View clinical trials related to Cardiogenic Shock.
Filter by:Extracorporeal life support is increasingly used after cardiac surgery. Despite improved technology, outcome still remains poor. This retrospective multicenter cohort study aims to find the (risk) factors associated with the poor prognosis of these patients. Adult patients who received ECLS after cardiac surgery between 2000 and 2018 are eligible for inclusion
Cardiogenic shock (CGS) affects up to 10% of patients suffering acute coronary syndrome. It has a 30 day mortality of 45-50%. No pharmacological nor intervention/device trials have had any impact on this mortality in the last 20 years. The EURO SHOCK Trial (supported by the European Union Horizons 2020 programme) will randomise 428 patients with CGS following acute coronary syndrome from 44 EU centres to early intervention with Extra Corporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) therapy or to standard treatment (with no ECMO). This intervention is a high cost specialist centre procedure that warrants further investigation including economic appraisal. Multiple mechanistic and hypothesis generating sub-studies will be undertaken.
The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to evaluate the hemodynamic effect of low dose corticosteroid therapy (hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone) in the treatment of adult cardiogenic shock.
The EVOLVE-ECMO(Early Left Atrial Venting Versus Conventional Treatment For Left VEntricular Decompression During Venoarterial ExtraCorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Support) study is a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the prognostic effect of early LA venting(when detect B-line on serial lung ultrasound) on weaning VA-ECMO support in refractory CS who receive VA-ECMO support. The aim of EVOLVE-ECMO trial is to test the hypothesis that early LA venting would result in a significant reduction in failure of weaning ECMO support in refractory CS.
Evaluate the evolution of diaphragmatic muscle effort in cardiogenic shock in ECMO patient with ultrasounds during the first weaning attempt in intensive care patients.
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is a temporary mechanical circulatory support device for cardiogenic shock (CS) patients. During extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support, the inflammatory response is intense and complex. It may cause infection, cell damage, organ dysfunction and even death. Hemoperfusion can adsorb inflammatory factors and reduce the inflammatory reaction. CS patients who are likely to receive veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) support will be enrolled and randomized with a 1:1 allocation to a simultaneous hemoperfusion arm vs. standard care arm. 1. The patients in the simultaneous hemoperfusion arm will receive hemoperfusion when extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is commenced. 2. The patients in the standard care arm will not receive hemoperfusion when extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is commenced. The primary outcome is the change of plasma interleukin (IL)-6 level after hemoperfusion is commenced.
Recent studies have suggested that the use of left ventricular ejection volume index calculation may aid in the hemodynamic management of critically ill patients. However, a prospective and randomized comparison in patients with heart failure for inotropic dose adjustment has not been described. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ejection volume index versus liberal strategy in adjusting dobutamine dose in patients with heart failure and low cardiac output. Methodology: A unicentric, randomized and prospective study will be performed in a comparative manner. Hospital data (test results, medical outcomes, dobutamine dose, complications) of patients will be analyzed for safety and effectiveness. Expected results: The use of ejection volume index is not inferior to the liberal strategy in the initial adjustment of the dose of dobutamine in patients with heart failure.
This study evaluates the use of early mechanical circulatory support in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction and cardiogenic shock. Patients are treated according to the National Cardiogenic Shock Initiative protocol, which emphasizes early identification of cardiogenic shock and rapid delivery of mechanical circulatory support based on invasive hemodynamics. All patients treated in this manner are enrolled in the National Cardiogenic Shock registry.
The aim of the study is to examine whether treatment with extracorporeal life support (ECLS) in addition to revascularization with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or alternatively coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and optimal medical treatment is beneficial in comparison to no ECLS in patients with severe infarctrelated cardiogenic shock with respect to 30-day mortality
Prevalence of cardiogenic shock in acute coronary syndrome patients is reported at about 5-8% with high fatality. Revascularization approach has already known as the standard of care, but the usage of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) as mechanical circulatory support is still a controversy. IABP SHOCK II trial revealed that short-term mortality did not improved by IABP but there are several essential variabels related to mortality that are not considered in the study which are IABP initiation time and weaning protocol.This study aim to evalute the effect of IABP prior to revascularization on mortality of patients with myocardial infarction complicated with shock. 92 subjects will be enrolled in this randomized controlled trial into two groups, with and without IABP. IABP group will be receiving the intervention prior to revascularization. The primary outcomes to be sought are in-hospital and 30-day mortality after revascularization. IABP effects measured by various indicators such as Global Longitudinal Strain by echocardiography on the 1st and 3rd day, NTproBNP and ST2 level on the 1st, 3rd and 5th day, effective lactate clearance and ureum creatinine level on the 1st and 3rd day and will be compared between two groups. Continous variabel will be presented in mean ± deviation standard or median, and analized with Student's t test or Mann-Whitney U test as appropriate.