View clinical trials related to Carcinoma, Hepatocellular.
Filter by:Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus antiangiogenic agents can achieve better efficacy than sorafenib in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) within a certain period of time, but more than half of the patients are still insensitive to the treatment. There is no evidence-based basis for second-line treatment after the progression of the disease.In view of the effectiveness of Hepatic arterial infusion (HAIC) in the first-line treatment of HCC in the Chinese population, this study intends to launch a prospective intervention study to explore the efficacy and safety of HAIC treatment in patients with advanced HCC after the failure of ICIs and antiangiogenic agents combination therapy, and to provide high-level evidence for optimizing the second-line treatment of advanced HCC in the future.
This is a phase 3, multicentri, randomised, open label study. The purpose is to investigate the safety and efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and lenvatinib (LEN) in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus.
The aim of this study is to the efficacy, prognosis, adverse effects, and factors for predicting therapeutic effects and clinical prognosis of combined therapy of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), Anti-VEGF antibodies or pan-target anti-angiogenic drugs, and anti-PD-1/ PD-L1 antibody for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma which initially unsuitable for the radical therapy, including resection, transplantation, or ablation.
To learn if giving immune checkpoint therapy (such as atezolizumab) and bevacizumab to patients who have HCC and are receiving DAAs may help to control HCC and hepatitis C.
The goal of this study is Utility of abbrevational magnetic resonance imaging as a screening tool for hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients. The primary objective of the study is: • HCC detection rate of US vs AMRI in cirrhotic patients The secondary objective of the study are: - False referral rate of US vs AMRI: false referral will be defined as lack of HCC on complete MRI despite a positive US or AMRI. - Positive predictive value of US vs AMRI: The positive predictive value will be defined as the number of patients with true positive results in patients with positive US/AMRI. Participants will be evaluated by two rounds of screening 6 months apart using paired US and non-enhanced AMRI.
This study is conducted to evaluate the efficacy, prognosis, adverse effects, and factors for predicting therapeutic effects and clinical prognosis of combined therapy of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC), tyrosine kinase inhibitor/ anti-VEGF antibody, and anti-PD-1/ PD-L1 antibody for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma which initially unsuitable for the radical therapy, including resection, transplantation, or ablation. Factors are collected in preoperative routine blood examination, preoperative radiological imaging and pathological examination.
This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of aprepitant combined with granisetron and dexamethasone versus granisetron and dexamethasone in the prevention of nausea and vomiting in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC).
The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the added value of 166Holmium SIRT to Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab in patients with non resectable HCC. The primary endpoint is the Best Objective Response Rate at 6 months after 166Holmium SIRT according to mRECIST. Participants will be treated by : - Approved first line systemic therapy: Atezolizumab (1200mg Q3W, IV) with Bevacizumab (15mg/kg Q3W, IV) - In combination with 166Holmium selective internal intra-arterial radiation therapy (Quirem Spheres®, the investigational medical device) after a work-up phase considered as "favorable". Participants will be followed up to 12 months after the first cycle of Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab therapy.
This clinical trial studies how well 3-dimensional multi-parametric ultrasound (3D MPUS) imaging works as a decision-support tool for patients with liver tumors undergoing therapy. Continuous and dynamic imaging of patients undergoing therapy is required to monitor early-phase treatment response. 3D-MPUS is an inexpensive and safe method, which may provide complementary quantitative functional (perfusion) and tissue characterization information to anatomical radiological assessment or blood biomarkers.
This study aims to evaluate the impact of non-invasive CT-based Hepatic Venous Pressure Gradient (HVPG) assessment on prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).