Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Not yet recruiting
Administrative data
NCT number |
NCT05919836 |
Other study ID # |
lap hernia in pediatrics |
Secondary ID |
|
Status |
Not yet recruiting |
Phase |
N/A
|
First received |
|
Last updated |
|
Start date |
September 2023 |
Est. completion date |
June 2025 |
Study information
Verified date |
June 2023 |
Source |
Assiut University |
Contact |
n/a |
Is FDA regulated |
No |
Health authority |
|
Study type |
Interventional
|
Clinical Trial Summary
Comparison between multiple approaches of laparoscopic hernia ( percutaneous assisted
laparoscopic hernia, purse string closure of hernial sac, total dissection of hernial sac).
Description:
In pediatric age, indirect inguinal hernia represents more than 95% of the hernial disease.
It is a congenital type, in contrast with adulthood in which acquired forms are more
frequently found.
Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most frequently performed surgical procedure in infants
and young children. Laparoscopic hernia repair in infancy and childhood is still debatable.
There are many techniques available for laparoscopic hernia repair in pediatrics.
Laparoscopic hernial repair is increasingly adopted even for neonates and has achieved a high
success rate with low recurrence rate with long-term follow-up. The main advantages of
laparoscopy are no incision of the fascia, exploration of the other side in case of bilateral
hernia, and visualization and safeguarding of the vas deferens and the spermatic vessels.
Moreover, it is advantageous over open technique in case of recurrent hernia. Different
modalities of techniques have been used for repair such as needlescopic disconnection of
hernia sac, flip flap technique, muscular arch repair, and ring closure.