) is assessed for different time spans within the overall serial measurement post dosing (FEV1 AUCs Time Spans), at day 1 and at week 12 of treatment. Serial lung function measurements are taken at various time points post dosing on day 1 and at week 12 to calculate the AUC for these different time spans. Day 1 and Week 12 (Day 85) No
Secondary Change From Baseline in the Health Status Assessed by St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire The health status, as reported by the patients, is assessed using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). The SGRQ is a 50 item scale assessing symptoms, patient activities and impact of the disease. Scores range from 0 to 100 units, with higher scores indicating more limitations. The assessment is based on total score as well as the percentage of patients with clinically significant improvement at week 12 versus day 1. A clinically meaningful improvement (MCID) in SGRQ is defined as a decrease of 4 or more units of the SGRQ scale in the total score, as compared to baseline (change from baseline). Week 12 No
Secondary Percentage of Participants With a Clinically Important Improvement of >=4units in the SGRQ Total Score at Week 12 The health status, as reported by the patients, is assessed using the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). The assessment is based on total score as well as the percentage of patients with clinically significant improvement at week 12 versus day 1. A clinically significant improvement in SGRQ is defined as less than or equal to -4 change from baseline. Week 12 No
Secondary Breathlessness Assessed by Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) Focal Score at Week 12 Breathlessness at week 12 is measured using the Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI). On day 1, breathlessness is assessed by the Baseline Dyspnea Index (BDI). Patients are considered to have clinically significant improvement with the TDI score change versus BDI being equal to or greater than 1. TDI focal score is based on three domains: functional impairment, magnitude of task and magnitude of effort. Each domain is scored from -3 (major deterioration) to 3 (major improvement) to give an overall TDI focal score of -9 to 9. Higher numbers indicate a better score. Week 12 No
Secondary Change From Baseline of Daily Symptom Scores Patients reported symptoms using an electronic diary.The diary has 9 symptom questions each am and each pm. Each question can be answered w/1 of 4 pre-defined answers, with a unit value of 0-3, 0 is least & 3 is most severe symptom.Symptom scores are calculated as the mean of combined daily symptom scores(combined from am & pm)for each patient over 12 weeks. The baseline is calculated from the run-in epoch prior to randomization.The change from baseline is in LS mean daily symptom scores over the 12 weeks. If the mean score over the 12 weeks is lower than the baseline, result is (-).A neg. result indicates an improvement in COPD symptom severity. Patients may have met the min. response requirements for the night scores(am questions),but not for the day scores(pm questions)or vice versa, the # of patients analyzed can vary between both day & night scores. Therefore, the # of patients analyzed for the combined daily symptom score can vary from the #s for individual day & night scores. 12 weeks No
Secondary Change From Baseline of Morning and Nighttime Symptom Scores at Week 12 Patients reported symptoms using an electronic diary.The diary has 9 symptom questions each am & each pm.Each question can be answered w/1 of 4 pre-defined answers,with a unit value of 0-3, 0 is least & 3 is most severe symptom.Symptom scores are calculated as the mean of the symptom scores(either the score assessed in am for the previous 12 hrs-referred to as nighttime scores,or the score assessed in pm for the previous 12 hrs-referred to as the daytime symptom score) for each patient over 12 weeks.The baseline is calculated from the run-in epoch prior to randomization.The change from baseline is in LS mean daily symptom scores over the 12 weeks. If the mean score over the 12 weeks is lower than the baseline, result is (-).A neg. result indicates an improvement in COPD symptom severity. the # of patients analyzed can vary between both day & night scores. Therefore, the # of patients analyzed for the combined daily symptom score can vary from the #s for individual day & night scores. 12 weeks No
Secondary Percentage of Nights With "no Nighttime Awakenings" Patients are reporting symptoms by using an electronic diary. A night with "no nighttime awakening" is defined from diary data as any night where the patient did not wake up due to symptoms. Percentage of no nighttime awakenings from Baseline up to 12 weeks. from Baseline up to 12 weeks No
Secondary Percentage of Days With "no Daytime Symptoms" Patients are reporting symptoms by using an electronic diary. A day with "no daytime symptoms" is defined from diary data as any day where the patient has recorded in the evening no cough, no wheeze, no production of sputum, and no feeling of breathlessness (other than when running) during the past approximately 12 hours. The percentage of days is calculated by the number of days with no daytime symptoms/total number of days with evaluable data X 100. from Baseline up to 12 weeks No
