TECR & ECM Placement for Esophageal High Grade Dysplasia

Barrett Esophagus Clinical Trial

Official title:

A Prospective Feasibility Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Transoral Endoscopic Circumferential Esophageal Resection With Extracellular Matrix (ECM) Placement to Treat Barrett's Esophagus With High-grade Dysplasia (HGD)

Clinical Trial Details — Status: Terminated

Administrative data

• NCT number: NCT02396745
• Other study ID #: 12-024
• Status: Terminated
• Phase: N/A
• Start date: January 25, 2016
• Est. completion date: March 22, 2018

Study information

• Verified date: February 2019
• Source: Allegheny Singer Research Institute
• Contact: n/a
• Is FDA regulated: No
• Study type: Interventional

Clinical Trial Summary

This study will test the safety and effectiveness of esophageal transoral endoscopic circumferential resection (TECR) using an extracellular matrix (ECM) placement to treat Barrett's esophagus in patients with high-grade dysplasia (HGD). Endoscopic circumferential resection using ECM placement has been introduced as a less invasive, externally incision-less approach to treat patients with esophageal high grade dysplasia; a pre-cancerous condition. In this procedure, the entire length of diseased (abnormal) mucosa (esophagus lining) will be removed using an endoscope that will be inserted through the mouth. The ECM will be placed over the area that is being removed with a temporary, expandable stent to prevent narrowing of the esophagus. The stent is being used to hold the ECM in place as the body begins the healing process. This stent will be removed 14 days (±4 days) after this procedure. Follow-up esophagogastroduodenoscopies (EGD), barium swallow x-ray tests, and questionnaires will take place for 12 months following the procedure. The result of this study may help doctors determine if this procedure would be a more effective treatment option for HGD in the future.

Description:

This is a single-center, prospective, single arm study involving 10 patients with an established diagnosis of Barrett's Esophagus (BE) with High Grade Dysplasia (HGD). Potential subjects will be prescreened to assess eligibility and must meet inclusion criteria. In order to make this initial qualification, pathology results of biopsies and EMR collected during initial EGD will be made available to the Investigator prior to patient consent. Following informed consent and as part of routine care, all potential participants will undergo endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) and a PET/CT scan to confirm that there is no lymph node involvement or other metastatic lesions prior to the procedure. Clinical data will be collected at baseline to assess the subjects' medical status including: demographics, medical history, physical examination, vital signs, and blood testing. Cardiac and pulmonary clearance will be obtained if needed based on medical history and will include a chest x-ray, ECG, and pulmonary function test. In addition, the subjects will complete three questionnaires prior to the procedure: dysphagia severity questionnaire, SF-36, and GERD-HRQL.

At the time of the procedure, participants will undergo TECR with ECM placement using a fully covered self-expanding metal stent to temporarily hold the ECM in place. Prior to hospital discharge, a barium swallow test (BaSW) will be performed at Day 1 following the study procedure to evaluate the passage of contrast through the GEJ. If the BaSW results in suspicious findings of esophageal perforation or mucosal necrosis, an upper endoscopy will be performed for further evaluation. The first primary safety endpoint for this study will be assessed following the procedure and BaSW and before discharge from the hospital. At this time point any adverse events will be assessed and recorded.

All subjects will undergo the same follow-up procedures, including questionnaires and post-procedure EGDs performed at Week 2, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9 and Month 12 to visually assess tissue healing, recurrent disease, and if stricture formation is present. Biopsies will be taken during follow-up EGDs so that pathology can rule out recurrence of BE and HGD. Subjects will have a barium swallow x-ray at Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, and Month 12 to evaluate the potential presence of stricture formation.

During Week 2 EGD, the stent will be removed during the upper endoscopy. If at any time point a subject has dysphagia with stricture formation (30% reduction in esophageal luminal diameter), routine dilation using a balloon catheter will be performed during the EGD. Validated questionnaires including dysphagia severity questionnaire, SF-36 and GERD-HRQL will be administered to objectively assess the severity of symptoms and quality of life based upon self-reported data. Additionally, adverse events will be assessed and recorded at all follow-up time points.

After completion of the Month 12 visit, subjects will be followed on a routine care basis at the Esophageal & Lung Institute.

Recruitment information / eligibility

• Status: Terminated
• Enrollment: 1
• Est. completion date: March 22, 2018
• Est. primary completion date: March 22, 2018
• Accepts healthy volunteers: No
• Gender: All
• Age group: 18 Years to 80 Years

Eligibility

Inclusion Criteria:

1. Be at least 18 years of age and no more than 80 years of age.

2. Have an established diagnosis of HGD

a. Specific diagnosis and grading will be determined by pathology review of biopsy tissue collected during baseline EGD as part of a patient's standard of care.

