Breast Cancer Screening Clinical Trial
— TOSYMAOfficial title:
Prospective Randomized Comparison of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Plus Synthesized Images Versus Standard Full-field Digital Mammography in Population-based Screening (TOSYMA)
Verified date | March 2022 |
Source | University Hospital Muenster |
Contact | n/a |
Is FDA regulated | No |
Health authority | |
Study type | Interventional |
This study is a randomized, multicenter, multivendor, controlled, diagnostic superiority trial to compare digital breast tomosynthesis plus synthesized 2D mammograms (DBT+s2D) versus standard 2D full-field digital mammography (2D-FFDM) regarding the effectiveness as screening modality.
Status | Active, not recruiting |
Enrollment | 99689 |
Est. completion date | March 31, 2025 |
Est. primary completion date | March 31, 2025 |
Accepts healthy volunteers | Accepts Healthy Volunteers |
Gender | Female |
Age group | 50 Years to 69 Years |
Eligibility | Inclusion Criteria: - Women eligible to participate in the National Mammography Screening Program of Germany - Informed decision for mammography screening - Written informed consent - No prior participation in the TOSYMA trial Exclusion Criteria: - Breast cancer up to 5 years prior to study invitation - Previous mammography examination < 12 months, - Breast implants |
Country | Name | City | State |
---|---|---|---|
Germany | Screening-Einheit Aachen-Düren-Heinsberg; Mammographie-Einheit Aachen | Aachen | Nordrhein-Westfalen |
Germany | Referenz-Screening-Einheit Münster-Nord/Warendorf; Mammographie-Einheit Ahlen | Ahlen | Nordrhein-Westfalen |
Germany | Screening-Einheit Köln rechtsrheinisch, Leverkusen, Rhein.-Berg. Kreis, Oberbergischer Kreis; Mammographie-Einheit Bergisch Gladbach | Bergisch Gladbach | Nordrhein-Westfalen |
Germany | Screening-Einheit Bielefeld, Gütersloh; Mammographie-Einheit Bielefeld | Bielefeld | Nordrhein-Westfalen |
Germany | Screening-Einheit Münster-Süd; Mammographie-Einheit Coesfeld | Coesfeld | Nordrhein-Westfalen |
Germany | Screening-Einheit Duisburg; Mammographie-Einheit Duisburg | Duisburg | Nordrhein-Westfalen |
Germany | Screening-Einheit Gelsenkirchen, Kreis Recklinghausen, Bottrop; Mammographie-Einheit Gelsenkirchen | Gelsenkirchen | Nordrhein-Westfalen |
Germany | Screening-Einheit Hannover; Mammographie-Einheit Hannover | Hannover | Niedersachsen |
Germany | Screening-Einheit Minden-Lübbecke, Herford; Mammographie-Einheit Herford | Herford | Nordrhein-Westfalen |
Germany | Screening-Einheit Mönchengladbach, Krefeld, Viersen; Mammographie-Einheit Krefeld | Krefeld | Nordrhein-Westfalen |
Germany | Screening-Einheit Höxter, Paderborn, Soest; Mammographie-Einheit Lippstadt | Lippstadt | Nordrhein-Westfalen |
Germany | Screening-Einheit Niedersachsen Nordost; Mammographie-Einheit Lüneburg | Lüneburg | Niedersachsen |
Germany | Referenz-Screeening-Einheit Münster-Nord/Warendorf; Mammographie-Einheit Münster-Nord | Münster | Nordrhein-Westfalen |
Germany | Screening-Einheit Münster-Süd; Mammographie-Einheit Münster | Münster | Nordrhein-Westfalen |
Germany | Screening-Einheit Höxter, Paderborn, Soest; Mammographie-Einheit Paderborn | Paderborn | Nordrhein-Westfalen |
Germany | Screening-Einheit Märkischer Kreis, Hamm, Unna; Mammographie-Einheit Schwerte | Schwerte | Nordrhein-Westfalen |
Germany | Screening-Einheit Raum Bergisch Land/Kreis Mettmann; Mammographie-Einheit Solingen-Mitte | Solingen | Nordrhein-Westfalen |
Germany | Screening-Einheit Niedersachsen Nord; Mammographie-Einheit Stade | Stade | Niedersachsen |
Germany | Screening-Einheit Niedersachsen Mitte; Mammographie-Einheit Vechta | Vechta | Niedersachsen |
Germany | Screening-Einheit Niedersachsen Nordwest; Mammographie-Einheit Wilhelmshaven | Wilhelmshaven | Niedersachsen |
Germany | Screening-Einheit Raum Bergisch Land/Kreis Mettmann; Mammographie-Einheit Wuppertal-Elberfeld | Wuppertal | Nordrhein-Westfalen |
Lead Sponsor | Collaborator |
---|---|
University Hospital Muenster | German Research Foundation |
Germany,
Weigel S, Gerss J, Hense HW, Krischke M, Sommer A, Czwoydzinski J, Lenzen H, Kerschke L, Spieker K, Dickmaenken S, Baier S, Urban M, Hecht G, Heidinger O, Kieschke J, Heindel W. Digital breast tomosynthesis plus synthesised images versus standard full-field digital mammography in population-based screening (TOSYMA): protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2018 May 14;8(5):e020475. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020475. — View Citation
Type | Measure | Description | Time frame | Safety issue |
---|---|---|---|---|
Primary | Detection rate of invasive breast cancers | Number of women with screening-detected invasive breast cancer divided by the number of all women screened. A screening-detected breast cancer is classified as invasive carcinoma if the pT category (pathological tumor size) of the TNM classification falls into one of the following categories: pT1mic, pT1a, pT1b, pT1c, pT1, pT2, pT3, pT4a, pT4b, pT4c, pT4d, pT4, pTX (for evaluation purpose pTX defines histologically approved invasive breast cancer with missing tumor diameter) or the final pathological categorization has been done after neoadjuvant therapy (ypT), implying an invasive cancer prior to therapy. | Routine screening visit | |
