Cancer Clinical Trial
Official title:
Evaluation of Pain and Postoperative Nausea Vomiting Incidence in Outpatient Surgery at IUCT-Oncopole Hospital
NCT number | NCT03669328 |
Other study ID # | 16HLGENF01 |
Secondary ID | |
Status | Completed |
Phase | |
First received | |
Last updated | |
Start date | June 1, 2016 |
Est. completion date | June 30, 2018 |
Verified date | August 2018 |
Source | Institut Claudius Regaud |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Observational [Patient Registry] |
The effectiveness of the analgesic and anti-nausea prevention techniques of the investigators
justifies being evaluated regularly in order to adapt the management strategy to the
specificities of each surgical act.
A first evaluation took place in June 2016 and allowed to identify a category of patients
(partial breast surgery with or without axillary gesture) not benefiting from an ideal
algological management because justifying in 30% of the cases of a level 3 analgesic remedy
in the postoperative recovery room. This use of morphine results in a significant incidence
of postoperative nausea and prolonged recovery time before return home harmful to the
patient.
With their experience in locoregional anesthesia technique in complete breast surgery (total
mastectomy) and aware of the effectiveness of this type of anesthesia on the management of
immediate and chronic pain, the investigators have extended their indications of ALR to
partial breast surgery in ambulatory.
Status | Completed |
Enrollment | 200 |
Est. completion date | June 30, 2018 |
Est. primary completion date | June 30, 2016 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | No |
Gender | All |
Age group | 18 Years and older |
Eligibility |
Inclusion Criteria: - patients admitted for ambulatory surgery under general anesthesia - patients admitted during the period from 01 to 30 June 2016 or during the period from 18 to 5 July 2018 Exclusion Criteria: - Patient neither French nor English, - Patient refusing to participate in this study - Minor patients were excluded to ensure the homogeneity of the surveyed population (satisfaction of minors not meeting the same characteristics as that of adults) |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
France | Institut Claudius Regaud | Toulouse | Occitanie |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
Institut Claudius Regaud |
France,
Blanco R, Fajardo M, Parras Maldonado T. Ultrasound description of Pecs II (modified Pecs I): a novel approach to breast surgery. Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim. 2012 Nov;59(9):470-5. doi: 10.1016/j.redar.2012.07.003. Epub 2012 Aug 29. — View Citation
Bouhassira D, Attal N, Alchaar H, Boureau F, Brochet B, Bruxelle J, Cunin G, Fermanian J, Ginies P, Grun-Overdyking A, Jafari-Schluep H, Lantéri-Minet M, Laurent B, Mick G, Serrie A, Valade D, Vicaut E. Comparison of pain syndromes associated with nervous — View Citation
Fuzier R, Puel F, Izard P, Sommet A, Pierre S. Prospective cohort study assessing chronic pain in patients following minor surgery for breast cancer. J Anesth. 2017 Apr;31(2):246-254. doi: 10.1007/s00540-016-2288-9. Epub 2016 Nov 24. — View Citation
Gärtner R, Jensen MB, Nielsen J, Ewertz M, Kroman N, Kehlet H. Prevalence of and factors associated with persistent pain following breast cancer surgery. JAMA. 2009 Nov 11;302(18):1985-92. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1568. Erratum in: JAMA. 2012 Nov 21;308(19) — View Citation
Kumar SP. Utilization of brief pain inventory as an assessment tool for pain in patients with cancer: a focused review. Indian J Palliat Care. 2011 May;17(2):108-15. doi: 10.4103/0973-1075.84531. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Evaluation of pain after surgery by Simple Verbal Evaluation | Pain level in post-operative room measured by Simple Verbal Evaluation. The simple verbal scale or Keele scale has 5 qualifiers to describe the intensity of the pain, each descriptor is associated with a numerical value. 0 = no pain, 1 = poor, 2 = moderate, 3 = intense, 4 = atrocious. The goal of management is to achieve pain values below 3 (low to moderate). |
1 day (the day of the surgery) | |
Secondary | Incidence of postopérative nausea and vomiting after prevention strategy guided by Apfel score risk | The risk of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is evaluated by the Apfel score and a preventive strategy correlated to this score is then determined. An order including anti-emetics and analgesics is given to the patient for the return home after the outpatient surgery. The Apfel score includes four variables (Female sex, History of motion sickness or postoperative nausea and vomiting, Nonsmoker, Postoperative opioid treatment is planned) and assigns one point for each. | 1 day before surgery | |
Secondary | Medical procedure characteristics | The type of anesthesia performed, the surgical procedure as well as the analgesic strategy (ALR) and the antinausea strategy performed. | 1 day (the day of the surgery) | |
Secondary | Evaluation of pain after surgery by Opioid requirements | Pain level in post-operative room measured and opioid requirement if important pain persists. The scale used is the "visual analogue scale ". If EVA> 3 titration with morphine 1 mg per 1 mg is performed in the recovery room until an EVA <3 is obtained. The dose of morphine in mg necessary to achieve this objective is collected. | 3 days (from surgery to 3 days after) | |
