View clinical trials related to Back Pain.
Filter by:This study is a prospective, single-arm, open label, single center to confirm the effectiveness and safety of an ultra-high frequency (500 KHz) spinal cord stimulation in patients with chronic back pain or lower limb pain.
trigger point dry needling with intramuscular electrical stimulation vs trigger point dry needling
The specific aim of this study is to conduct a prospective, multicenter cohort study over four months to compare the cost of standard of allopathic care (control group, N=90) versus standard of care plus osteopathic manipulative treatment (experimental group, N=90) in a cohort of 180 consecutive patients seeking treatment for chronic low back pain at three osteopathic clinics and three allopathic medical clinics (offering only standard care) located in three different regions of the United States.
The purposes of this study are to compare the effects of core stabilization exercises on pain intensity, functional disability and lumbar stability between using and not using the Swiss ball in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of pulse widths <500 µS and >1000 µS on clinical outcomes during a temporary SCS trial.
Chronic low back pain has been identified as a major problem for seafood and agricultural workers, and is known to affect worker health and productivity. The aims of this study are to: 1) identify modifiable, sector-specific, work and movement solutions with the potential to reduce the burden or severity of chronic lower back pain in clam workers and 2) determine the extent that participants adopt identified solution(s), and the impact on functional difficulty and low back pain.
This study will investigate implementation of a process to enhance Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) adherence to limit unwarranted variability in initial treatment decisions with high potential for providing more effective and efficient physical therapy management for patients with neck and low back pain.
The purpose of this study will be to determine the efficacy and the prognostic value of a continuous intrathecal prognostic infusion test in an in-hospital setting for selecting patients who would have better long term outcomes for treatment with intrathecal implantable devices. The investigators will compare the primary outcomes [changes in pain intensity score (NRS), patient global impression of change (PGIC)] before and after intrathecal infusion of an admixture of bupivacaine 0.625 mg/ml and fentanyl 1 mcg/ml versus normal saline. The study will include 36 patients with intractable chronic low back pain in the setting of lumbar post-laminectomy syndrome or vertebral compression fracture who failed conservative management and are considered candidates for IDDS. Prior to the implant, the patients will undergo an intrathecal prognostic infusion test with an externalized catheter. Baseline NRS pain scores will be assessed and documented on all patients upon admission to the preoperative area. An intrathecal catheter will be placed in the outpatient procedure suite at the appropriate level for target dermatomes. The needle entry point will occur in the upper lumbar spine and catheter tip will be placed in the lower thoracic spine, under local anesthesia with the patient awake and with minimal or no sedation. The intrathecal infusion will be started using an external pump once patient is in the PACU. The research component is to perform the intrathecal test with normal saline (inactive placebo solution) in addition to a test with fentanyl and bupivacaine (active solution). Patients will be randomly assigned to either Group I (continuous infusion of bupivacaine and fentanyl followed by saline) or Group II (continuous infusion of saline followed by bupivacaine and fentanyl). In PACU, patients will be started on an infusion rate of 0.5 ml/hr and titrated to pain relief greater than 50% of baseline or up to 0.8-1.0 ml/hr within 6-8 hrs after start of the infusion. A clinician blinded to the treatment arm will assess NRS and PGIC on the patients after approximately 12 hours. Assessment will include changes in pain intensity score at rest and upon ambulating or performing maneuvers that normally elicit patient's low back pain. A 4-6-hour washout period will be allotted with infusion of preservative-free normal saline at a rate of 0.2 ml/hr, after which the physician will document a return of the NRS to baseline before switching therapies.
Back pain is the #1 contributor to disability in the United States (US), and second only to hearing problems as a reason for new Veteran disability compensation. The societal burden of back pain is driven mainly by chronic low back pain (CLBP), defined as low back pain persisting for 3 months. Since most individual treatments for CLBP have only small effects on functional recovery, combining CLBP treatments has recently been recommended as a priority area for research. However, few prior studies of CLBP have been properly designed to evaluate the effects of treatment combinations. Large effects on functional recovery from CLBP may require combining interventions that each target different points on a theoretical pathway to functional recovery. Procedural treatments for CLBP aim primarily to address early stages in the pathway to functional recovery, such as problems with the lumbar spinal structures or low back pain itself. In contrast, behavioral interventions for CLBP generally have effects not only on pain itself, but also work by mitigating the degree to which the sensation of low back pain impacts function, well-being, and quality of life. These represent later stages in the pathway to functional recovery from CLBP. Combining procedural and behavioral treatments may have great potential for achieving large magnitude treatment effects for CLBP in Veterans. The proposed research assesses the feasibility of using a 2 x 2 factorial randomized controlled trial (RCT) design to examine the individual and combined effects of 1) lumbar medial branch nerve radiofrequency ablation (LRFA), a commonly used procedural intervention to target low back pain severity, and 2) a novel video telehealth tablet- and personal computer (PC)-based Activity Tracker-Informed Video-Enabled Cognitive Behavioral Therapy program ("AcTIVE-CBT"), a behavioral intervention designed primarily to target functional limitations both secondary to, and independent of, improvements in pain. The LRFA treatment to be used in the proposed study addresses the major patient selection, procedural/technical, methodologic and reporting limitations of prior studies. AcTIVE-CBT addresses problems with Veteran access and compliance associated with conventional cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) delivered in clinic, and uses currently available activity tracking technology to better promote activity and behavior change as compared to conventional CBT. This pilot RCT involves recruitment of up to 30 Veterans with CLBP who will be followed to evaluate functional recovery for up to 3 months, to reach a goal of 20 Veterans completing the 3-month primary outcome. The primary outcome is participant-reported back-related functional limitations (mobility and ADLs) at 3 months, as measured by the validated Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Secondary outcomes include activity tracker-assessed step counts, back pain intensity, reduction in opioid use, and quality of life. Although the proposed pilot study is unlikely to definitively address whether these treatments alone or in combination have significant effects on functional recovery, it will inform a future large-scale multicenter RCT to determine the efficacy of LRFA, AcTIVE-CBT, or combined LRFA + AcTIVE-CBT, for Veterans with CLBP.
This study investigates the association between the duration of smart phone use and back pain and proprioception deficits in patients with chronic mechanical low back pain (CLBP). It is hypothesized that increased duration of smart phone use will be associated with 1. Increased back pain as measured by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 2. Reduced proprioception acuity as indicated by increased angle of error of back repositioning as measured by isokinetic dynamometer.