View clinical trials related to Chemotherapy.
Filter by:This is a prospective, single arm, single center study evaluating the use of a 4-gene panel to predict the occurrence of chemotherapy-induced abnormal thermal threshold in endometrial and ovarian cancer patients receiving post-operative chemotherapy with Carboplatin/Paclitaxel, and stage III colorectal cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOX6. A total of 100 patients will be enrolled during 2017 July~ 2019 June. Blood sample will be collected before chemotherapy to analyze the genetic variants of TRPV1, TRPM2, TRPA1 and ORAI1. All patients will receive neurologic examination (Quantitative Sensory Test, QST) and complete the questionnaires for quality of life (EQ5D & CIPN20). The primary endpoint of this study is to test if the genetic variant of TRPV1, TRPM2, TRPA1, and ORAI1 is a predictive biomarker for the chemotherapy-induced abnormal thermal sensation in cancer patients.
Paclitaxel is a chemotherapy drug that is used to treat breast cancer, one of the most common cancers. It causes two side effects very often - hair-loss and numbness. Until recently, there have been no known ways to prevent or treat either side effect. Recently, cooling of the scalp to prevent hair loss caused by paclitaxel was approved. Our team is developing a method to prevent numbness caused by paclitaxel by using a device that cools the arms and the legs, while applying mild pressure, and this technique is called cryocompression. As scalp cooling use in day-to-day cancer care increases, future studies involving cryocompression to treat neuropathy must take this into account, lest patients be denied or are required to trade-off one treatment for the other. However, there is concern of causing a reduction in core body temperature, which would not be safe or a general intolerance to this treatment. Both scalp cooling and limb cryocompression individually have not shown to cause this, but simultaneous use has not been studied previously. Clinical safety studies, in healthy subjects and cancer patients would need to be conducted to prove this theory, which is being proposed by currently.
Antiemetic therapies have improved in recent years, but chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) are still common and are among the most distressing side effects of chemotherapy. Aprepitant is commercially available in Canada as capsules. An oral liquid aprepitant formulation would be ideal for oral administration to patients unable to swallow capsules.
This study evaluates a simple one day prophylaxis of nausea and vomiting for patients who are getting carboplatin based chemotherapy. In addition to standard oral Dexamethasone and oral Ondansetron, participants will be given a third neurokinin 1 (NK1) antagonist agent, either a single dose of oral Aprepitant or intravenous (IV) Fosaprepitant (they have been shown to be equally effective) to improve prevention of nausea and vomiting. No medications need to be taken beyond day 1.
Background: Nausea and vomiting (emesis) is a common and burdensome side-effect of emetogenic chemotherapy. Emesis affects both the patient's quality of life and induces high costs within the health-care system. Many patients are interested in acupuncture, despite weak scrientific evidence for its effects beside non-specific effects. Few credibly sham-controlled studies have previously been conducted. The therapist's care and communication during acupuncture as well as during standard care may induce non-specific effects, such as placebo effects, potentially driven by the patient's expectations. It is not known if the type of communication, in terms of how positive the therapist communicates regarding expected effects, affects the effect of antiemetic treatments. Aims: To investigate if chemotherapy-induced emesis, treatment expectancy and quality of life differ between patients who receive A) standard care including antiemetics, B) standard care plus sham acupuncture or C) standard treatment plus genuine acupuncture by a therapist who emphasizes the positive expected outcomes of the treatment, compared to a therapist who communicates neutral regarding the expected outcomes. Procedure: The eligible patients will be randomized to A) standard care, including antiemetics or to B) standard treatment plus sham acupuncture or C) standard treatment plus genuine acupuncture. Within the three groups, the patients are randomized to receive either neutral or positive communication with the therapist during the treatment. Outcome measures: The primary outcome is intensity of nausea within the five days after the chemotherapy session in patients receiving positive or neutral communication. Data collection of nausea and vomiting, expectations, and quality of life is performed at baseline the day before the studied chemotherapy session, during 10 days after the studied chemotherapy session, and at a follow-up ten days after the last chemotherapy session.