Primary | Cumulative 24 months incidence of interval cancers | The 24 months incidence of interval cancers is defined as the number of women that develop a ductal carcinoma in situ or an invasive breast cancer in the 24 months interval after a negative screening examination divided by the number of all women with a negative screening result. | 24 months after routine screening visit | |
Secondary | Detection rate of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) | Number of women with screening-detected ductal carcinoma in situ (if the pT category of the TNM classification falls into the category pTis) divided by the number of all women screened. | Routine screening visit | |
Secondary | Detection rate of tumor category pT1 | Number of women with screening-detected invasive breast cancers of the category pT1 divided by the number of all women screened. A screening-detected breast cancer is classified as breast cancer of tumor category pT1 if tumor size is = 20 mm in greatest dimension and the respective pT subcategory of the pTNM classification is one of the following: pT1mic, pT1a, pT1b, pT1c, pT1. | Routine screening visit | |
Secondary | Recall rate for further assessment | Number of women with recalls for further assessment divided by the number of all women screened. | Routine Screening Visit | |
Secondary | Positive predictive value of recall for further assessment (PPV1) | Number of women with screening-detected malignancies (ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive breast cancer) divided by the number of women with recalls for further assessment. | Routine screening visit | |
Secondary | Cumulative 12 months incidence of interval cancers | The 12 months incidence of interval cancers is defined as the number of women that develop a ductal carcinoma in situ or an invasive breast cancer in the 12 months interval after a negative screening examination divided by the number of all women with a negative screening result. | 12 months after routine screening visit |
Status | Clinical Trial | Phase | |
---|---|---|---|
Completed |
NCT04601272 -
Evaluating the Shared Decision Making Process Scale in Cancer Screening Decisions
|
||
Completed |
NCT03979729 -
Breast Cancer Screening for Underserved Women: Comparing Outcomes and Lowering Recall Rates With 3D- vs. 2D-mammography
|
||
Completed |
NCT02198690 -
Trial of a Mammography Decision Aid for Women Aged 75 and Older
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01885741 -
Study to Demonstrate the Preliminary Safety and Effectiveness of IPBS in Performing MRI-Guided Targeting and Intervention of Breast Tissue in Female Patients Indicated for MRI-Guided Breast Biopsy
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT01267110 -
Engaging Diverse Underserved Communities to Bridge the Mammography Divide
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00287040 -
Breast Cancer Screening Via Computer V. Phone
|
Phase 3 | |
Recruiting |
NCT05268224 -
A Tear-based, Lab-developed Test for Breast Cancer for Women With Dense Breast Tissue
|
||
Recruiting |
NCT06098118 -
Adapting a Mammography Decision Aid to Support Women Living in a Community Contaminated by PFAS
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT05821023 -
Messaging Strategies to Reduce Breast Cancer Over-screening in Older Women
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05841355 -
Empowering Latinas to Obtain Guideline Concordant Screenings
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT05960188 -
Project 1: Self-Triage by 2D Full-field Digital Mammography or Synthetic Images
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04429269 -
A Comparative Study of Mammography and Ultrasound for Breast Cancer Screening and Early Diagnosis
|
||
Completed |
NCT05756725 -
Improving Cancer Screening and Follow-up in Community Health Centers
|
N/A | |
Enrolling by invitation |
NCT06059300 -
Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for the Dutch National Breast Cancer Screening Program
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03046004 -
Effect of Information About the Benefits and Harms of Mammography on Women's Decision Making
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT03517813 -
CESM ABMR Breast Cancer Screening Trial
|
||
Completed |
NCT02273206 -
Collaborative Care to Reduce Depression and Increase Cancer Screening Among Low-Income Urban Women
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT00224224 -
A Comparison of Primary Care and Traditional Internal Medicine Residents
|
N/A | |
Recruiting |
NCT04102722 -
Safety and Performance of the Multi-Modal UltraSound Tomography (MUST) Device in Breast Cancer Screening
|
N/A | |
Completed |
NCT04259866 -
FALSE POSITIVE FINDINGS IN BREAST CANCER TOMOSYNTHESIS
|