Clinical Trials Logo

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Active, not recruiting

Administrative data

NCT number NCT05939440
Other study ID # UAB2198
Secondary ID
Status Active, not recruiting
Phase N/A
First received
Last updated
Start date June 1, 2022
Est. completion date May 26, 2025

Study information

Verified date May 2024
Source University of Alabama at Birmingham
Contact n/a
Is FDA regulated No
Health authority
Study type Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

Financial distress affects 30-70% of cancer patients and describes the burden that patients experience due to the costs of care (CoC). One reason may be because patients lack the appropriate information on CoC that would help them better plan for and manage their CoC. Therefore, the investigators plan to test a Proactive CoC intervention which includes a discussion with a trained educator on CoC information and a Cost Tracking tool to help patients deal with their CoC.


Description:

The investigators will recruit 60 patients diagnosed with gynecologic (ovarian, uterine, cervical, or vulvar cancer), breast or colorectal cancer who are starting a new line of treatment at the O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center. Participants will be randomized to Proactive CoC intervention versus Usual Care. Usual Care consists of the current care processes at the cancer center where information on CoC and financial assistance are only provided once a financial need is identified. The main goal is to compare the change in financial distress from baseline to 6 months to see if patients who received any of the Proactive CoC intervention have improved financial distress compared to those in Usual Care. All participants will complete two main surveys at 0 and 6 months that will ask questions to measure the study outcomes, self-efficacy (patient reported confidence managing certain situations, such as dealing with CoC), depression, anxiety, and insurance knowledge. Participants randomized to any of the Proactive CoC intervention groups will complete three additional phone interviews at 2, 4, and 6 months to check how participants utilized the materials, reasons why they have or have not, and what sections were helpful or not. This study is important to determine whether the Proactive CoC intervention can be successfully delivered, whether the intervention is useful to help patients decrease financial distress, and to inform the design of a future larger study that will include different cancer types and health systems.


Recruitment information / eligibility

Status Active, not recruiting
Enrollment 60
Est. completion date May 26, 2025
Est. primary completion date July 31, 2024
Accepts healthy volunteers No
Gender Female
Age group 18 Years and older
Eligibility Inclusion Criteria: - Newly diagnosed ovarian cancer (i.e., stage II-IV epithelial histology receiving surgery and chemotherapy), or newly diagnosed cervical cancer (i.e., locally advanced stage IB3-IVA receiving chemoradiation), or newly diagnosed uterine cancer (i.e., high-risk histology likely to receive chemotherapy; serous/clear cell), or newly diagnosed stage I-III breast cancer (i.e., high-risk histology), or newly diagnosed stage III-IV Colorectal Cancer - Receiving systemic therapy or radiation at University of Alabama at Birmingham O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center - With health insurance coverage - With reliable access to a phone, mobile device, or Internet Exclusion Criteria: - Unable to read English - Does not agree to complete surveys

Study Design


Intervention

Other:
Proactive Cost of Care (P-COC) intervention
As in Arm description
Usual Care
As in Arm description

Locations

Country Name City State
United States O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center Birmingham Alabama

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor Collaborator
University of Alabama at Birmingham O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center at UAB

