Compassion-Focused Therapy for Chronic Pain

Chronic Pain Clinical Trial

Official title:

How do Self-compassion and Psychological Flexibility Mediate Change in a Compassion-Focused Therapy Group for Chronic Pain?

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Recruiting

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT03471637
• Other study ID #: S0815692
• Status: Recruiting
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: February 26, 2018
• Est. completion date: September 30, 2019

Study information

• Verified date: November 2017
• Source: University of Edinburgh
• Contact: Su Tin
• Phone: 0044 131 537 9128
• Email: su.tin[@]nhslothian.scot.nhs.uk
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This research aims to study how Compassion-Focused Therapy (CFT) might work for people with chronic pain. People with chronic pain may feel shameful about their condition and this type of therapy aims to help people to view themselves and their difficulties in a kinder, less critical way (i.e. self-compassion). Currently, no research is available on the effectiveness of CFT in helping people with chronic pain.

Participants attending a CFT-incorporated Pain Management Programme will complete a battery of questionnaires at the start of the group (week 1), in the middle of the group (week 5) and at the end of the group (week 11).

Description:

Pain Management Programmes help people to manage their pain and improve quality of life, and this research will look into the processes by which this happens. This study will look at two psychological concepts: 'self-compassion' (kindness to self) and 'psychological flexibility' (willingness to tolerate difficult experiences in order to meet meaningful goals). These concepts help in understanding how people think about themselves in the context of pain.

Principle Research Question: Do self-compassion and psychological flexibility mediate change (anxiety/depression/well-being) in a Compassion-Focused Therapy group for adults with chronic pain?

Primary Outcome Measure: Strength of mediation effects

Sample Size:

[Reference 1] propose guidelines for recommended sample sizes in order to detect mediation effects with .8 power. These guidelines are informed by existing literature in the field. There is less robust research on self-compassion and chronic pain, therefore, this calculation is based on research in psychological flexibility and chronic pain.

[Reference 2] conducted correlational analyses on the processes of psychological flexibility following a group intervention based on ACT. These processes included acceptance of pain, mindfulness, psychological acceptance and values-based action (r values between 0.33 and 0.55). These positive correlations indicate that the group intervention was related to higher levels of psychological flexibility.

[Reference 3]'s review identified several studies that reported correlational effect sizes between acceptance, and depression/anxiety/daily functioning related to chronic pain (r = -0.58/-0.66/0.47 respectively). These negative correlations illustrate that higher levels of psychological flexibility were related to better outcomes.

Based on these correlational effect sizes, guidelines in [Reference 1] suggest that a sample size of 53-71 is required.

Analysis:

The analysis will focus on the proposed mediating factors (self-compassion and psychological flexibility) and how they explain the outcome of the CFT-incorporated group intervention. In order to study the processes of change, this study will measure change in mediators and outcomes over the course of the group.

In a mediation model, the effect of the independent variable (IV; CFT group) on a dependent variable (DV; outcome/change in symptoms) is conveyed through a third mediating variable. In order to be a mediator, a variable must change during the intervention, be associated with the intervention, and have an impact on the outcome.

In this study, it is hypothesised that self-compassion and/or psychological flexibility are the mediating variables that explain the influence of the group intervention on eventual outcome, i.e. the overall change in symptoms at the end of the group. Linear regression and nonparametric bias-corrected bootstrap, which corrects for skew in the data, will be applied to the data using SPSS, using the PROCESS macro. An effect of mediation will be indicated if the confidence interval does not contain zero.

Missing data will be handled using either the maximum likelihood or multiple imputation method, as recommended in literature.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Recruiting
• Enrollment: 71
• Est. completion date: September 30, 2019
• Est. primary completion date: September 30, 2018
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years and older

Eligibility

Please note this study is only recruiting people who have been referred and accepted onto NHS Lothian's Pain Management Programme (part of the Lothian Pain Service at the Astley Ainslie Hospital).

Inclusion Criteria:

• Fluency of English sufficient for participation in the group and completion of questionnaires

• Aged 18+ (no upper age limit)

• Ability to provide informed consent (as defined by the Five Statutory Principles of the Mental Capacity Act, Code of Practice, 2007)

Exclusion Criteria:

• Active substance misuse

• Active suicidality

• Terminal illness

• Inability to provide informed consent

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Chronic Pain
• Psychological Distress

Intervention

Other:
• Compassion-Focused Therapy
Compassion-Focused Therapy 11 weeks of Compassion-Focused Therapy [based on "Compassion-Focused Therapy for Dummies" (Welford, 2016)]

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United Kingdom	Astley Ainslie Hospital	Edinburgh	Edinburgh City

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
University of Edinburgh	NHS Lothian

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United Kingdom, 

References & Publications (3)

Fritz MS, Mackinnon DP. Required sample size to detect the mediated effect. Psychol Sci. 2007 Mar;18(3):233-9. — View Citation

Hayes SC, Luoma JB, Bond FW, Masuda A, Lillis J. Acceptance and commitment therapy: model, processes and outcomes. Behav Res Ther. 2006 Jan;44(1):1-25. — View Citation

McCracken LM, Gutiérrez-Martínez O. Processes of change in psychological flexibility in an interdisciplinary group-based treatment for chronic pain based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Behav Res Ther. 2011 Apr;49(4):267-74. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2011.02.004. Epub 2011 Feb 15. — View Citation

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Strength of Self-Compassion as a mediator at Week 11		Week 1
Primary	Strength of Psychological Flexibility as a mediator at Week 11		Week 1
Secondary	Self-Compassion Scale (short form, SCS-SF; Neff, 2003)	Minimum score: 12; maximum score: 60; higher score indicates higher level of self-compassion	[Time Frame: Week 1 (start), Week 5 (middle) and Week 11 (end) of group therapy]
Secondary	Multi-Dimensional Psychological Flexibility Inventory (short form, MPFI-SF; Rolffs et al., 2016)	Minimum score: 24; maximum score 144; higher score indicates higher level of psychological flexibility	[Time Frame: Week 1 (start), Week 5 (middle) and Week 11 (end) of group therapy]
Secondary	The Brief Pain Inventory (short form, BPI-SF; Cleeland & Ryan, 1994)	Minimum score: 0; maximum score 110; higher score indicates greater level of pain severity and pain interference (severity max 40 / interference max 70)	[Time Frame: Week 1 (start), Week 5 (middle) and Week 11 (end) of group therapy]
Secondary	The Short Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (SWEMWBS) (Tennant et al., 2007)	Minimum score: 7; maximum score: 35; higher score indicates greater level of wellbeing	[Time Frame: Week 1 (start), Week 5 (middle) and Week 11 (end) of group therapy]
Secondary	The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (Zigmond & Snaith, 1983)	Minimum score: 0; maximum score: 42; higher score indicates higher level of anxiety and depression (anxiety max 21 / depression max 21)	[Time Frame: Week 1 (start), Week 5 (middle) and Week 11 (end) of group therapy]