View clinical trials related to Brain Injuries.
Filter by:Childhood traumatic brain injury (TBI) poses significant impairment in children's executive functions (EFs) for moderate to severe injuries, yet interventions specifically designed for children's EF rehabilitation post-TBI and rigorous clinical trials to establish the efficacy of such interventions remain unavailable. In this study, the investigators will conduct a randomized clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy of a novel virtual reality (VR)-based training program for EF rehabilitation for childhood TBI.
Hemocoagulation disorder is recognized to have crucial effects on hemorrhagic or ischemic diseases. Coagulation-related damages secondary to traumatic brain injury are common and severe secondary insults of head trauma and often leads to a poor prognosis. In this study, we sought to assess if posttraumatic hemocoagulation disorders determined using thromboelastography are associated with coagulation-related damages secondary to traumatic brain injury, and evaluate their influence on outcome among patients with head trauma. Based on above results, prediction models or risk scoring systems will be further developed and validated to predict coagulation-related damages secondary to traumatic brain injury.
Tranexamic acid (TXA) reduces head injury deaths. The CRASH-4 trial aims to assess the effects of early intramuscular TXA on intracranial haemorrhage, disability, death, and dementia in older adults with symptomatic mild head injury
Beta blockers (BB) play an important role in protection of end organs that are susceptible for secondary injury by the Traumatic brain injury (TBI)-induced catecholamine surge. However, use of BBs in trauma patients is not yet the standard of care which necessitates clear scientific evidence and justification to be used especially in TBI patients. The BBTBBT study aims to determine whether early administration of propranolol based on the HSTnT status will improve the outcome of mild-to-severe TBI patients. Our primary hypothesis is that BBs are effective in reducing 10 and 30-day mortality in TBI patients.BBs are effective in reducing 10 and 30-day mortality in TBI patients. Methods/Design: The BBTBBT study is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, three-arm trial of BB use in mild-to-severe TBI patients based on the HsTnT status.
Efficacy of Nucleo CMP Forte in Traumatic Brain Injury in Pediatrics
Severe Acquired Brain Injury is defined as a traumatic, post-anoxic, vascular or other brain damage that causes coma for at least 24 hours and leads to permanent disability with sensorial, motor, cognitive or compartmental impairment. In this context, an accurate characterization of individual patients' profile in terms of neuronal damage, potential for neuroplasticity, neurofunctional and clinical state could allow to plan tailored rehabilitation and care pathway on the basis of solid prognostic information, also for optimizing resources of the National Health care systems and enhance ethical decisions. Patient profiling should encompass measures and procedures easily available at the bedside, and with affordable time, resource, and money-costs to determine a real impact on National Health systems. The aim of the study is identifying patient profiles in terms of clinical, neurophysiological and genetical aspects with better long-term outcome in order to plan tailored therapeutic interventions.
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury (s-TBI) is a major cause of death and disability across all ages. Besides the primary impact, the pathophysiologic process of major secondary brain damage consists of a neuroinflammation response that critically leads to irreversible brain damage in the first days after the trauma. A key catalyst in this inflammatory process is the complement system. Inhibiting the complement system is therefore considered to be a potentially important new treatment for TBI, as has been shown in animal studies. This trial aims to study the safety and efficacy of C1-inhibitor compared to placebo in TBI patients. By temporarily blocking the complement system we hypothesize limitation of secondary brain injury and more favourable clinical outcome for TBI patients due to a decrease in the posttraumatic neuroinflammatory response.
Patients with a diagnosis of moderate to severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) will be enrolled. Subjects will be randomly assigned to receive either MLC901 (Specified Drug Code) or placebo capsules three times per day over 6 months. Evaluation of patients will be carried out at baseline as well as at 3-month and 6-month follow-up visits. Modified Rankin Scale (mRS) and Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) will be used to examine patients. Efficacy will be evaluated by comparing these two scores between the 2 groups at follow-up visits.
The purpose of this research is to test a service the investigators of the study believe may increase quality of life after brain injury and reduce the level of disability that might be associated with that injury. This intervention is called "Resource Facilitation" and involves working one on one with a brain injury specialist. This specialist is called a "Resource Facilitator" and will work with participants to help set and achieve their own goals along with a team of professionals that specialize in this kind of injury. If randomly assigned to the Resource Facilitation group, participants will receive Resource Facilitation free of charge. If not, they will be assigned to a control group and will not receive the intervention. However, both groups will receive calls every three months. During these calls, a research assistant will collect data about each participant's recovery and progress. If assigned to the Resource Facilitation group, participants may also receive study information in the mail if research assistants are unable to reach participants via telephone.
Rationale Several experimental and clinical studies have shown how brain injury can cause secondary lung injury. Lung injury could be due either to mechanical ventilation- often necessary in brain injured patients- or to inflammatory response that follows primary acute brain injury. The concept of 'Protective lung ventilation' has shown to reduce morbidity and mortality of intensive care unit (ICU) patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) but seems also to have a beneficial effect on patients with healthy lungs and in the perioperative settings. However, these recommendations often come into conflict with the management of patients affected by acute brain injury, in which permissive hypercapnia and increased intrathoracic pressure as consequence of protective ventilation strategies can be dangerous. Study design This is an international multi-center prospective observational study. Study population This study will include all consecutive brain injured patients (traumatic brain injury (TBI) or cerebrovascular) intubated and ventilated in ICU and observed for a 7-day period. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness Seen the observational design of the study, there is no patient burden. Collection of data from ICU and hospital charts and/or (electronic) medical records systems is of no risk to patients.