Secondary Percentage of "Days Able to Perform Usual Daily Activities" Patients are reporting symptoms by using an electronic diary. A "day able to perform usual daily activities" is defined from diary data as any day where the patient was not prevented from performing their usual daily activities due to respiratory symptoms. from Baseline up to 12 weeks No
Secondary The Average Number of Puffs of Rescue Medication Per Day Patients report the number of puffs of rescue medication (salbutamol / albuterol) using an electronic diary. The use of rescue medication is analyzed as the mean daily number of puffs used per patient over the 12 weeks treatment period. baseline and 12 weeks No
Secondary Percentage of Days Without Rescue Medication Use Patients report the number of puffs of rescue medication (salbutamol / albuterol) using an electronic diary. The use of rescue medication is analyzed as the percentage of days without usage of rescue medication over the 12 weeks treatment period. The baseline is calculated from the run-in epoch prior to randomization. 12 weeks No
Secondary Change From Baseline of Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at All Individual Timepoints at Day 1 and at Week 12 (Day 85) The Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) assessments for all individual time points of the serial measurements on day 1 and at week 12 are analyzed. Baseline, Day 1 and Week 12 (Day 85) No
Secondary Change From Baseline of Forced Expiratory Volume in One Second (FEV1) at All Individual Timepoints at Day 1 and at Week 12 (Day 85) The Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) assessments for all individual time points of the serial measurements on day 1 and at week 12 are analyzed. Baseline, Day 1 and Week 12 (Day 85) No
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Completed NCT05102305 - A Multi-center,Prospective, OS to Evaluate the Effectiveness of 'NAC' Nebulizer Therapy in COPD (NEWEST)
Completed NCT01867762 - An Effectiveness and Safety Study of Inhaled JNJ 49095397 (RV568) in Patients With Moderate to Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05562037 - Stepped Care vs Center-based Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation for Older Frail Adults Living in Rural MA N/A
Terminated NCT04921332 - Bright Light Therapy for Depression Symptoms in Adults With Cystic Fibrosis (CF) and COPD N/A
Completed NCT03089515 - Small Airway Chronic Obstructive Disease Syndrome Following Exposure to WTC Dust N/A
Completed NCT02787863 - Clinical and Immunological Efficiency of Bacterial Vaccines at Adult Patients With Bronchopulmonary Pathology Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05552833 - Pulmonary Adaptive Responses to HIIT in COPD N/A
Recruiting NCT05835492 - A Pragmatic Real-world Multicentre Observational Research Study to Explore the Clinical and Health Economic Impact of myCOPD
Recruiting NCT05631132 - May Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation (NIV) and/or Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Increase the Bronchoalveolar Lavage (BAL) Salvage in Patients With Pulmonary Diseases? N/A
Completed NCT03244137 - Effects of Pulmonary Rehabilitation on Cognitive Function in Patients With Severe to Very Severe Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Not yet recruiting NCT03282526 - Volume Parameters vs Flow Parameters in Assessment of Reversibility in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease N/A
Completed NCT02546700 - A Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of Lebrikizumab in Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Phase 2
Withdrawn NCT04446637 - Acute Bronchodilator Effects of Ipratropium/Levosalbutamol 20/50 mcg Fixed Dose Combination vs Salbutamol 100 mcg Inhaler Plus Ipratropium 20 mcg Inhalation Aerosol Free Combination in Patients With Stable COPD Phase 3
Completed NCT04535986 - A Phase 3 Clinical Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ensifentrine in Patients With COPD Phase 3
Recruiting NCT05865184 - Evaluation of Home-based Sensor System to Detect Health Decompensation in Elderly Patients With History of CHF or COPD
Completed NCT03256695 - Evaluate the Relationship Between Use of Albuterol Multidose Dry Powder Inhaler With an eModule (eMDPI) and Exacerbations in Participants With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Phase 3
Completed NCT03295474 - Telemonitoring in Pulmonary Rehabilitation: Feasibility and Acceptability of a Remote Pulse Oxymetry System.
Withdrawn NCT04042168 - Implications of Appropriate Use of Inhalers in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Phase 4
Completed NCT03414541 - Safety And Efficacy Study Of Orally Administered DS102 In Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Phase 2
Completed NCT02552160 - DETECT-Register DocumEnTation and Evaluation of a COPD Combination Therapy