Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT06195046 |
Other study ID # |
Pro00115552 |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
February 1, 2024 |
Est. completion date |
April 25, 2027 |
Study information
Verified date |
January 2024 |
Source |
Medical University of South Carolina |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This study will involve LVAD patients who have already received a clinically-indicated BAT
(BAROSTIM) device. After recovery from LVAD implant, we will investigate the effects of BAT
in a double-blind cross-over study design.
Description:
Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) provide a meaningful therapeutic option for patients
with end-stage systolic heart failure who cannot receive cardiac transplantation. For these
patients, LVADs have been shown to improve mortality, functional capacity, and quality of
life [1-3]. With ever-improving technological and procedural advances, the number of LVAD
implantations for patients with end-stage cardiomyopathy as bridge to transplant, recovery,
or even as destination therapy continues to rise [4]. Despite the short term clinical
benefits of LVAD support, studies show that deleterious neurohormonal activation does not
abate after LVAD implantation and that left ventricular scarring (or fibrosis) does not
regress and may worsen. Similarly, the prevalence of myocardial recovery with LVAD support
has been dismally low with <1% of patients recovering to the point where their LVAD can be
safely explanted. Given that the majority of patients undergoing LVAD are now doing so with a
destination therapy designation, and that the median estimated survival time on LVAD support
ranges from 4-6 years, the importance of therapies to maximize chances for myocardial
recovery while LVAD supported is evident.
The pathophysiologic reasons underlying the lack of abrogation of sympathetic and
neurohormonal signaling with LVAD support, even in the face of adequate hemodynamic support,
may center around the non-pulsatile nature of the device. Markham and Levine described
sympathetic nerve activity in both pulsatile and nonpuslatile LVAD patients in 2013,
demonstrating that patients with nonpulsatile devices had markedly elevated muscle
sympathetic nerve activity, though pulsatile LVAD patients and normal controls had similar
sympathetic activity. In a sequence of experiments, the authors demonstrated that this was at
least partly due to baroreceptor unloading in the nonpulsatile patients. Further studies have
demonstrated that plasma norepinephrine levels remain elevated after VAD implant, as do
neurohormones in the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone axis. Sympathetic neurohormone levels have
been shown to correlate with clinical response to LVAD therapy (defined by significant
improvement in quality of life determined by the KCCQ), with reduced B-adrenergic receptor
kinase-1 and DHPG levels differentiating those with better clinical response. Further,
pathologic studies pre- and post-LVAD have demonstrated an acceleration of deleterious
myocardial fibrosis during LVAD support, potentially driven by sympathetic and/or RAAS
signaling pathways.
As demonstrated in preclinical studies and the clinical BeAT-HF trial, autonomic modulation
with baroreflex activation therapy (BAT) with the BAROSTIM NEO system reduced sympathetic
signaling, leading to increased NT-proBNP, 6-minute hall walk distance (6MHW), and improved
quality of life in patients with chronic systolic heart failure.
However, the role of BAT in the unique physiologic LVAD-supported state has not be
characterized. Given the concerns that LVAD support by augment sympathetic and thereby RAAS
signaling, and that BAT may abrogate those deleterious pathways, we propose to study the
clinical and neurohormonal effects of BAT in LVAD supported patients.