Secondary | Evaluation of home-based return capability by CHUNG score | Patients are then monitored in an outpatient surgery unit until they have a home-based return capability assessed by the CHUNG score, including the level of pain (moderate and well relieved), the absence of persistent nausea, and the ability to ambulation.Points are assigned to six variables : level of consciousness, physical activity, hemodynamic stability, oxygen saturation, pain, emetic symptoms. A score of 9 or 10 is needed to allow the patient to leave the hospital. | 1 day (just after the surgery) | |
Secondary | Evaluation of pain at home after surgery at mobility by EVA during the first 3 days | Pain level (Analogic Visual Evaluation EVA) on the first 3 days after surgery at mobility. The EVA is a numeric scale of pain. The patient must estimate his pain level from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the most unsustainable pain ever experienced). The question asked by phone is "between 0 no pain and 10 excruciating pain, where would you place your pain on this scale?" This scale is validated by the entire scientific community as the most sensitive and above all the most reproducible and can be obtained by phone. an acceptable pain is <3 therefore mild to moderate. |
3 days (from surgery to 3 days after) | |
Secondary | Evaluation of pain at home after surgery at rest by EVA during the first 3 days | Pain level (Analogic Visual Evaluation EVA) on the first 3 days after surgery, at rest. The EVA is a numeric scale of pain. The patient must estimate his pain level from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the most unsustainable pain ever experienced). The question asked by phone is "between 0 no pain and 10 excruciating pain, where would you place your pain on this scale?" This scale is validated by the entire scientific community as the most sensitive and above all the most reproducible and can be obtained by phone. an acceptable pain is <3 therefore mild to moderate. |
3 days (from surgery to 3 days after) | |
Secondary | Evaluation of sleep quality | Sleep quality (wake up by pain or not during the night) during the 3 days after surgery. Patient is asked to answer yes or not to the question : Have you been awakened by pain during the night" during first 3 days | 3 days (from surgery to 3 days after) |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Recruiting |
NCT05346796 -
Survivorship Plan HEalth REcord (SPHERE) Implementation Trial
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05094804 -
A Study of OR2805, a Monoclonal Antibody Targeting CD163, Alone and in Combination With Anticancer Agents
|
Phase 1/Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT04867850 -
Effect of Behavioral Nudges on Serious Illness Conversation Documentation
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT04086251 -
Remote Electronic Patient Monitoring in Oncology Patients
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01285037 -
A Study of LY2801653 in Advanced Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Completed |
NCT00680992 -
Study of Denosumab in Subjects With Giant Cell Tumor of Bone
|
Phase 2 | |
Completed |
NCT00062842 -
Study of Irinotecan on a Weekly Schedule in Children
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT04548063 -
Consent Forms in Cancer Research: Examining the Effect of Length on Readability
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04337203 -
Shared Healthcare Actions and Reflections Electronic Systems in Survivorship
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04349293 -
Ex-vivo Evaluation of the Reactivity of the Immune Infiltrate of Cancers to Treatments With Monoclonal Antibodies Targeting the Immunomodulatory Pathways
|
N/A | |
Terminated |
NCT02866851 -
Feasibility Study of Monitoring by Web-application on Cytopenia Related to Chemotherapy
|
N/A | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT05304988 -
Development and Validation of the EFT for Adolescents With Cancer
|
||
Completed |
NCT04448041 -
CRANE Feasibility Study: Nutritional Intervention for Patients Undergoing Cancer Surgery in Low- and Middle-Income Countries
|
||
Completed |
NCT00340522 -
Childhood Cancer and Plexiform Neurofibroma Tissue Microarray for Molecular Target Screening and Clinical Drug Development
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT04843891 -
Evaluation of PET Probe [64]Cu-Macrin in Cardiovascular Disease, Cancer and Sarcoidosis.
|
Phase 1 | |
Active, not recruiting |
NCT03844048 -
An Extension Study of Venetoclax for Subjects Who Have Completed a Prior Venetoclax Clinical Trial
|
Phase 3 | |
Completed |
NCT03167372 -
Pilot Comparison of N-of-1 Trials of Light Therapy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03109041 -
Initial Feasibility Study to Treat Resectable Pancreatic Cancer With a Planar LDR Source
|
Phase 1 | |
Terminated |
NCT01441115 -
ECI301 and Radiation for Advanced or Metastatic Cancer
|
Phase 1 | |
Recruiting |
NCT06206785 -
Resting Energy Expenditure in Palliative Cancer Patients
|