View clinical trials related to Carcinoma.
Filter by:- The surgical device used to perform PIPAC procedure is commercialized by a single manufacturer under a monopoly regimen, and a formal training (economically supported by the manufacturer) is mandatory for surgeons who want to buy the device.Relations with the company and solutions to extend training require specific analysis from an ethical point of view. - Based on the growing number of published papers from a growing number of international centers, the controlled training model is not limiting, and it is a successful model of development of this breakthrough innovation. - But with the major involvement of the industry and the control of training, the different levels of interest could induce ethical questions.
Phase I study of RO7119929 given orally to participants with unresectable advanced or metastatic primary liver cancers and other solid tumors with predominant liver involvement. The primary objective of the study is to explore the safety and to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or optimal biologic dose (OBD) of RO7119929 as single agent.
The purpose of this study is to test the safety and effectiveness of immunotherapy (checkpoint inhibitor therapy) in advanced bladder cancer when given intermittently. An unanswered question with the use of CPI (checkpoint inhibitor) is the duration of therapy required for optimal clinical benefit. In the absence of progressive disease or unacceptable toxicities, there are currently no specified criteria for treatment discontinuation. Strategies to reduce toxicity and maximize benefit require investigation. Thus, novel dosing schedules, early discontinuation considerations, and biomarkers of response are needed to identify patients who can sustain disease regression while off of therapy.
This is a phase II, open-label, single-arm, multicenter study of the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab treatment in participants with advanced thymic carcinoma who failed prior systemic therapy.
Cabozantinib, a small molecule directed to vascular endothelial growth factor receptors, MET and AXL, has shown to significantly improve the overall survival (OS) over placebo in the randomized phase 3 CELESTIAL trial in patients who had up to two lines of prior systemic therapy (including sorafenib) with progression on at least one in comparison to patients who received best supportive care. Although cabozantinib shares similar targets with sorafenib/regorafenib, they present different toxicity profile. While the most common grade 3-4 Adverse Events reported for sorafenib were fatigue (4%), diarrhea (8%), hand-foot reaction (8%) and hypertension (2%); the most frequent grade 3-4 Adverse Events for cabozantinib were hand-foot reaction (3.6%), hypertension (3.4%) and elevation of AST (2.6%). In clinical practice, regorafenib, ramucirumab and cabozantinib are approved by European Medicines Agency (EMA) as second-line treatment approved by EMA until now. However, more than 40% of candidate patients to 2nd line do not meet the RESORCE criteria or REACH-2 trial and are only candidates to cabozantinib treatment. However, investigators do not have safety data about those patients who are treated with other treatments than sorafenib in first line neither data about the real impact of sorafenib-intolerant patients according to the RESORCE trial definition. For this reason, investigators propose to explore the role of cabozantinib in patients who were not considered in the CELESTIAL trial.
Clinical trial to evaluate the performance characteristics(sensitivity and specificity) of AnchorDx's urine DNA methylation/somatic mutation profiling assay for detecting urothelial carcinoma compared to pathology in patients.
The European VALHUDES study is a Clinical Performance /Diagnostic Test Accuracy Study that aims to evaluate whether HPV testing with new assays performed on self-samples, collected by means of a vaginal and a urine collection device is as accurate to detect cervical pre-cancer as on cliniciantaken cervical samples.
Regorafenib and nivolumab are proven effective agents for the management of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma patients. As preclinical studies have suggested potential synergism between antiangiogenic agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors, regorafenib and nivolumab may have synergism in terms of efficacy. Herein, this study investigates the combination of regorafenib and nivolumab as first-line therapy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.
This clinical trial evaluates whether 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI or PET/CT can improve upon the diagnosis and management of liver cancer. MRI stands for magnetic resonance imaging, a scan that uses magnetic and radio waves to produce detailed structural information of the organs, tissues and structures within the body. PET stands for positron emission tomography, an imaging test that helps to measure the information about functions of tissues and organs within the body. A PET scan uses a radioactive drug (radiotracer) to show this activity. CT scan uses X-rays to create images of the bones and internal organs within the body. In patients that have been diagnosed with liver cancer, a protein called prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) appears in large amounts on the surface of the cancerous cells. The radioactive chemical compound (68Ga-PSMA) has been designed to circulate through the body and attach itself to the PSMA protein on liver cancer cells. 68Ga-PSMA PET/MRI or PET/CT may be better in diagnosing and managing liver cancer.
This study aims at estimating the proportion of patients diagnosed with locoregional renal cell carcinoma who are at high risk for recurrence following nephrectomy, describe referral patterns, and characterize treatment in this population. Outcomes including estimation of the incidence of recurrence and disease-free interval following nephrectomy will be reported overall and among the subgroup off patients receiving adjuvant systemic therapy with sunitinib following nephrectomy.