THORACIC MANIPULATION and COMPLEX REGIONAL PAIN SYNDROME

Complex Regional Pain Syndromes Clinical Trial

Official title:

INFLUENCE of THORACIC MANIPULATION on TYPE 1 COMPLEX REGIONAL PAIN SYNDROME Post-UPPER LIMB TRAUMA

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Completed

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT04769128
• Other study ID #: Thoracic manipulation on CRPS1
• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: July 29, 2018
• Est. completion date: June 20, 2020

Study information

• Verified date: February 2021
• Source: South Valley University
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

To compare the effect of combined thoracic manipulation (TM) and traditional physical therapy treatment (TPT) versus TPT treatment alone on pain severity at rest and functional disability in patients with type 1 complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS I) post-upper limb trauma.

Description:

Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a chronic state of pain that is frequently triggered by an injury and is characterized by a variable combination of sensory, motor, vasomotor, and sudomotor symptoms, in the affected limb..the frequency of CRPS after injury was 3.8-7.0 % within four months of fracture. The highest prevalence occurs in the age group of 40 to 60 years. The pathophysiology of CRPS is still controversial, but a recent study has shown that up to 70% of patients with CRPS have anti-autonomic immunoglobulin G (IgG) autoantibodies associated with autonomic disorders in their serum CRPS, increasing the probability of these antiautonomic antibodies contributing to the pathophysiology of CRPS. Under normal conditions, sympathetic behavior does not affect the discharge of nociceptors; but nociceptors tend to be under the control of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) in the case of CRPS. This is referred to as pain maintained sympathetically. Conservative treatments for CRPS I have traditionally focused on pain reduction through pharmacology, desensitization therapy, transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TENS), and thermal modalities and function restoration through active, passive, and strengthening exercises of the arm. Patients with arm CRPSI also show postural deviations related to the arm's defensive role. During all upright tasks, this posture reduces trunk motion and can have effects such as reduced thoracic intervertebral mobility. Near to the thoracic costovertebral and zygapophyseal joints are the sympathetic chain ganglia that innervate the upper limb. It may be probable that the sympathetic chain ganglia affected by thoracic dysfunction arising from joint or soft tissue restriction and may be related to the distal symptoms in CRPS. Thus, thoracic spine manipulation can be an aid to the overall treatment of the symptoms in patients with CRPS I. There is no study involving a control group in the available studies. As with all case studies, while the findings might be interesting for future research. our study is the first study to investigate the impact of thoracic manipulation in patients with CRPS1 by comparing between the control group and the experimental group.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Enrollment: 30
• Est. completion date: June 20, 2020
• Est. primary completion date: April 1, 2020
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 40 Years to 60 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

• Thirty patients were diagnosed according to International Association for the Study of Pain (IASP) criteria with CRPS I (10 to 18 weeks duration of illness) from both genders and referred from orthopedists post fractures in different upper limb regions (such as shoulder region e.g. clavicle and proximal humerus, elbow region e.g. distal humerus, proximal radius and ulna, and wrist region e.g. distal radius, ulna, and carpal bones), their age was between 40 and 60 years.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Patients who had a stroke, any history of autoimmune or peripheral vascular diseases, diabetes, T4 syndrome, as well as patients, received physical therapy program before

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Complex Regional Pain Syndromes
• Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy
• Somatoform Disorders
• Syndrome

Intervention

Other:
• Traditional physical therapy programe
thoracic manipulation spine at the level of T3 and T4 facet joints (Maitland (screw) technique grade V). Using hypothenar eminence of hands, applying direct downward pressure and additional force-directed caudal with one hand and cephalic with the other hand on the transverse processes.

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
Egypt	Manal M Hassan	Aswan

Sponsors (1)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
South Valley University

Country where clinical trial is conducted

Egypt, 

References & Publications (13)

Angst F, Goldhahn J, Drerup S, Flury M, Schwyzer HK, Simmen BR. How sharp is the short QuickDASH? A refined content and validity analysis of the short form of the disabilities of the shoulder, arm and hand questionnaire in the strata of symptoms and funct — View Citation

Beerthuizen A, Stronks DL, Van't Spijker A, Yaksh A, Hanraets BM, Klein J, Huygen FJPM. Demographic and medical parameters in the development of complex regional pain syndrome type 1 (CRPS1): prospective study on 596 patients with a fracture. Pain. 2012 J — View Citation

Benarroch EE. Pain-autonomic interactions. Neurol Sci. 2006 May;27 Suppl 2:S130-3. Review. — View Citation

Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ. Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med. 2001 Dec;8(12):1153-7. — View Citation

Bruehl S, Maihöfner C, Stanton-Hicks M, Perez RS, Vatine JJ, Brunner F, Birklein F, Schlereth T, Mackey S, Mailis-Gagnon A, Livshitz A, Harden RN. Complex regional pain syndrome: evidence for warm and cold subtypes in a large prospective clinical sample. — View Citation

Dubuis E, Thompson V, Leite MI, Blaes F, Maihöfner C, Greensmith D, Vincent A, Shenker N, Kuttikat A, Leuwer M, Goebel A. Longstanding complex regional pain syndrome is associated with activating autoantibodies against alpha-1a adrenoceptors. Pain. 2014 N — View Citation

Harden RN, Oaklander AL, Burton AW, Perez RS, Richardson K, Swan M, Barthel J, Costa B, Graciosa JR, Bruehl S; Reflex Sympathetic Dystrophy Syndrome Association. Complex regional pain syndrome: practical diagnostic and treatment guidelines, 4th edition. P — View Citation

Hawker GA, Mian S, Kendzerska T, French M. Measures of adult pain: Visual Analog Scale for Pain (VAS Pain), Numeric Rating Scale for Pain (NRS Pain), McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Chronic Pain Grade Scale — View Citation

Kohr D, Singh P, Tschernatsch M, Kaps M, Pouokam E, Diener M, Kummer W, Birklein F, Vincent A, Goebel A, Wallukat G, Blaes F. Autoimmunity against the ß2 adrenergic receptor and muscarinic-2 receptor in complex regional pain syndrome. Pain. 2011 Dec;152(1 — View Citation

Marinus J, Moseley GL, Birklein F, Baron R, Maihöfner C, Kingery WS, van Hilten JJ. Clinical features and pathophysiology of complex regional pain syndrome. Lancet Neurol. 2011 Jul;10(7):637-48. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70106-5. Review. — View Citation

Packham T, Holly J. Complex regional pain syndrome: Measurement matters: Re: Galve-Villa M, Rittig-Rasmussen B, Mikkelsen LMS, Poulsen AG. Complex Regional Pain Syndrome. Manual Therapy 2016;26:e2-3. Man Ther. 2016 Dec;26:e1. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2016.07.0 — View Citation

Sillevis R, Cleland J, Hellman M, Beekhuizen K. Immediate effects of a thoracic spine thrust manipulation on the autonomic nervous system: a randomized clinical trial. J Man Manip Ther. 2010 Dec;18(4):181-90. doi: 10.1179/106698110X12804993427126. — View Citation

Vernon HT, Triano JJ, Ross JK, Tran SK, Soave DM, Dinulos MD. Validation of a novel sham cervical manipulation procedure. Spine J. 2012 Nov;12(11):1021-8. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.10.009. Epub 2012 Nov 15. — View Citation

* Note: There are 13 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	analog scale (VAS)	The patient is asked to draw a line at the point that represents their pain severity perpendicular to the VAS line. The score is measured by calculating the distance (mm) on the 10-cm line between the 'no pain' anchor and the mark of the patient by using a ruler, including a selection of scores from 0-100. A higher score indicates greater pain intensity. The following cut points on the pain VAS have been recommended: no pain (0-4 mm), mild pain (5-44mm), moderate pain (45-74 mm), and severe pain (75- 100 mm). A difference of more than 12 mm is considered the minimum clinically important difference. The patient rated the pain severity at rest.	during 1 day
Primary	functional disability using disability of arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH).	DASH is a self-assessment of symptoms and function of the entire upper extremity. Self-assessment and scoring by calculating the arithmetic mean of at least 27 of the 30 items (missing rule) is transformed by (mean - 1) x 25 into the scale from 0 no symptoms/full function to 100 maximal symptoms/no function for the DASH total score. Five of 6 items are necessary for determination of the symptoms score and 22 of 24 items for the function score. Originally, 0 best and 100 worst. All items are easy to comprehend and are not emotionally sensitive (with the exception of item 21). All items are scored on a scale of 5 (Likert) levels: (1) no difficulty/ symptoms, (2) mild difficulty/ symptoms, (3) moderate difficulty/symptoms, (4) severe difficulty/ symptoms, and (5) extreme difficulty (unable to do)/symptoms. Minimal Clinical Important Difference (MCID): 10.2 points. In our current study, the Arabic version was used	1 week