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

Outcome

Type Measure Description Time frame Safety issue
Other Health Insurance Literacy Health insurance literacy measure (HILM) measures the ability for individuals to choose and use private health insurance. Given the goals of our intervention to help patients use rather than choose health insurance, questions included those assessing confidence using insurance (5 questions) and being proactive when using health insurance (4 questions). Each question is assessed on a scale from 1 (not at all confident) to 4 (very confident). Within each domain (confidence using insurance, being proactive when using health insurance), a higher score indicates more confidence or being more proactive, respectively. Baseline
Other Health Insurance Literacy Health insurance literacy measure (HILM) measures the ability for individuals to choose and use private health insurance. Given the goals of our intervention to help patients use rather than choose health insurance, questions included those assessing confidence using insurance (5 questions) and being proactive when using health insurance (4 questions). Each question is assessed on a scale from 1 (not at all confident) to 4 (very confident). Within each domain (confidence using insurance, being proactive when using health insurance), a higher score indicates more confidence or being more proactive, respectively. 6 months
Other Health Insurance Knowledge Kaiser Health Insurance Knowledge Survey - 10 items - Scores range from 0-10 based on number of correct responses. Baseline
Other Health Insurance Knowledge Kaiser Health Insurance Knowledge Survey - 10 items - Scores range from 0-10 based on number of correct responses. 6 months
Primary Financial Distress FD measured using the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) (12 items) The score ranges from 0 to 44 with lower scores indicating worse financial distress. A Score <26 indicates financial distress is present. Baseline
Primary Financial Distress FD measured using the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) (12 items). The score ranges from 0 to 44 with lower scores indicating worse financial distress. A Score <26 indicates financial distress is present. 6 months
Secondary Self Efficacy Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Self-Efficacy Scale (10 items). Questions ask patients to rate their level of confidence managing situations, problems, and events related to dealing with costs of care. Responses are on a scale of 1 "I am not at all confident" to 5 "I am very confident." Self-efficacy is scored by converting raw scores into a T-score resulting in a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10.A higher score indicates more self-efficacy. Baseline
Secondary Self Efficacy Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Self-Efficacy Scale (10 items). Questions ask patients to rate their level of confidence managing situations, problems, and events related to dealing with costs of care. Responses are on a scale of 1 "I am not at all confident" to 5 "I am very confident." Self-efficacy is scored by converting raw scores into a T-score resulting in a standardized score with a mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. A higher score indicates more self-efficacy. 6 months
Secondary Depression Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Responses range from 0 "Not at all" to 3 "Nearly every day". Cut points of 5, 10, 15, and 20 are used for mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression. Investigators will dichotomize into mild vs. at least moderate depression. Baseline
Secondary Depression Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9). Responses range from 0 "Not at all" to 3 "Nearly every day". Cut points of 5, 10, 15, and 20 are used for mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression. Investigators will dichotomize into mild vs. at least moderate depression. 6 months
Secondary Anxiety General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7). Responses range from 0 "Not at all" to 3 "Nearly every day". Cut points of 5, 10, and 15 are used for mild, moderate, and severe anxiety. Responses will be dichotomized into mild vs. at least moderate anxiety. Baseline
Secondary Anxiety General Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7). Responses range from 0 "Not at all" to 3 "Nearly every day". Cut points of 5, 10, and 15 are used for mild, moderate, and severe anxiety. Responses will be dichotomized into mild vs. at least moderate anxiety. 6 months
Secondary Stress Weekly Stress Inventory - Short Form (WSI-SF). 25-item self-report scale that measures the number of minor stressors that occur in one week. Individual items are scored on an 8-point Likert scale. Two scores are obtained, the event score (WSI-SFE), which ranges from 0-25, and the impact score (WSI-SFI), which ranges from 0-175. A higher event score indicates more stressors and a higher impact score indicates a higher impact from these stressors. Baseline
Secondary Stress Weekly Stress Inventory - Short Form (WSI-SF). 25-item self-report scale that measures the number of minor stressors that occur in one week. Individual items are scored on an 8-point Likert scale. Two scores are obtained, the event score (WSI-SFE), which ranges from 0-25, and the impact score (WSI-SFI), which ranges from 0-175. A higher event score indicates more stressors and a higher impact score indicates a higher impact from these stressors. 6 months
See also
  Status Clinical Trial Phase
Recruiting NCT06223308 - A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of HB0028 in Subjects With Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 1/Phase 2
Terminated NCT03367871 - Combination Pembrolizumab, Chemotherapy and Bevacizumab in Patients With Cervical Cancer Phase 2
Active, not recruiting NCT04537156 - Efficacy, Immunogenicity and Safty Study of Recombinant Human Papillomavirus Vaccine(6,11,16,18,31,33,45,52,58 Type)(E.Coli) Phase 3
Recruiting NCT03668639 - Safety and Antiemetic Efficacy of Akynzeo Plus Dexamethasone During Radiotherapy and Concomitant Weekly Cisplatin Phase 2/Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT04242199 - Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of INCB099280 in Participants With Advanced Solid Tumors Phase 1
Withdrawn NCT04806945 - A Phase III Study to Evaluate Efficacy and Safety of First-Line Treatment With HLX10 + Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Cervical Cancer Phase 3
Active, not recruiting NCT04185389 - Long-Term Follow-Up of HPV FOCAL Participants
Withdrawn NCT03007771 - Magnetic Resonance-guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound (MR-HIFU) Used for Mild Hyperthermia Phase 1
Completed NCT03384511 - The Use of 18F-ALF-NOTA-PRGD2 PET/CT Scan to Predict the Efficacy and Adverse Events of Apatinib in Malignancies. Phase 4
Recruiting NCT05107674 - A Study of NX-1607 in Adults With Advanced Malignancies Phase 1
Completed NCT05120167 - Strategies for Endocervical Canal Investigation in Women With Abnormal Screening Cytology and Negative Colposcopy N/A
Recruiting NCT05483491 - KK-LC-1 TCR-T Cell Therapy for Gastric, Breast, Cervical, and Lung Cancer Phase 1
Recruiting NCT05736588 - Elimisha HPV (Human Papillomavirus) N/A
Completed NCT05862844 - Promise Women Project N/A
Recruiting NCT04934982 - Laparoscopic or Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer(Stage IA1 With LVSI, IA2) N/A
Recruiting NCT03876860 - An Enhanced Vaginal Dilator to Reduce Radiation-Induced Vaginal Stenosis N/A
Completed NCT03652077 - A Safety and Tolerability Study of INCAGN02390 in Select Advanced Malignancies Phase 1
Completed NCT00543543 - Broad Spectrum HPV (Human Papillomavirus) Vaccine Study in 16-to 26-Year-Old Women (V503-001) Phase 3
Terminated NCT04864782 - QL1604 Plus Chemotherapy in Subjects With Stage IVB, Recurrent, or Metastatic Cervical Cancer Phase 2/Phase 3
Recruiting NCT04226313 - Self-sampling for Non-attenders to Cervical Cancer Screening N/A