3. Have no evidence of lymphovascular invasion.

4. Have no lymph node or other metastatic involvement based on EUS and FDG-PET/CT.

5. Diameter of affected tissue must warrant circumferential excision a. Subjects must have biopsy confirmed HGD in three of four esophageal quadrants at two levels spaced two centimeters apart (minimum of 6/8 biopsies indicating HGD). If two biopsies are normal (contain no HGD) they must be located on separate levels in two different quadrants.

5. Must be an appropriate or reasonable surgical candidate. 6. Have demonstrated an understanding and signed an approved informed consent form for participation in this study.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Have lesions into or deeper than mucosal layer (superficial (T1a) Esophageal adenocarcinoma).

a. Those requiring endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) are not eligible for this study

2. Have presence of lymphovascular invasion.

3. Require resection length longer than 10 cm.

4. Have any lymph node or other metastatic involvement based on EUS and FDG-PET/CT.

5. Have history of any kind of previous esophageal surgery (i.e. anti-reflux surgery).

6. Are pregnant or planning to become pregnant.

7. Have coagulation disorders.

8. Have a known hypersensitivity to porcine-based materials.

9. Have an uncontrolled comorbid medical condition that would adversely affect participation in the trial.

10. Has a clinically significant psychological illness that in the physician's opinion would prohibit the subject's ability to meet the protocol requirements.

11. Are unable or unwilling to provide informed consent and/or fulfill the protocol follow-up requirements.

Related Conditions & MeSH terms

• Barrett Esophagus
• Esophagus
• High Grade Dysplasia

Intervention

Device:
• Subjects undergoing TECR with ECM placement (ACell MatriStem, Boston Scientific WallFlex))
TECR will be performed to resect the entire length and area of BE lesion. ECM PLACEMENT: Following resection, the exposed area will be covered with a 6 ply sheet of ACell MatriStem® Surgical Matrix PSMX ECM (ACell Inc., Columbia, MA). The ECM will be placed and held in position for 14 days (±4 days) using a Boston Scientific WallFlex™ Fully Covered Esophageal Stent (Boston Scientific, Boston, MA).

Locations

Country	Name	City	State
United States	West Penn Allegheny Health System	Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania

Sponsors (2)

Lead Sponsor	Collaborator
Allegheny Singer Research Institute	ACell Inc.

Country where clinical trial is conducted

United States, 

References & Publications (16)

Badylak SF, Hoppo T, Nieponice A, Gilbert TW, Davison JM, Jobe BA. Esophageal preservation in five male patients after endoscopic inner-layer circumferential resection in the setting of superficial cancer: a regenerative medicine approach with a biologic scaffold. Tissue Eng Part A. 2011 Jun;17(11-12):1643-50. doi: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2010.0739. Epub 2011 Mar 28. — View Citation

Badylak SF, Vorp DA, Spievack AR, Simmons-Byrd A, Hanke J, Freytes DO, Thapa A, Gilbert TW, Nieponice A. Esophageal reconstruction with ECM and muscle tissue in a dog model. J Surg Res. 2005 Sep;128(1):87-97. — View Citation

Bakken JC, Wong Kee Song LM, de Groen PC, Baron TH. Use of a fully covered self-expandable metal stent for the treatment of benign esophageal diseases. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Oct;72(4):712-20. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.06.028. — View Citation

Baron TH, Burgart LJ, Pochron NL. An internally covered (lined) self-expanding metal esophageal stent: tissue response in a porcine model. Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Aug;64(2):263-7. — View Citation

Buscaglia JM, Ho S, Sethi A, Dimaio CJ, Nagula S, Stavropoulos SN, Gonda TA, Poneros JM, Stevens PD. Fully covered self-expandable metal stents for benign esophageal disease: a multicenter retrospective case series of 31 patients. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jul;74(1):207-11. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.02.024. Epub 2011 May 6. — View Citation

Eloubeidi MA, Lopes TL. Novel removable internally fully covered self-expanding metal esophageal stent: feasibility, technique of removal, and tissue response in humans. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jun;104(6):1374-81. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.133. Epub 2009 Apr 28. — View Citation

Hirdes MM, Siersema PD, Houben MH, Weusten BL, Vleggaar FP. Stent-in-stent technique for removal of embedded esophageal self-expanding metal stents. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011 Feb;106(2):286-93. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.394. Epub 2010 Oct 12. — View Citation

