View clinical trials related to Carcinoma, Hepatocellular.
Filter by:Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver malignancy with most patients developing HCC due to chronic liver diseases. Unfortunately, HCC has a morality to incidence ratio that approaches 1. Among the etiological factors associated with HCC, hepatitis C virus (HCV) and Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections are major risk factors. Despite HBV vaccination programs and effective direct antiviral agents (DAA) for treatment of HCV, the incidence of virus-related HCC remains high. HCV eradication by antiviral treatment reduces but does not eliminate HCC risk. Patients with HCV-related cirrhosis require HCC surveillance even after sustained virologic response (SVR) due to a persistent risk of HCC even years after SVR . In Egypt, HCC represents the fourth common cancer and is the most common cause of mortality-related and morbidity-related cancer. Egypt ranks the third and 15th most populous country in Africa and worldwide, respectively, and the Egyptian health authorities consider HCC as one of the most challenging health problems for the current decade. Both HCC screening and monitoring efforts have improved significantly since 2018 as a result of the national screening campaign .The early diagnosis of HCC is essential to initiate curative treatments to improve short term and long-term prognosis. Therefore, highly effective methods are needed to detect HCC at an earlier stage. American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) and European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) guidelines recommend the periodic use of ultrasound scanning (USS), with or without Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) evaluation, for HCC surveillance. However, suboptimal performance of USS has been reported, with its sensitivity being compromised by the extent of liver cirrhosis, high body mass index (BMI), etiology of liver disease, expertise of the operator and quality of the equipment. Moreover, its sensitivity and specificity for early-stage HCC was found to be rather low . Serum biomarkers play an essential role in diagnosing HCC, as biomarkers are often more convenient, inexpensive, non-invasive, and reproducible . Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) is a widely used biomarker for HCC diagnosis. The diagnostic accuracy of AFP is limited, however, due to its high false-negative rate to detect small or early stage tumors. As previous studies have demonstrated, the sensitivity of AFP among patients with HCC was 52% for tumors > 3cm and dropped to only 25% for tumors < 3cm. In addition, AFP may also be elevated in some benign liver diseases, such as chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis even in the absence of HCC.
Compared to systemic therapy alone, conversion therapy is promising to improve the prognosis of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Triple therapy (lenvatinib combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and camrelizumab) may have significant efficacy in conversion therapy for patients with advanced HCC, but its safety and efficacy remain unknown. To address this, we have designed a randomized, open-label, parallel-controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of lenvatinib combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization and camrelizumab versus lenvatinib combined with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization in conversion resection for advanced HCC. Totally 196 patients with BCLC C stage HCC will be rigorously screened and included, and the primary endpoints of the study are overall survival. This study aims to provide valuable insights into new treatment strategies for advanced HCC.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mRNA vaccine for HBV-positive Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.
This is a Phase 2, open-label, 2-cohort clinical study evaluating RP3 in combination with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab as First- or Second-line Systemic Therapy in patients with locoregionally advanced and/or metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma not amenable to surgical resection or standard locoregionally directed therapies.
Background: This study aims to test whether 5% lidocaine patches can reduce Radiofrequency ablation-induced pain. Methods: The study will enroll patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and schedule a radiofrequency ablation procedure. 200 patients will be invited to allocate randomly into study or control groups: pretreatment with a 5% lidocaine patch (LidotopⓇ) (Group A); pretreatment with a placebo patch (Group B); The skin patch is applied before Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) while admission, and is changed every day till discharge. Pain severity is evaluated by a visual analog scale using a 10-point scale recorded by a study nurse before RFA and after the procedure. The demographic data, hepatocellular carcinoma characteristics, analgesics usage, patient satisfaction with pain control, and visual analog scale will be compared between the two groups. Anticipated results: Pretreatment with 5% lidocaine patches is an effective and straight method of reducing Radiofrequency ablation-induced pain to reduce analgesics usage and improve patient satisfaction with pain control.
The effectiveness and safety of fully covered metal stent in malignant biliary obstruction caused by HCC are still unknown. These would be clarified in this prospective cohort study.
I) Introduction Patients with cancer face difficult choices that require balancing competing priorities such as survival, functional capacity and symptom relief. Most patients with advanced cancer (>80%) expect frank yet sensitive discussions with their physicians about prognosis and treatment choices in order to be involved in the decision-making process. Nevertheless, this kind of discussion is frequently lacking, and consequently, patients often have a biased view of their own prognosis such as an underestimation of disease severity, or unrealistic expectations for cure. Patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may be treated with systemic therapies which may prolong survival but are not curative. Patients with advanced HCC often report expectations for survival and treatment-related side effects that differ from their treating physician. Accordingly, communication on prognostic and treatment choices is essential to obtain an accurate understanding of the disease that allows patients to make informed decisions. To the best of our knowledge, a thorough evaluation of the physician-patient communication quality has never been performed in advanced HCC patients. The aim of our study is to assess the perception of the expected prognosis and treatment side effects by the patient and his physician during the first consultation before the initiation of a new systemic therapy. II) Type of study: Prospective, observational, non-interventional multicentric study III) Outcomes III.1) Primary Outcome Evaluate the concordance between the patient's perception of his prognosis and treatment side effects with the one of his treating physician. III.2) Secondary Outcomes - Compare the patient's expectations for the aforementioned items to those of his physician and the degree of concordance between them. - Evaluation of patient satisfaction with the information received during the consultation - Assessment of patient-reported symptoms of anxiety and depression - Evaluate the association between individual prognosis expectation (i.e., patient and physician) and data from the available literature. IV) Recruitment All consecutive patients with a new systemic treatment prescribed for HCC in participating centres will be included for a period of 1 year.
The goal of this clinical trial is to test the outcomes of HBsAg(+) patients in the treatments of NAs vs NAs plus IFN . The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. Clinical effect analysis of nucleoside analogs (NAs) group a group and NAs plus interferon group after 48 weeks of treatment; 2. Repetitive effect and time effect of different drug treatment at different follow-up time points; 3. To evaluate the difference of therapeutic effect of NAs or NAs combined with interferon; 4. Follow up and compare the incidence of early liver cancer in each group. Participants will be asked to receive NAs or NAs combined with interferon treatments, and Regular blood sampling and color ultrasound examination. Researchers will compare control group to see if occurrence of liver cancer.
To compare the predictive ability of ALBI and PALBI grades with CTP and MELD scores. To investigate the efficacy of ALBI and PALBI grades for predicting the prognosis of HCC and overall survival among different modalities of treatment.
This is a prospective clinical study aiming to test the safety and efficacy of lenvatinib in combination with Aurora kinase A inhibitor VIC-1911 in participate with lenvatinib-unresponsive or lenvatinib-resistant hepatocellular carcinoma(HCC).