Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Summary

The purpose of this trial is to compare the morbidity and mortality of CRS-HIPEC using mitomycin-C versus melphalan for colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis. Morbidity and mortality will measured using the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) score, Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE version 4.03), and the Clavien-Dindo Classification.


Clinical Trial Description

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal dissemination of cancer (peritoneal carcinomatosis) from gastrointestinal malignancies, meaning tumor deposits along the inside abdominal or pelvic wall and surfaces of the intestines and organs, has historically been considered a terminal disease. Although peritoneal surface tumors can respond to systemic therapy as a sole form of treatment, patient survival remains poor and cure is considered impossible. A plasma-peritoneal barrier makes systemic therapy relatively ineffective against peritoneal surface disease. In the 1990's, cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal therapy (CRS-HIPEC) began to be popularized as a more effective treatment. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy has several advantages. High-dose chemotherapy can be used due to the plasma-peritoneal barrier resulting in little absorption into the blood stream. Hyperthermia itself has cytotoxic effects and can increase the depth of tumor penetration by the chemotherapeutic agent up to 3 mm and moreover can potentiate its antineoplastic effects. Although CRS-HIPEC has been considered standard treatment for ruptured appendiceal neoplasms and primary peritoneal mesothelioma, in the past decade its indications have broadened to other peritoneal surface malignant processes. Historically, morbidity and mortality associated with CRS-HIPEC was considerably higher than other complex operations, and thus its use was often discouraged. However, in recent times, especially in high-volume centers, morbidity and mortality has drastically improved. Due to recent improvements in mortality after major surgical interventions, including HIPEC, the focus has shifted toward other endpoints besides efficacy, such as morbidity, quality of life and cost. While HIPEC is universally felt to be a vital component after cytoreductive surgery, there is a lack of consensus on the optimal regimen, especially the chemotherapeutic agent that should be used. In the United States, the most commonly used agent during HIPEC is mitomycin-C, however, it remains unknown if mitomycin-C is the optimal drug to use with regards to toxicity and survival. Randomized prospective studies are needed comparing the toxicity and effectiveness of HIPEC with mitomycin-C to other agents. OBJECTIVE: To compare morbidity and mortality after CRS-HIPEC utilizing mitomycin-C versus melphalan. METHODS: In this study, patients will be randomized to one of two treatment arms: Arm 1.) Mitomycin-C initial dose of 15 mg/m2, 45 minutes into the perfusion a maintenance dose of 5 mg/m2 will be administered; or Arm 2): Melphalan 60 mg/m2 45 minutes into the perfusion. Morbidity will be measured during immediate and short-term surgical recovery (up to 90 days post-hospital discharge). Mortality will be measured beginning with the date of surgery and ending with the date of participant death. ;


Study Design


Related Conditions & MeSH terms


NCT number NCT03073694
Study type Interventional
Source University of Kansas Medical Center
Contact Mazin Al-kasspooles, MD
Phone 913-588-6568
Email mal-kasspooles@kumc.edu
Status Recruiting
Phase Phase 2
Start date July 14, 2017
Completion date July 2025

See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT05400122 - Natural Killer (NK) Cells in Combination With Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and Transforming Growth Factor Beta (TGFbeta) Receptor I Inhibitor Vactosertib in Cancer Phase 1
Active, not recruiting NCT05551052 - CRC Detection Reliable Assessment With Blood
Completed NCT00098787 - Bevacizumab and Oxaliplatin Combined With Irinotecan or Leucovorin and Fluorouracil in Treating Patients With Metastatic or Recurrent Colorectal Cancer Phase 2
Recruiting NCT06037954 - A Study of Mental Health Care in People With Cancer N/A
Recruiting NCT05425940 - Study of XL092 + Atezolizumab vs Regorafenib in Subjects With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Phase 3
Suspended NCT04595604 - Long Term Effect of Trimodal Prehabilitation Compared to ERAS in Colorectal Cancer Surgery. N/A
Completed NCT03414125 - Effect of Mailed Invites of Choice of Colonoscopy or FIT vs. Mailed FIT Alone on Colorectal Cancer Screening N/A
Completed NCT02963831 - A Study to Investigate ONCOS-102 in Combination With Durvalumab in Subjects With Advanced Peritoneal Malignancies Phase 1/Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05489211 - Study of Dato-Dxd as Monotherapy and in Combination With Anti-cancer Agents in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumours (TROPION-PanTumor03) Phase 2
Terminated NCT01847599 - Educational Intervention to Adherence of Patients Treated by Capecitabine +/- Lapatinib N/A
Completed NCT05799976 - Text Message-Based Nudges Prior to Primary Care Visits to Increase Care Gap Closure N/A
Recruiting NCT03874026 - Study of Folfiri/Cetuximab in FcGammaRIIIa V/V Stage IV Colorectal Cancer Patients Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT03170960 - Study of Cabozantinib in Combination With Atezolizumab to Subjects With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors Phase 1/Phase 2
Completed NCT03181334 - The C-SPAN Coalition: Colorectal Cancer Screening and Patient Navigation N/A
Completed NCT03167125 - Participatory Research to Advance Colon Cancer Prevention N/A
Recruiting NCT04258137 - Circulating DNA to Improve Outcome of Oncology PatiEnt. A Randomized Study N/A
Not yet recruiting NCT05775146 - SBRT of Metastases Following Neo-adjuvant Treatment for Colorectal Cancer With Synchronous Liver Metastases Phase 2
Recruiting NCT05568420 - A Study of the Possible Effects of Medication on Young Onset Colorectal Cancer (YOCRC)
Recruiting NCT02972541 - Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Verse Surgery Alone After Stent Placement for Obstructive Colonic Cancer N/A
Completed NCT02876224 - Study of Cobimetinib in Combination With Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab in Participants With Gastrointestinal and Other Tumors Phase 1