Outcome
Type |
Measure |
Description |
Time frame |
Safety issue |
Primary |
muscle strength |
Mycroft 3 hand-held dynamometer18: It has good reliability. Muscle strength can be measured in Newton's. It is applied in assessing the muscle strength of subjects. |
Both the experimental group and control group received the intervention once a week for 12 weeks.The measures were done by one experience physical therapist before receiving the intervention and at weeks four, eight, and twelve. |
|
Secondary |
The postural assessment scale for stroke patients (PASS) |
The PASS assesses balance in lying, sitting and standing positions. It was designed specifically for patients with stroke and is suitable for all individuals regardless of postural performance. Its advantage lies in the lack of ceiling effect and floor effect, and the static and dynamic balance of stroke patients can be assessed. It is rated on a scale from 0 to 3, (total score of = 36) The Higher scores indicate better balance in stroke patients. |
Both the experimental group and control group received the intervention once a week for 12 weeks.The measures were done by one experience physical therapist before receiving the intervention and at weeks four, eight, and twelve. |
|
Secondary |
Fugal-Meyer assessment for Lower extremity, |
It is an assessment scale developed from Brunnstrom stage-L/E specifically dedicated to stroke patients. It is rated on a scale from 0 to 2. It has good reliability and validity. |
Both the experimental group and control group received the intervention once a week for 12 weeks.The measures were done by one experience physical therapist before receiving the intervention and at weeks four, eight, and twelve. |
|
Secondary |
Barthel index for Activities of Daily Living (ADL) |
It is a basic scale for functional independence with reliability and validity, covering 10 items such as eating, transposition, personal hygiene, using the bathroom, showering, walking on flat ground, stair climbing, putting on clothes, controlling excretion, etc. The total score ranges from 0 to 100, which is the progressive scope for activities of daily living . |
Both the experimental group and control group received the intervention once a week for 12 weeks.The measures were done by one experience physical therapist before receiving the intervention and at weeks four, eight, and twelve. |
|
Secondary |
Timed up and go test (TUG) |
In the Timed Up and Go Test time is recorded when rising from a chair, walking three metres, turning, and walking back. It has good sensitivity and specificity (sensitivity=87%, specificity=87%), and can assess balance and motor ability. The measured time can predict the fall of stroke patients. |
Both the experimental group and control group received the intervention once a week for 12 weeks.The measures were done by one experience physical therapist before receiving the intervention and at weeks four, eight, and twelve. |
|
Secondary |
Reha Gait® for gait parameters. |
It has high reliability. By wearing the three-axis gyro sensor on the shoes, gait data can be collected and analyzed with a microcomputer via Bluetooth. |
Both the experimental group and control group received the intervention once a week for 12 weeks.The measures were done by one experience physical therapist before receiving the intervention and at weeks four, eight, and twelve. |
|
Secondary |
Passive range of motion (PROM) |
Passive range of motion (PROM) and active range of motion (AROM) of hip, knee and ankle joints: The change in degree is measured with a goniometer before and after training. |
Both the experimental group and control group received the intervention once a week for 12 weeks.The measures were done by one experience physical therapist before receiving the intervention and at weeks four, eight, and twelve. |
|
Secondary |
active range of motion (AROM) |
Passive range of motion (PROM) and active range of motion (AROM) of hip, knee and ankle joints: The change in degree is measured with a goniometer before and after training. |
Both the experimental group and control group received the intervention once a week for 12 weeks.The measures were done by one experience physical therapist before receiving the intervention and at weeks four, eight, and twelve. |
|
Secondary |
The Brunnstrom motor recovery stage of Lower extremity (LE): |
The motor recovery was assessed using Brunnstrom motor recovery stage tool (Brunnstrom, 1970) that classifies it into 6 stages; 1) flaccidity; 2) spasticity is developing; 3) spasticity is maximum; 4) spasticity begins to decrease and some movement combinations become available; 5) spasticity is diminishing and more difficult movement combinations can be accomplish; 6) normal. It has good reliability and validity, and can assess the motor recovery of stroke patients. It is rated on a scale from 1 to 6. |
Both the experimental group and control group received the intervention once a week for 12 weeks.The measures were done by one experience physical therapist before receiving the intervention and at weeks four, eight, and twelve. |
|