View clinical trials related to Constriction, Pathologic.
Filter by:Cerebrovascular accidents (CVA) are the second leading cause of death in France, and the most frequent cause of acquired physical and mental disability. Up to 90% of strokes are ischemic, among which about 15% are due to the presence of stenosis of the carotid sinus, at the base of the extracranial internal carotid artery. For many years, only the degree of stenosis was used to assess the risk of stroke, based on the results of original studies from the 1990s. However, the significant improvement in medical treatments since then has significantly reduced the risk of stroke, and the benefits of carotid intervention are becoming increasingly debatable. Since the publication of the latest recommendations, the degree of stenosis alone is no longer sufficient to propose an intervention, since most of them will never lead to a neurological event. In addition to stenosis greater than 60%, for the first time, other criteria must be sought to decide on treatment. For example, so-called carotid plaque "vulnerability" criteria, defining patients "at high risk of stroke," should be sought.
Consecutive patients with severe mitral stenosis and clot in left atrial appendage (LAA) on transesophageal echocardiography fulfilling the inclusion criteria will be recruited for this study. An ACUSON 128-XP echocardiographic system equipped with omniplane and biplane transesophageal probes will be used for this study. TEE followed by CT Angiography will be performed according to the standard procedure after obtaining informed consent.
A prospective, non-randomized, single-arm, single-center, first-in-human study designed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the DurAVR™ THV System in the treatment of subjects with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis.
Aortic stenosis is narrowing of the aortic valve, and is the commonest type of valve disease requiring surgery. Current guidelines recommend waiting till patients develop symptoms (chest pain, breathlessness and dizzy spells/fainting) before possible open heart surgery to replace the valve is offered. However, studies using detailed 'MRI' scanning of the heart have shown that up to half of the patients already have 'scarring' in the heart by the time symptoms develop. Furthermore, scarring is not fully reversed even after surgery and is associated with worse outcome. This suggests that some patients are being offered treatment too late. Two randomised trials in the UK (EASY AS and EVOLVED) are currently investigating if valve replacement before symptoms will result in better survival. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of early valve replacement versus waiting for symptoms, on the amount of scarring in the heart. The investigators want to know if early treatment leads to less overall scarring at the end, and leads to better quality of life and recovery after surgery. The investigators will invite participants of the EASY AS and EVOLVED trials to have 1-2 MRI heart scans: at recruitment and 3 years after being randomly allocated to early aortic valve replacement vs 'watchful waiting'. The investigators will also assess the impact of the two treatment approaches on quality of life, disability-free survival (using questionnaires) and recovery after surgery. The results from this project will increase understanding of the results of the main trials, and lead to improved selection of patients with aortic stenosis who are likely to benefit from early surgery.
The objective of this clinical trial is to collect data on procedural safety and device performance of the Portico and Navitor devices and FlexNav delivery system to treat patients with severe aortic stenosis in the Indian population.
Aortic stenosis (AS) is the most common valvular heart disease in the developed world. Once symptomatic, untreated patients have a poor prognosis with five-year survival rate of 25%. Once at an advanced stage, AS will lead to the development of left ventricle hypertrophy, and eventually heart failure and death. At-present, there is no effective medical therapy for aortic stenosis. Current management of patients with AS consists of 'watchful waiting'. Valve replacement is needed when these patients (often acutely) become symptomatic. Recent studies have shown that inflammatory processes with similarities to atherosclerosis play an important role in AS. Therefore, we hypothesize that treatment with anti-inflammatory therapy, in the form of colchicine, could reduce the progression of AS. If positive, this trial will be the first to provide a potential therapeutic option for millions of people world-wide with AS.
Subglottic stenosis (obstructing scar in the larynx and trachea) occurs in patients spontaneously (idiopathic), with autoimmune disease, and after long-term breathing tube placement and can result in communication disability and high mortality rates due to the obstructed airway. The proposed Adjuvant EveRolimus Outcomes (AERO) trial is proof-of-concept study using the immunosuppressant drug, everolimus, to reduce the number of surgeries for patients with idiopathic Subglottic Stenosis (iSGS). Success with the AERO trial will allow for everolimus to be used in subsequent larger trials of participants with laryngotracheal stenosis and could lead to everolimus being the first FDA approved medical treatment for iSGS.
Therefore, a high number of procedures is necessary to achieve EUS competency, but interobserver agreement still varies widely. Artificial intelligence (AI) aided recognition of anatomical structures may improve the training process and inter-observer agreement. Robles-Medranda et al. developed an AI model that recognizes normal anatomical structures during linear and radial EUS evaluations. We pursue to design an external validation of our developed AI model, considering an endoscopist expert as the gold standard.
Conventional open surgery has been shown to be an effective procedure for LCS decompression. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) through tubular retractors is a recently introduced alternative procedure for decompression of LCS. The current study aims at evaluating the efficacy of minimally invasive surgery as a decompressive procedure in comparison to conventional open surgery for the treatment of patients with LCS.
Multidisciplinary team-approach in order to offer personalized treatments represents the emerging mainstream in cardiovascular medicine. "Hybrid operative rooms" allow to offer selected heart-disease patients truly "tailored" operations. This study wants to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Hybrid Procedures in cardiac patients in three subgroups of patients: - Hybrid coronary revascularization strategy (coronary by-pass + PCI); - Hybrid valve and coronary disease correction (combination of surgical valve replacement and PCI); - Hybrid coronary and carotid artery disease treatment (combination of coronary by-pass and carotid stenting). The investigators hypothesize that morbidity might be reduced by 50% in hybrid procedures group as compared with predicted Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) score.