Chemotherapy induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) is one of the most distressing toxicities of cancer treatment. It can occur up to 90% in case of highly emetogenic chemotherapy (HEC) use. It is important to effectively manage CINV for a number of reasons. Acute phase vomiting can lead to vomiting in the delayed phase. It causes poor compliance with further therapy. Quality of life is compromised. It is easier to prevent nausea/vomiting than to treat it. Though strategies for prevention of CINV have been improved, it is still a significant problem. Newer drugs were explored and studied. The complete response rates were further increased with usage of olanzapine, an FDA approved antipsychotic, which blocks multiple neurotransmitters in the central nervous system. Olanzapine has been studied in multiple randomized trials in adults for its safety and efficacy in prevention of CINV. Various RCTs have demonstrated the superiority of olanzapine for prevention of CINV in patients receiving highly and moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. Olanzapine has been approved for prevention of CINV in adults. Unfortunately there are no large randomized trials demonstrating the efficacy of olanzapine for CINV prevention in children receiving HEC. The positive experience with olanzapine reported in adult oncology patients has prompted some pediatric clinicians to prescribe olanzapine for individual children receiving chemotherapy. Olanzapine is frequently used for the treatment of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder in children and adolescents. Though various studies have demonstrated safety of olanzapine in children, data regarding the efficacy of olanzapine in children and adolescents for prevention of CINV is limited. There are many small studies describing the safety and efficacy of olanzapine for prevention of CINV. However, there are no large randomized trials. Olanzapine is available in generic form and is not an expensive drug. Therefore we would like to conduct a randomized trial to look for the efficacy of olanzapine in pediatric population for prevention of CINV
This study will be conducted at La Liga Contra el Cancer in San Pedro Sula, Honduras. The overall objective of this project is to improve symptom management for patients undergoing chemotherapy in Honduras. The first step in this line of research is a "proof of concept" feasibility study in which the investigators will demonstrate their ability to train nurses to administer a non-pharmacological, telephone-delivered, symptom management program for chemotherapy patients.
Paronychia is inflammation of the skin surrounding the nail that leads to secondary infection. Iatrogenic paronychia has been clearly associated with cancer chemotherapies. This phase-2 trial is a dose finding study and will evaluate topical VBP-926 solution against a vehicle control.
This study is Phase 2 pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) dose-finding study of oral netupitant administered concomitantly with oral palonosetron in pediatric cancer patients for the prevention of nausea and vomiting associated with emetogenic chemotherapy. Two different netupitant dosages will be tested in patients aged from 3 months to < 18 years: 1.33 mg/kg up to a maximum of 100 mg, and 4 mg/kg up to a maximum of 300 mg. All netupitant doses in all age classes will be concomitantly administered with palonosetron 20 μg/kg (up to a maximum dose of 1.5 mg) which is the IV palonosetron dose approved by USA FDA for the pediatric population. The primary objective is to investigate the PK/PD relationship between netupitant exposure (AUC, Cmax) and antiemetic efficacy (CR in delayed phase) after a single oral netupitant administration, concomitantly with oral palonosetron in pediatric cancer patients receiving Moderately Emetogenic Chemotherapy (MEC) or Highly Emetogenic Chemotherapy (HEC) cycles. Efficacy parameter to be used in the correlation is the proportion of patients with Complete Response (CR i.e., no emetic episodes and no rescue medication) during (> 24-120 h after the start of chemotherapy on Day 1). The secondary objectives are to assess the safety and tolerability after single oral administration of netupitant given concomitantly with a single oral administration of palonosetron; to evaluate the pharmacokinetic (AUC, Cmax, tmax and t1/2) of oral palonosetron at the fixed dose of 20 μg/kg in pediatric patients with the concomitant administration of netupitant. A total of 92 pediatric cancer patients receiving either HEC or MEC will be enrolled in the study.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib in combination with second-line FOLFOX or FOLFIRI for metastatic colorectal cancer in patients with disease progression during or after first-line therapy.