Hoppo T, Badylak SF, Jobe BA. A novel esophageal-preserving approach to treat high-grade dysplasia and superficial adenocarcinoma in the presence of chronic gastroesophageal reflux disease. World J Surg. 2012 Oct;36(10):2390-3. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1698-6. — View Citation

Liu J, Hu Y, Cui C, Li Y, Lin X, Fu J. Removable, fully covered, self-expandable metal stents for the treatment of refractory benign esophagogastric anastomotic strictures. Dysphagia. 2012 Jun;27(2):260-4. doi: 10.1007/s00455-011-9361-1. Epub 2011 Aug 9. — View Citation

Nieponice A, Gilbert TW, Badylak SF. Reinforcement of esophageal anastomoses with an extracellular matrix scaffold in a canine model. Ann Thorac Surg. 2006 Dec;82(6):2050-8. — View Citation

Nieponice A, McGrath K, Qureshi I, Beckman EJ, Luketich JD, Gilbert TW, Badylak SF. An extracellular matrix scaffold for esophageal stricture prevention after circumferential EMR. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Feb;69(2):289-96. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.04.022. Epub 2008 Jul 26. — View Citation

Rice TW, Zuccaro G Jr, Adelstein DJ, Rybicki LA, Blackstone EH, Goldblum JR. Esophageal carcinoma: depth of tumor invasion is predictive of regional lymph node status. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Mar;65(3):787-92. — View Citation

Sharma P, Kozarek R; Practice Parameters Committee of American College of Gastroenterology. Role of esophageal stents in benign and malignant diseases. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb;105(2):258-73; quiz 274. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.684. Epub 2009 Dec 22. — View Citation

van Heijl M, Gooszen JA, Fockens P, Busch OR, van Lanschot JJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI. Risk factors for development of benign cervical strictures after esophagectomy. Ann Surg. 2010 Jun;251(6):1064-9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181deb4b7. — View Citation

Witteman BP, Foxwell TJ, Monsheimer S, Gelrud A, Eid GM, Nieponice A, O'Rourke RW, Hoppo T, Bouvy ND, Badylak SF, Jobe BA. Transoral endoscopic inner layer esophagectomy: management of high-grade dysplasia and superficial cancer with organ preservation. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009 Dec;13(12):2104-12. doi: 10.1007/s11605-009-1053-x. Epub 2009 Oct 14. — View Citation

Yoon CJ, Shin JH, Song HY, Lim JO, Yoon HK, Sung KB. Removal of retrievable esophageal and gastrointestinal stents: experience in 113 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004 Nov;183(5):1437-44. — View Citation

* Note: There are 16 references in all — Click here to view all references

Outcome

Type	Measure	Description	Time frame	Safety issue
Primary	Efficacy: Stricture Formation	To evaluate incidence of stricture formation requiring dilation (=30% luminal diameter reduction with dysphagia) following TECR with ECM placement. Evidence of stricture formation will be confirmed endoscopically at 2 weeks, and endoscopically and through barium swallow at Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, and Month 12 post procedure, and the proportion of subjects with and without stricture formation at the trial endpoints will be compared to historical data.	12 months following procedure
Primary	Efficacy: Recurrent Disease	To evaluate incidence of recurrence of BE with HGD through 12 months following TECR with ECM placement. Incidence of disease recurrence will be confirmed endoscopically with pathology confirmed biopsies at 2 weeks, Month 1, Month 3, Month 6, Month 9, and Month 12 post procedure, and the proportion of subjects with and without disease recurrence at the trial endpoints will be compared to historical data.	12 months following procedure
Primary	Safety: Acute (Serious System and Procedure Related Adverse Events)	To demonstrate the acute safety of TECR with ECM placement for treatment of BE with HGD by evaluating all serious system and procedure related adverse events occurring in the first 2 weeks post procedure.	Two weeks following procedure
Primary	Safety: Long-term (Study Related Adverse Events)	To demonstrate the long-term safety of TECR with ECM placement for treatment of BE with HGD by evaluating all study related adverse events occurring more than 2 weeks post procedure through 12 months post procedure.	Two weeks through 12 months post procedure
Secondary	Stent Migration	To record the incidence of stent migration at 2 weeks post procedure. Stent migration will be determined endoscopically, and defined as any movement from initial deployment location greater than 1cm.	2 weeks
Secondary	Stent Integrity (e.g. Stent Fracture)	To record incidences of poor stent integrity during removal (e.g. stent fracture).	2 weeks
Secondary	Additional Interventions (Number of Subsequent Follow up Treatment Interventions)	To record the number of subsequent follow up treatment interventions (aside from study-related follow up time points) required post-procedure through 12 months.	12 months