Clinical Trial Details
— Status: Completed
Administrative data
| NCT number |
NCT03266809 |
| Other study ID # |
188676 |
| Secondary ID |
|
| Status |
Completed |
| Phase |
|
| First received |
|
| Last updated |
|
| Start date |
August 1, 2017 |
| Est. completion date |
April 1, 2020 |
Study information
| Verified date |
November 2022 |
| Source |
Swansea University |
| Contact |
n/a |
| Is FDA regulated |
No |
| Health authority |
|
| Study type |
Observational
|
Clinical Trial Summary
This study will investigate the influence of systemic adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy (SAT:
chemotherapy +/- anti-HER2 antibodies (trastuzumab +/- pertuzumab) on heart function/rhythm
and cardio-respiratory fitness in recently diagnosed breast cancer patients. In some
patients, SAT damages the heart (so-called 'cardiotoxicity') and this can have a serious
impact on the patient's quality of life and overall survival. It has also been suggested that
anticancer therapies may lead to repolarization abnormalities, QT prolongation and autonomic
dysfunction, clinically reflected by an increase in HR and a reduction in heart rate
variability (HRV). There is a lack of information in the literature regarding the extent and
time-course of changes in cardiac function, cardiac rhythm and cardio-respiratory performance
('fitness') in these patients. Moreover, the differential influences of specific treatment
regimes (e.g. SAT or SAT plus radiotherapy) and different chemotherapy drugs on
cardio-respiratory performance remain unclear. A better understanding of these issues is the
primary aim of this study.
Description:
This study will focus on the following:
1. Cardiac function assessment: The conventional method for assessing heart function (in
terms of 'ejection fraction') in patients being treated for cancer uses nuclear medicine
(MUGA scan). MRI can also provide this information but it is not typically used for
cardiac function assessment in these patients. MUGA scans are typically performed before
chemotherapy in selected patients at higher risk of cardiotoxicity and in all cases
before starting anti-HER2 antibody treatment (trastuzumab, pertuzumab). Patients
receiving anti-HER2 antibody treatment receive repeat cardiac assessments at 3-4 month
intervals until the completion of treatment - it is not practical or cost-effective to
scan more frequently. This study will determine whether an alternative and inexpensive
method for monitoring heart function (Impedance Cardiography, ICG) can adequately
quantify changes in ejection fraction during treatment. If it can, then this technique
could be used more frequently during and following treatment, with the aim of
determining the treatment stages during which the heart is most at risk of damage. The
ability of ICG to dynamically characterise a relatively rapid decline in cardiac
function in breast cancer patients has not been established. Neither has its performance
been compared with MRI or MUGA in this population. This study will investigate whether
ICG is a sufficiently accurate and reliable alternative to MRI/MUGA for determining
cardiac dysfunction during and following cancer treatment.
2. Cardiac rhythm and autonomic function assessment: Heart rate variability (HRV) reflects
the modulation of the heart by the autonomic nervous system, and it can be quantified
using several different methods based on analysis of the temporal changes between
successive heartbeats. The development of autonomic dysfunction in breast cancer
patients has been shown in a few small clinical studies, but the majority of these
studies have considered HR rather than HRV, which is a much less robust measure of
autonomic function. The few studies that have used HRV analysis have demonstrated
significant reductions in HRV following the completion of anthracycline-based therapy.
Previous research on other ECG markers (e.g. QT and QRS duration) in breast cancer
patients has mainly focused on anthracycline-based regimes; the influence of trastuzumab
treatment on ECG makers has been evaluated in only two studies to date. It is still not
clear whether these changes can predict subsequent LV dysfunction although QT
variability is a possible marker of myocardial contractility and has been shown to
increase as a result of anthracycline therapy in breast cancer patients. This study aims
to characterise the impact of different treatment regimes on the temporal properties of
the ECG and will compare beat-to-beat QT variability and beat-to-beat T wave variability
in breast cancer patients receiving a range of treatment regimes.
3. Body composition and cardiorespiratory fitness assessment: This study also aims to
characterise the patterns of change in body composition, physical activity and
cardiorespiratory fitness in breast cancer patients. The study will examine whether
these modifiable factors might influence a patient's susceptibility to cardiac changes
during treatment and, in turn, how these factors are affected by treatment. Of
particular interest, it has been suggested that cardiorespiratory fitness (measured by
the rate of oxygen uptake) is impaired in breast cancer patients compared to healthy
controls, even seven years following the completion of treatment. Oxygen-uptake analysis
will be performed in this study to explore possible compensatory mechanisms for abnormal
pathology- or treatment-induced cardiac function in breast cancer patients. Fitness,
physical activity and body composition will be assessed quantitatively using a range of
objective techniques, including cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a cycle ergometer
(fitness) with breath-by-breath gas analysis (cardiorespiratory function),
accelerometery (activity levels) and DEXA radiography scans (body composition).
The main research questions in this study are:
1. Is the CARE-B protocol practically feasible and tolerable to early-stage breast cancer
patients?
2. What is the level of agreement between cardiac (ventricular) function determined using
cardiac MRI, MUGA and Impedance Cardiography in breast cancer patients receiving SAT?
3. Is cardiac rhythm (heart rate and QT variability) altered in breast cancer patients
receiving SAT?
4. Is oxygen transport and oxygen uptake into tissue altered in breast cancer patients
receiving SAT?
5. Does a patient's baseline physical activity, fitness and body composition affect their
susceptibilities to treatment-induced cardio-respiratory problems?
6. Does a patient's physical activity, physical fitness and body composition change
appreciably during SAT in these patients?